Background— Clinical and experimental data have suggested a potential negative impact of low-T3 state on the prognosis of cardiac diseases. The aim of the present prospective study was to assess the role of thyroid hormones in the prognosis of patient population with heart disease. Methods and Results— A total of 573 consecutive cardiac patients underwent thyroid function profile evaluation. They were divided in two subgroups: group I, 173 patients with low T3, ie, with free T3 (fT3) <3.1 pmol/L, and group II, 400 patients with normal fT3 (≥3.1 pmol/L). We considered cumulative and cardiac death events. During the 1-year follow-up, there were 25 cumulative deaths in group I and 12 in group II (14.4% versus 3%, P <0.0001); cardiac deaths were 13 in group I and 6 in group II (7.5% versus 1.5%, P =0.0006). According to the Cox model, fT3 was the most important predictor of cumulative death (hazard ratio [HR] 3.582, P <0.0001), followed by dyslipidemia (HR 2.955, P =0.023), age (HR 1.051, P <0.005), and left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 1.037, P =0.006). At the logistic multivariate analysis, fT3 was the highest independent predictor of death (HR 0.395, P =0.003). A prevalence of low fT3 levels was found in patients with NYHA class III-IV illness compared with patients with NYHA class I-II (χ 2 5.65, P =0.019). Conclusions— Low-T3 syndrome is a strong predictor of death in cardiac patients and might be directly implicated in the poor prognosis of cardiac patients.

Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels increase in patients with heart failure with the progression of clinical symptoms and with the deterioration of hemodynamics; consequently, assay methods for these peptides may be useful in the follow-up of cardiac patients. Non-competitive immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) methods for ANP or BNP do not generally require preliminary extraction and/or purification of the plasma sample, and so may be more suitable than competitive immunoradiometric assay (RIA) methods for the routine assay of plasma peptide concentrations. We evaluated the analytical characteristics and clinical usefulness of two IRMAs for plasma ANP and BNP, to verify whether these methods may be considered suitable for the follow-up of patients with heart failure. Both methods are based on the solid-phase sandwich IRMA system, which uses two monoclonal antibodies prepared against two sterically remote epitopes of peptide molecule; the first antibody was coated on the beads solid-phase and the second was radiolabeled with 125I. Blood samples were collected from a brachial vein in ice-chilled disposable polypropylene tubes containing aprotinin and EDTA after the patient had rested for at least 20 min in the recumbent position. Plasma samples were immediately separated by centrifugation and stored at -20 C until assay. The IRMA methods showed a better sensitivity and a wider working range sensitivity (about 2 ng/l) than those of RIA methods. Moreover, the normal range found with these methods (ANP = 16.1 +/- 8.6 ng/l, 5.2 +/- 2.8 pmol/l, BNP = 8.6 +/- 8.2 ng/l, 2.5 +/- 2.4 pmol/l) was similar to that generally reported using the most accurate methods, such as the other IRMAs or RIAs, using a preliminary extraction and purification of plasma samples with chromatographic procedures. Our results obtained in patients with different degrees of heart failure indicate that plasma ANP and BNP increase with the progression of clinical symptoms (NYHA class) (ANOVA p < 0.0001). Indeed, circulating levels of ANP (R = -0.701, no. = 86) and BNP (R = -0.745, no. = 55) were significantly (p < 0.0001) and negatively correlated with the left ventricular ejection fraction values. Furthermore, a close curvilinear regression (R = 0.960, no. = 215) was found between ANP and BNP values, because plasma BNP progressively increases more than plasma ANP in patients with different stages of heart failure. In conclusion, IRMA methods are preferable for the measurement of plasma ANP and BNP for experimental studies and routine assay because they are more practicable, sensitive and accurate than RIA procedures. Finally, BNP assay appears to be better than ANP for discriminating between normal subjects and patients with different degrees of heart failure.

The clinical relevance of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) activity, in areas other than hepatic function, has recently been increased by several epidemiological associations. Still, GGT remains a nonspecific test because of the influence of various pathophysiological factors. We devised a procedure based on gel filtration chromatography, followed by postcolumn injection of fluorescent GGT substrate (gamma-glutamyl-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin), permitting the quantification of GGT fractions in serum or plasma. Plasma GGT molecular weight distribution was analyzed in healthy volunteers (20 males; mean+/-SD age 38+/-10 years; 20 females; age 44+/-13; total GGT 21+/-11 for males vs 13+/-7 for females; P<0.01). The method is highly sensitive (determination limit: 0.5 U GGT/L), with a linear dynamic range between 0.5 and 150 U/L for each fraction. Four GGT fractions of different molecular weight were detected in all subjects of both genders: b-GGT, m-GGT, s-GGT (likely lipoprotein-bound, molecular masses >2000, 940, and 140kDa, respectively), and a free fraction (f-GGT, 70kDa). f-GGT and s-GGT were the main fractions in subjects with lower and higher total GGT activity, respectively. Higher total GGT activity in males is related mainly to f-GGT (P<0.01). GGT fraction analysis may increase the sensitivity and specificity of the GGT activity test.

In patients with arterial hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, perindopril + indapamide reduced blood pressure and left ventricular mass index and improved resting and hyperaemic myocardial blood flow. Data in rats provide evidence that the improvement in coronary flow observed after treatment is due to reverse remodelling of intramural coronary arterioles and improved microvascular function.