for the South China Breast Cancer Group (SCBCG) IMPORTANCE Among all subtypes of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer has a relatively high relapse rate and poor outcome after standard treatment. Effective strategies to reduce the risk of relapse and death are needed.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of low-dose capecitabine maintenance after standard adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial conducted at 13 academic centers and clinical sites in China from April 2010 to December 2016 and final date of follow-up was April 30, 2020. Patients (n = 443) had early-stage triple-negative breast cancer and had completed standard adjuvant chemotherapy.INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive capecitabine (n = 222) at a dose of 650 mg/m 2 twice a day by mouth for 1 year without interruption or to observation (n = 221) after completion of standard adjuvant chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included distant disease-free survival, overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and adverse events. RESULTS Among 443 women who were randomized, 434 were included in the full analysis set (mean [SD] age, 46 [9.9] years; T1/T2 stage, 93.1%; node-negative, 61.8%) (98.0% completed the trial). After a median follow-up of 61 months (interquartile range, 44-82), 94 events were observed, including 38 events (37 recurrences and 32 deaths) in the capecitabine group and 56 events (56 recurrences and 40 deaths) in the observation group. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 82.8% in the capecitabine group and 73.0% in the observation group (hazard ratio [HR] for risk of recurrence or death, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.95]; P = .03). In the capecitabine group vs the observation group, the estimated 5-year distant disease-free survival was 85.8% vs 75.8% (HR for risk of distant metastasis or death, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.38-0.92]; P = .02), the estimated 5-year overall survival was 85.5% vs 81.3% (HR for risk of death, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.47-1.19]; P = .22), and the estimated 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival was 85.0% vs 80.8% (HR for risk of locoregional recurrence or death, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.46-1.13]; P = .15). The most common capecitabinerelated adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (45.2%), with 7.7% of patients experiencing a grade 3 event.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among women with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who received standard adjuvant treatment, low-dose capecitabine maintenance therapy for 1 year, compared with observation, resulted in significantly improved 5-year disease-free survival.
Summary We present a web server, GenCLiP 3, which is an updated version of GenCLiP 2.0 to enhance analysis of human gene functions and regulatory networks, with the following improvements: i) accurate recognition of molecular interactions with polarity and directionality from the entire PubMed database; ii) support for Boolean search to customize multiple-term search and to quickly retrieve function related genes; iii) strengthened association between gene and keyword by a new scoring method; and iv) daily updates following literature release at PubMed FTP. Availability The server is freely available for academic use at: http://ci.smu.edu.cn/genclip3/. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Purpose: There is no research evidence demonstrate which is the better partner strategy, endocrine therapy or chemotherapy, to combine with anti-HER2 therapy as the first-line management of hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+) and HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We wished to ascertain if trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy is noninferior to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: We conducted an open-label, noninferiority, phase III, randomized, controlled trial (NCT01950182) at nine hospitals in China. Participants, stratified by previous adjuvant endocrine therapy and disease status (recurrent disease vs. de novo metastasis), were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy (per investigator's choice of oestrogen-receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitor, with/without concurrent ovarian suppression) or chemotherapy (per investigator's choice of taxanes, capecitabine, or vinorelbine). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with a noninferiority upper margin of 1.35 for the HR. The intention-to-treat population was used in primary and safety analyses. Results: A total of 392 patients were enrolled and assigned randomly to receive trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy (ET group, n = 196) or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (CT group, n = 196). After a median follow-up of 30.2 months [interquartile range (IQR) 15.0–44.7], the median PFS was 19.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.7–21.7)] in the ET group and 14.8 months (12.8–16.8) in the CT group (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71–1.09; Pnoninferiority < 0.0001). A significantly higher prevalence of toxicity was observed in the CT group compared with the ET group. Conclusions: Trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy was noninferior to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HR+HER2+ MBC.
The cover image is based on the Original Article Metronomic chemotherapy of cyclophosphamide plus methotrexate in advanced breast cancer: Real-world data and experience of one center (CHJC-D-19-00380) by Shusen Wang et al., https://doi.
1003 Background: For metastatic breast cancer with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive, no evidence showed that which first-line regimens were preferred, either anti-HER2 therapy plus endocrine therapy or anti-HER2 therapy plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to determine whether trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy is as efficacious as trastuzumab plus chemotherapy and with decreased toxic effects. Methods: We conducted an open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial at nine hospitals in China. Patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (CT group) or endocrine therapy (ET group). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival with a non-inferiority upper margin of 1.35 for the hazard ratio (HR). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01950182. Results: Between Sep 16, 2013, and Dec 28, 2019, 392 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy (n = 196) or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (n = 196). In the intention-to-treat population, the median PFS was 14.8 months (95% CI 12.8-16.8) in the CT group and 19.2 months (95% CI 16.7-21.7) in the ET group (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71-1.09; Pnon-inferiority < 0.0001). Significantly higher frequency of toxicities were observed in CT group compared with ET group, including: leucopenia (98 [50%] vs 13 [6.6%]), nausea (93 [47%] vs 24 [12%]), fatigue (47 [24%] vs 31 [16%]), vomiting (45 [23%] vs 12 [6%]), headache (65 [33%] vs 24 [12%]) and alopecia (125 [64%] vs 8 [4%]). No patients died from treatment-related causes. Conclusions: Trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy was non-inferior to and had decreased toxicities to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive. Trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy could provide more convenient treatment and allow better treatment tolerance. Clinical trial information: NCT01950182 .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.