Background and PurposeThe Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG 2016), a Japanese‐specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in February 2017 in Japanese. An English‐language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese‐language version.MethodsMembers of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine were selected and organized into 19 committee members and 52 working group members. The guidelines were prepared in accordance with the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) creation procedures. The Academic Guidelines Promotion Team was organized to oversee and provide academic support to the respective activities allocated to each Guideline Creation Team. To improve quality assurance and workflow transparency, a mutual peer review system was established, and discussions within each team were open to the public. Public comments were collected once after the initial formulation of a clinical question (CQ), and twice during the review of the final draft. Recommendations were determined to have been adopted after obtaining support from a two‐thirds (>66.6%) majority vote of each of the 19 committee members.ResultsA total of 87 CQs were selected among 19 clinical areas, including pediatric topics and several other important areas not covered in the first edition of the Japanese guidelines (J‐SSCG 2012). The approval rate obtained through committee voting, in addition to ratings of the strengths of the recommendation and its supporting evidence were also added to each recommendation statement. We conducted meta‐analyses for 29 CQs. Thirty seven CQs contained recommendations in the form of an expert consensus due to insufficient evidence. No recommendations were provided for 5 CQs.ConclusionsBased on the evidence gathered, we were able to formulate Japanese‐specific clinical practice guidelines that are tailored to the Japanese context in a highly transparent manner. These guidelines can easily be used not only by specialists, but also by non‐specialists, general clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, clinical engineers, and other healthcare professionals.

SummaryRecombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) is a novel class of anticoagulants for treating disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Although rhTM is widely used in clinical settings throughout Japan, there is limited clinical evidence supporting the use of rhTM in patients with sepsis-induced DIC. Furthermore, rhTM is not approved for DIC treatment in other countries. This study aimed to clarify the survival benefits of rhTM administration in critically ill patients. Data from 3,195 consecutive adult patients who were admitted to 42 intensive care units for the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock between January 2011 and December 2013 were retrospectively analysed, and 1,784 patients were diagnosed with DIC based on the scoring algorithm from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC (n = 645, rhTM group; n = 1,139, control group). Propensity score matching created 452 matched pairs, and logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between rhTM administration and lower in-hospital all-cause mortality in the propensity score-matched groups (odds ratio, 0.757; 95 % confidence interval, 0.574–0.999, p = 0.049). Inverse probability of treatment weighted and quintile-stratified analyses also revealed significant associations between rhTM administration and lower in-hospital all-cause mortality. Survival time in the propensity score-matched rhTM group was significantly longer than that in the propensity score-matched control group (hazard ratio, 0.781; 95 % confidence interval, 0.624–0.977, p = 0.03). Bleeding complications were not more frequent in the rhTM groups. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that rhTM administration is associated with reduced in-hospital all-cause mortality among patients with sepsis-induced DIC.

Introduction Sivelestat is neutrophil elastase inhibitor, which is widely used in Japan for the treatment of acute lung injury. However, the clinical efficacy of the medication has not been convincingly demonstrated. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on sivelestat for the treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Studies were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, conference proceedings, and references of included studies. Authors were contacted if necessary. ICHUSHI, the Japanese database for medical literature and conference proceedings was also used for the search, since many studies on sivelestat were published in Japanese language and not registered in major databases such as MEDLINE. The primary outcome was mortality within 28-30 days after randomization. Relative risks were pooled with the random effect model. Results 8 trials were included in the analysis. There was no difference in mortality within 28-30 days after randomization (relative risk 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.26). Subgroup analysis conducted only on studies conducted in Japan showed the same result (0.59, 0.28 to 1.28). There was no difference in mechanical ventilation days (standardized mean difference -0.43, -1.12 to 0.27), but sivelestat was associated with a better short term PaO2/FiO2 ratio (0.30, 0.05 to 0.56). Heterogeneity was not significant for the main analysis and funnel plot did not suggest publication bias. Conclusion Sivelestat was not associated with decreased mortality, even when including studies published in Japanese language.

Background and purposeThe Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J-SSCG 2016), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in February 2017 and published in the Journal of JSICM, [2017; Volume 24 (supplement 2)] 10.3918/jsicm.24S0001 and Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine [2017; Volume 28, (supplement 1)] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jja2.2017.28.issue-S1/issuetoc.This abridged English edition of the J-SSCG 2016 was produced with permission from the Japanese Association of Acute Medicine and the Japanese Society for Intensive Care Medicine.MethodsMembers of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine were selected and organized into 19 committee members and 52 working group members. The guidelines were prepared in accordance with the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) creation procedures. The Academic Guidelines Promotion Team was organized to oversee and provide academic support to the respective activities allocated to each Guideline Creation Team. To improve quality assurance and workflow transparency, a mutual peer review system was established, and discussions within each team were open to the public. Public comments were collected once after the initial formulation of a clinical question (CQ) and twice during the review of the final draft. Recommendations were determined to have been adopted after obtaining support from a two-thirds (> 66.6%) majority vote of each of the 19 committee members.ResultsA total of 87 CQs were selected among 19 clinical areas, including pediatric topics and several other important areas not covered in the first edition of the Japanese guidelines (J-SSCG 2012). The approval rate obtained through committee voting, in addition to ratings of the strengths of the recommendation, and its supporting evidence were also added to each recommendation statement. We conducted meta-analyses for 29 CQs. Thirty-seven CQs contained recommendations in the form of an expert consensus due to insufficient evidence. No recommendations were provided for five CQs.ConclusionsBased on the evidence gathered, we were able to formulate Japanese-specific clinical practice guidelines that are tailored to the Japanese context in a highly transparent manner. These guidelines can easily be used not only by specialists, but also by non-specialists, general clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, clinical engineers, and other healthcare professionals.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40560-017-0270-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract