BackgroundSepsis is one of the most common diseases that seriously threaten human health. Although a large number of markers related to sepsis have been reported in the last two decades, the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers remains unclear due to the lack of similar baselines among studies. Therefore, we conducted a large systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of biomarkers from studies that included non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients as a control group.MethodsWe searched Medline, Embase and the reference lists of identified studies beginning in April 2014. The last retrieval was updated in September 2016.ResultsUltimately, 86 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Sixty biomarkers and 10,438 subjects entered the final analysis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the 7 most common biomarkers, including procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1, presepsin, lipopolysaccharide binding protein and CD64, were 0.85, 0.77, 0.79, 0.85, 0.88, 0.71 and 0.96, respectively. The remaining 53 biomarkers exhibited obvious variances in diagnostic value and methodological quality.ConclusionsAlthough some biomarkers displayed moderate or above moderate diagnostic value for sepsis, the limitations of the methodological quality and sample size may weaken these findings. Currently, we still lack an ideal biomarker to aid in the diagnosis of sepsis. In the future, biomarkers with better diagnostic value as well as a combined diagnosis using multiple biomarkers are expected to solve the challenge of the diagnosis of sepsis.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3591-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Inflammatory response following spinal cord injury (SCI) is important in regulation of the repair process. Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and Schwann cells (SCs) are important donor cells for repairing SCI in different animal models. However, synergistic or complementary effects of co-transplantation of both cells for this purpose have not been extensively investigated. In the present study, we investigated the effects of co-transplantation of OECs and SCs on expression of pro- or anti-inflammatory factor and polarization of macrophages in the injured spinal cord of rats. Mixed cell suspensions containing OECs and SCs were transplanted into the injured site at 7 days after contusion at the vertebral T10 level. Compared with the DMEM, SC, or OEC group, the co-transplantation group had a more extensive distribution of the grafted cells and significantly reduced number of astrocytes, microglia/macrophage infiltration, and expression of chemokines (CCL2 and CCL3) at the injured site. The co-transplantation group also significantly increased arginase/CD206 macrophages (IL-4) and decreased iNOS/CD16/32 macrophages (IFN-γ), which was followed by higher IL-10 and IL-13 and lower IL-6 and TNF-α in their expression levels, a smaller cystic cavity area, and improved motor functions. These results indicate that OEC and SC co-transplantation could promote the shift of the macrophage phenotype from M(IFN-γ) to M(IL-4), reduce inflammatory cell infiltration in the injured site, and regulate inflammatory factors and chemokine expression, which provide a better immune environment for SCI repair.

PHD finger protein 19 (PHF19), a critical component of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), is crucial for maintaining the repressive transcriptional activity of several developmental regulatory genes and plays essential roles in various biological processes. Abnormal expression of PHF19 causes dysplasia or serious diseases, including chronic myeloid disorders and tumors. However, the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of PHF19 in glioblastoma (GBM) remain unclear. Here, we demonstrated that PHF19 expression was positively associated with GBM progression, including cell proliferation, migration, invasion, chemosensitivity, and tumorigenesis. Using XAV-939, a Wnt/β-catenin inhibitor, we found that the effects of PHF19 on GBM cells were β-catenin-dependent. We also demonstrated that PHF19 expression was positively correlated with cytoplasmic β-catenin expression. PHF19 stabilized β-catenin by inhibiting the transcription of seven in absentia homolog 1 (SIAH1), an E3 ubiquitin ligase of β-catenin, through direct binding to the SIAH1 promoter region. Taken together, our results revealed the novel PHF19-SIAH1–β-catenin axis as a potential and promising therapeutic target.