AIMSThe UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) runs a national spontaneous reporting system (Yellow Card [YC] Scheme) to collect 'suspected' adverse drug reaction (ADR) data. We aim to describe the content and utility of YC reports received for patients aged <2 years. METHODSData on all ADRs reported using YC in infants aged <2 years from the years 2001-10 were supplied by the MHRA. RESULTSFor infants age <2 years, 3496 suspected ADRs were reported using YC (paternal medication pre-conception n = 3, transplacental n = 246, transmammary n = 30, neonates n = 97, infant n = 477, and vaccinations n = 2673), averaging 0.96 YC per day. There was a male preponderance (male 49.1%, female 44.4%, unknown 6.5%), and only 34 (1.0%) of YC reports stated a gestational age. The medications most frequently reported were: transplacental and transmammary (fluoxetine, n = 21 and n = 4 respectively), neonate (swine flu vaccine, n = 8) infant (oseltamivir, n = 37) and vaccines (meningococcal vaccine, n = 693). Paternal, transmammary, neonatal and infant YC did not reflect clinical concerns raised by the UK regulator. Transplacental and vaccination reports did correlate with some of the changes in practice and clinical alerts received. CONCLUSIONSThe frequency of YC reports for those <2 years is low, neonates are poorly represented, and recording of gestational age is poor. With the exception of vaccinations, spontaneous reports alone are not currently generating the data required, and important safety messages from the regulator do not match reporting patterns. Additional reporting strategies are required to improve the quantity and quality of suspected ADR data in young children.
Background VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, auto-inflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a newly described auto-inflammatory disease. Many cases feature pulmonary infiltrates or respiratory failure. This systematic review aimed to summarize respiratory manifestations in VEXAS syndrome described to date. Methods Databases were searched for articles discussing VEXAS syndrome until May 2022. The research question was: What are the pulmonary manifestations in patients with VEXAS syndrome? The search was restricted to English language and those discussing clinical presentation of disease. Information on basic demographics, type and prevalence of pulmonary manifestations, co-existing disease associations and author conclusions on pulmonary involvement were extracted. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews. Results Initially, 219 articles were retrieved with 36 ultimately included (all case reports or series). A total of 269 patients with VEXAS were included, 98.6% male, mean age 66.8 years at disease onset. The most frequently described pulmonary manifestation was infiltrates (43.1%; n = 116), followed by pleural effusion (7.4%; n = 20) and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (3.3%; n = 9). Other pulmonary manifestations were: nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (n = 1), bronchiolitis obliterans (n = 3), pulmonary vasculitis (n = 6), bronchiectasis (n = 1), alveolar haemorrhage (n = 1), pulmonary embolism (n = 4), bronchial stenosis (n = 1), and alveolitis (n = 1). Several patients had one or more co-existing autoimmune/inflammatory condition. It was not reported which patients had particular pulmonary manifestations. Conclusion This is the first systematic review undertaken in VEXAS patients. Our results demonstrate that pulmonary involvement is common in this patient group. It is unclear if respiratory manifestations are part of the primary disease or a co-existing condition. Larger epidemiological analyses will aid further characterisation of pulmonary involvement and disease management.
A literature review on new-onset autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTDs) following COVID-19 is lacking. We evaluated potential associations between COVID-19 and the development of new-onset ACTDs. The “population” was adults with disease terms for ACTDs, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjogren’s syndrome, systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM), anti-synthetase syndrome, mixed CTD and undifferentiated CTD, and “intervention” as COVID-19 and related terms. Databases were searched for English-language articles published until September 2022. We identified 2236 articles with 28 ultimately included. Of the 28 included patients, 64.3% were female, with a mean age was 51.1 years. The USA reported the most cases (9/28). ACTD diagnoses comprised: 11 (39.3%) IIM (including four dermatomyositis); 7 (25%) SLE; four (14.3%) anti-synthetase syndrome; four (14.3%) SSc; two (7.1%) other ACTD (one lupus/MCTD overlap). Of eight, four (14.3%) patients (including that with lupus/MCTD) had lupus nephritis. The average time from COVID-19 to ACTD diagnosis was 23.7 days. A third of patients were admitted to critical care, one for treatment of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in SLE (14 sessions of plasmapheresis, rituximab and intravenous corticosteroids) and nine due to COVID-19. 80% of patients went into remission of ACTD following treatment, while three (10%) patients died—one due to macrophage activation syndrome with anti-synthetase syndrome and two from unreported causes. Our results suggest a potential association between COVID-19 and new-onset ACTDs, notably in young females, reflecting more comprehensive CTD epidemiology. The most common diagnosis in our cohort was IIM. The aetiology and mechanisms by which ACTDs emerge following COVID-19 remain unknown and require further research.
Asthma affects 4.3 million of UK adults. Long-term inhaled therapies are the mainstay of management (1). Latest evidence suggests that control is rarely optimized in practice with poor inhaler technique as a prominent contributor (2-4). Currently there are no routine practices to optimize inhaler technique in asthmatic adults presenting with non-asthma related illness to our hospital. We developed a quality improvement project to optimize inhaler techniques in our patients during their acute admission. METHODS:Admitted adults with diagnosis of asthma, at least on one inhaler, were identified via electronic records by the lead pharmacist over an eight week period. To standardize our assessment process, a proforma was developed containing the seven basic steps pertinent to all inhalers as per UK Inhaler Group's competency document. (5)Patients' techniques were checked as per the proforma by a doctor or senior medical student. Corrections were made as necessary to meet the agreed gold-standard criteria. Re-assessment for recall of education in these patients was then carried out at a maximum of 48 hours.RESULTS: Forty patients were originally assessed over an eight week period with thirty-one being re-assessed within a maximum of 48 hours. Nine patients were lost to follow up due to unexpected out of hour discharge.On average each patient was on two different inhalers with Ventolin (Salbutamol) and Fostair (Beclomethasone) most frequently prescribed. On our initial assessment, two patients completed all steps with no errors which was in contrast to only two patients self-identifying their techniques as "suboptimal" prior to our review. Five patients used adjunct devices (aero-chamber or Volumatic) and nine patients had a comorbidity which adversely affected their techniques, such as mild to severe dementia, disabling stroke or poorly-controlled arthritis. Prior to our intervention, there was an average of 2.3 steps missed by each patient. The most commonly missed were steps one (not preparing the device), six (not holding breath for up to 10 seconds after delivering the dose) and seven (not waiting for a few seconds before attempting the second dose). On re-assessment, there was a reduction to an average of 1.1 points missed per patient. Post intervention, seven patients achieved all steps thoroughly with three not having any recollection of consultations.CONCLUSIONS: Incorrect inhaler use in asthmatic adults is unacceptably high in our cohort with inversely low self-awareness of this fact by our patients. A variety of reasons could account for this high incorrect use of medications, including receiving little or no advice at the time of initiation of therapy in the community, being instructed in a busy clinic by a non-asthma specialist clinician (with less attention and plan for follow up) and a lack of recent and up to date assessment of the technique.Careful instruction, observation of taught techniques and frequent assessment of inhaler techniques could show an overall improvement in use of these medications in ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.