Combination of atom probe tomography, isotope-labelling and online electrochemical mass spectrometry provides direct correlation of atomic scale structure of Ir oxide catalysts with the mechanism of oxygen formation from the lattice atoms.

The development of efficient acidic water electrolyzers relies on understanding dynamic changes of the Ir-based catalytic surfaces during the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Such changes include degradation, oxidation, and amorphization processes, each of which somehow affects the material’s catalytic performance and durability. Some mechanisms involve the release of oxygen atoms from the oxide’s lattice, the extent of which is determined by the structure of the catalyst. While the stability of hydrous Ir oxides suffers from the active participation of lattice oxygen atoms in the OER, rutile IrO2 is more stable and the lattice oxygen involvement is still under debate due to the insufficient sensitivity of commonly used online electrochemical mass spectrometry. Here, we revisit the case of rutile IrO2 at the atomic scale by a combination of isotope labeling and atom probe tomography and reveal the exchange of oxygen atoms between the oxide lattice and water. Our approach enables direct visualization of the electrochemically active volume of the catalysts and allows for the estimation of an oxygen exchange rate during the OER that is discussed in view of surface restructuring and subsequent degradation. Our work presents an unprecedented opportunity to quantitatively assess the exchange of surface species during an electrochemical reaction, relevant for the optimization of the long-term stability of catalytic systems.

Porosity of shales is an important parameter that impacts rock strength for seal or wellbore integrity, gas-in-place calculations for unconventional resources or the diffusional solute and gas transport in these microporous materials. From a well section obtained from the Mont Terri Underground Rock Laboratory in St Ursanne, Switzerland, we determined porosity, pore size distribution and specific surface areas on a set of 13 Opalinus Clay samples. The porosity methods employed are helium-pycnometry, water and mercury injection porosimetry, liquid saturation and immersion, and low pressure N2 sorption, as well as small-angle to ultra-small-angle neutron scattering (SANS–USANS). These were used in addition to mineralogical and geochemical methods for sample analysis that comprise X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, total organic carbon content and cation exchange capacity. We find large variations in total porosity, ranging from approximately 23% for the neutron-scattering method to approximately 10% for mercury injection porosimetry. These differences can partly be related to differences in pore accessibility, while no or negligible inaccessible porosity was found. Pore volume distributions between neutron scattering and low-pressure sorption compare very well but differ significantly from those obtained from mercury porosimetry: this is realistic since the latter provides information on pore throats only, and the two former methods on pore throats and pore bodies. Finally, we find that specific surface areas determined using low-pressure sorption and neutron scattering match well.

No abstract