Health literacy plays an important role in reproductive knowledge and may impact behaviors and outcomes. While further research is necessary, healthcare providers should utilize health literacy best practices now to promote high-quality care for patients.
Background
Emergency department use is common among pregnant women. Non-urgent emergency department use may represent care that would be better provided by an established obstetric provider in an ambulatory setting.
Objective
To identify socio-demographic factors associated with non-urgent emergency department use in pregnancy.
Study Design
This is a cross-sectional study of women recruited during their postpartum hospitalization. Data regarding prenatal care and emergency department visits was collected from medical records; participants completed a survey with questions regarding demographics and emergency department use. Urgency of an emergency department visit was pre-specified based on a-priori criteria abstracted from medical record review. Women with any non-urgent emergency department use were compared with women without non-urgent emergency department use. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with non-urgent emergency department use.
Results
Two hundred and thirty-three women participated in this study; 197 (84%) received care in the emergency department during pregnancy. Eighty-three (35.6%) women had at least one visit to the emergency department that was non-urgent. In regression analysis, increased odds of non-urgent emergency department use was associated with a preferred language other than English (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.01-4.05) and lack of private insurance (OR 5.55, 95% CI 2.54-12.12). The two most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department were concern that there was an emergency (45%) or being referred by a healthcare provider (36%).
Conclusion
Women frequently use the emergency department during pregnancy, including visits for non-urgent indications. Identifying risk factors for non-urgent emergency department use in pregnancy is important for identifying women likely to use the emergency department, including for non-urgent visits, and the development of strategies to decrease non-urgent emergency department utilization in pregnancy.
Overall positive attitudes toward HPV self-collection compared with Pap testing among underscreened women suggest that self-collection is a promising option to increase cervical cancer screening in this high-risk population.
Background: Young adult women find it acceptable to be offered the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine postpartum. Little is known about the practice of administering the HPV vaccine during the postpartum period. Materials and Methods: The Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to develop a cohort of privately insured 18 to 26-year-old women with uncomplicated live-born pregnancies. Eligibility required no previous doses of HPV vaccine before delivery and continuous insurance enrollment from June 2006 through 1 year postpartum. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: A total of 51,913 women meet age and enrollment criteria, with 3912 (7.5%) having received any doses of vaccine before their delivery, leaving 48,001 women in this cohort. In the year postpartum, 861 women (1.8%) received any HPV vaccine. Of the women initiating the vaccine, only 337 (39%) completed the threevaccine series. Women who received the vaccine, compared with women who did not, were younger (21 vs. 23 years old), more often the dependent to the insurance beneficiary (56% vs. 30%), and were more likely to have had an abnormal pap smear in the year prior (19.6% vs. 9.1%) or postdelivery (16.4% vs. 4.9). More women completed the HPV vaccine series when initiated within 2 months postpartum compared with women initiating the vaccine series >2 months postpartum (44% vs. 38%). Conclusions: Postpartum women are eligible for the HPV vaccine, yet very few are receiving it. The postpartum period is a missed opportunity for administration of this cancer-preventing vaccine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.