The purpose of this study was to describe for asthmatic subjects the distribution of individual bronchial sensitivity to sulfur dioxide (SO2). Subjects were nonsmoking male asthmatics (n = 27) who were sensitive to inhaled methacholine. None of the subjects used corticosteroids or cromolyn sodium. Oral medications were withheld for 48 hr, inhaled medications for 12 hr prior to all testing. Each subject participated in four separate randomly ordered 10 min exposures to 0.00, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.00 ppm SO2 at 26 degrees C, 70% relative humidity. During exposures, subjects breathed naturally and performed moderate exercise (VE, normalized for body surface area = 21 1/m2 X min). Before and 3 min after exposure, specific airway resistance (SRaw) was measured by body plethysmography. Those subjects whose SRaw was not doubled by exposure to 1.00 ppm were also exposed to 2.00 ppm SO2. Dose response curves (relative change in SRaw, corrected for change in clean air vs SO2 concentration) were constructed for each subject. Bronchial sensitivity to SO2 [PC(SO2)], defined as the concentration of SO2 which provoked an increase in SRaw 100% greater than the response to clean air, was determined. Substantial variability in sensitivity was observed: for 23 subjects, PC(SO2) ranged between 0.28 and 1.90 ppm, while for the remaining 4 subjects, it was greater than 2.00 ppm SO2. The median PC(SO2) was 0.75 ppm SO2, and 6 subjects had a PC(SO2) of less than 0.50 ppm. PC(SO2) was not related (r = 0.31) to airway sensitivity to methacholine.

Two experiments were conducted to determine respiratory responses of persons with asthma performing intermittent moderate exercise while exposed to low concentrations of NO2. In the first, preliminary experiment, 13 male subjects, aged 19-35, with mild asthma were exposed on separate days in a chamber (natural breathing, 20 degrees C, 40% RH) to 0.30 ppm NO2 and to a control or "clean air" exposure (0.0 ppm NO2). Exposure included three 10-min periods of moderate treadmill exercise (VE = 44.5 liter/min), each followed by symptom measurement and pulmonary function testing. The average decrease in FEV1 following the initial 10 min exercise in 0.30 ppm was 11% which was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than that observed in clean air (7%). Differences in FVC and SRaw were not significantly different at this time. Slight cough and dry mouth and throat were apparent only after the first exercise in NO2. After the second and third exercises, decreases in FEV1 and FVC and increases in SRaw were significantly greater in 0.30 than in 0.0 ppm NO2. Individual subject responses were variable. These results suggested that some asthmatics who perform moderate exercise while exposed to 0.30 ppm NO2 may experience bronchoconstriction and reduction in spirometric performance. Because of these preliminary findings, a more comprehensive, concentration-response experiment was conducted. Twenty-one male volunteers with mild asthma were exposed for 75 min with natural breathing to 0.0, 0.15, 0.30, and 0.60 ppm NO2. Exposure included three 10-min periods of moderate treadmill exercise (VE = 43 liter/min), each exercise followed by symptoms measurement and pulmonary function testing. In addition, airway responsiveness was measured two hr after each exposure by methacholine bronchial challenge testing. In the control exposures (0.0 ppm NO2), the exercise alone caused substantial decrements in pulmonary function. These decrements (as measured by decreases in FEV1 and FVC, and increases in SRaw) were not increased relative to the control exposure after any exercise session in any concentration of NO2. Furthermore, there was no overall group-averaged indication of a concentration-related effect of the NO2 on pulmonary function. Likewise, symptoms reported after NO2 exposure were not significantly different from those reported in clean air. Group-averaged airway responsiveness after exercise in NO2 was also not different from responsiveness after exercise in clean air. For only two subjects was there any indication of a concentration-related increase in airway responsiveness due to exposure to NO2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Young male volunteers with mild asthma and hypersensitivity to methacholine were exposed for 75 min with natural breathing to 0.0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ppm SO2. Each exposure included three 10-min periods of moderate treadmill exercise (minute ventilation 21 l . m-2 . min-1, O2 consumption 25 ml . kg-1, and heart rate 120/min). Specific airway resistance (sRaw) was not significantly increased after exercise in 0.25 ppm SO2, relative to the control exposure (clean air). In 0.5 and 1.0 ppm SO2, sRaw was increased twofold and threefold above preexposure levels, respectively, corresponding to increases of 3.2 and 9.2 cmH2O . s in excess over the increases seen in clean air (P less than 0.001). There was a broad range of responses to exercise and SO2. The increases in sRaw after the second and third exercises were significantly less than after the first exercise. Respiratory impedance measured by forced random noise suggests that the induced bronchoconstriction was primarily associated with peripheral airways. These results confirm that mild asthmatics selected for methacholine sensitivity have as a group significant bronchoconstriction in response to short-term moderate exercise with natural breathing in 1.0 and 0.5 ppm SO2. In addition, the induced bronchoconstriction is decreased after short-term repeated exercise in SO2.

No abstract