In a scheduling game, each player owns a job and chooses a machine to execute it. While the social cost is the maximal load over all machines (makespan), the cost (disutility) of each player is the completion time of its own job. In the game, players may follow selfish strategies to optimize their cost and therefore their behaviors do not necessarily lead the game to an equilibrium. Even in the case there is an equilibrium, its makespan might be much larger than the social optimum, and this inefficiency is measured by the price of anarchy -the worst ratio between the makespan of an equilibrium and the optimum. Coordination mechanisms aim to reduce the price of anarchy by designing scheduling policies that specify how jobs assigned to a same machine are to be scheduled. Typically these policies define the schedule according to the processing times as announced by the jobs. One could wonder if there are policies that do not require this knowledge, and still provide a good price of anarchy. This would make the processing times be private information and avoid the problem of truthfulness. In this paper we study these so-called non-clairvoyant policies. In particular, we study the RANDOM policy that schedules the jobs in a random order without preemption, and the EQUI policy that schedules the jobs in parallel using time-multiplexing, assigning each job an equal fraction of CPU time.For these models we study two important questions, the existence of Nash equilibria and the price of anarchy. We show that the game under RANDOM policy is a potential game for uniform machines or for two unrelated machines. However, it is not a potential game for three or more unrelated machines. Moreover, we prove that the game under the EQUI policy is a potential game.Next, we analyze the inefficiency of EQUI policy. Interestingly, the (strong) price of anarchy of EQUI, a non-clairvoyant policy, is asymptotically the same as that of the best strongly local policy -policies in which a machine may look at the processing time of jobs assigned to it. The result also indicates that knowledge of jobs' characteristics is not necessarily needed.

We study online scheduling problems on a single processor that can be viewed as extensions of the well-studied problem of minimizing total weighted flow time. In particular, we provide a framework of analysis that is derived by duality properties, does not rely on potential functions and is applicable to a variety of scheduling problems. A key ingredient in our approach is bypassing the need for "black-box" rounding of fractional solutions, which yields improved competitive ratios.We begin with an interpretation of Highest-Density-First (HDF) as a primal-dual algorithm, and a corresponding proof that HDF is optimal for total fractional weighted flow time (and thus scalable for the integral objective). Building upon the salient ideas of the proof, we show how to apply and extend this analysis to the more general problem of minimizing j w j g(F j ), where w j is the job weight, F j is the flow time and g is a non-decreasing cost function. Among other results, we present improved competitive ratios for the setting in which g is a concave function, and the setting of same-density jobs but general cost functions. We further apply our framework of analysis to online weighted completion time with general cost functions as well as scheduling under polyhedral constraints.

International audienceWe present an unified approach to study online scheduling problems in the resource augmentation/speed scaling models. Potential function method is extensively used for analyzing algorithms in these models; however, they yields little insight on how to construct potential functions and how to design algorithms for related problems. In the paper, we generalize and strengthen the dual-fitting technique proposed by Anand et al. [1]. The approach consists of considering a possibly non-convex relaxation and its Lagrangian dual; then constructing dual variables such that the Lagrangian dual has objective value within a desired factor of the primal optimum. The competitive ratio follows by the standard Lagrangian weak duality. This approach is simple yet powerful and it is seemingly a right tool to study problems with resource augmentation or speed scaling. We illustrate the approach through the following results

We consider an online scheduling problem, motivated by the issues present at the joints of networks using ATM and TCP/IP. Namely, IP packets have to broken down to small ATM cells and sent out before their deadlines, but cells corresponding to different packets can be interwoven. More formally, we consider the online scheduling problem with preemptions, where each job j is revealed at release time r j , has processing time p j , deadline d j and weight w j . A preempted job can be resumed at any time. The goal is to maximize the total weight of all jobs completed on time. Our main result are as follows: we prove that if all jobs have processing time exactly k, the deterministic competitive ratio is between 2.598 and 5, and when the processing times are at most k, the deterministic competitive ratio is Θ(k/ log k).