Rationale: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the main cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results for PGD risk factors. Objectives: We sought to identify donor, recipient, and perioperative risk factors for PGD. Methods: We performed a 10-center prospective cohort study enrolled between March 2002 and December 2010 (the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group). The primary outcome was International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 3 PGD at 48 or 72 hours posttransplant. The association of potential risk factors with PGD was analyzed using multivariable conditional logistic regression. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1,255 patients from 10 centers were enrolled; 211 subjects (16.8%) developed grade 3 PGD. In multivariable models, independent risk factors for PGD were any history of donor smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.6; P ¼ 0.002); FI O 2 during allograft reperfusion (OR, 1.1 per 10% increase in FI O 2 ; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2; P ¼ 0.01); single lung transplant (OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3; P ¼ 0.008); use of cardiopulmonary bypass (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.2-5.3; P , 0.001); overweight (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7; P ¼ 0.01) and obese (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9; P ¼ 0.004) recipient body mass index; preoperative sarcoidosis (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.6; P ¼ 0.03) or pulmonary arterial hypertension (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.7; P ¼ 0.002); and mean pulmonary artery pressure (OR, 1.3 per 10 mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P , 0.001). PGD was significantly associated with 90-day (relative risk, 4.8; absolute risk increase, 18%; P , 0.001) and 1-year (relative risk, 3; absolute risk increase, 23%; P , 0.001) mortality. Conclusions: We identified grade 3 PGD risk factors, several of which are potentially modifiable and should be prioritized for future research aimed at preventative strategies. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00552357). What This Study Adds to the FieldWe performed a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 1,255 lung transplant recipients across 10 US transplant centers. We identified receipt of an organ from a donor with any smoking history, elevated FI O 2 during allograft reperfusion, preoperative sarcoidosis or pulmonary arterial hypertension, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, single lung transplant, large-volume blood product transfusion, elevated pulmonary arterial pressures, and overweight or obese recipient body habitus as risk factors for grade 3 PGD. Several of these risk factors are potentially modifiable, and thus may suggest preventative strategies, whereas other risk factors should be prioritized for future mechanistic research efforts.

Rationale: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the main cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results for PGD risk factors. Objectives: We sought to identify donor, recipient, and perioperative risk factors for PGD. Methods: We performed a 10-center prospective cohort study enrolled between March 2002 and December 2010 (the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group). The primary outcome was International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 3 PGD at 48 or 72 hours posttransplant. The association of potential risk factors with PGD was analyzed using multivariable conditional logistic regression. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1,255 patients from 10 centers were enrolled; 211 subjects (16.8%) developed grade 3 PGD. In multivariable models, independent risk factors for PGD were any history of donor smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.6; P ¼ 0.002); FI O 2 during allograft reperfusion (OR, 1.1 per 10% increase in FI O 2 ; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2; P ¼ 0.01); single lung transplant (OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3; P ¼ 0.008); use of cardiopulmonary bypass (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.2-5.3; P , 0.001); overweight (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7; P ¼ 0.01) and obese (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9; P ¼ 0.004) recipient body mass index; preoperative sarcoidosis (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.6; P ¼ 0.03) or pulmonary arterial hypertension (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.7; P ¼ 0.002); and mean pulmonary artery pressure (OR, 1.3 per 10 mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P , 0.001). PGD was significantly associated with 90-day (relative risk, 4.8; absolute risk increase, 18%; P , 0.001) and 1-year (relative risk, 3; absolute risk increase, 23%; P , 0.001) mortality. Conclusions: We identified grade 3 PGD risk factors, several of which are potentially modifiable and should be prioritized for future research aimed at preventative strategies. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00552357). What This Study Adds to the FieldWe performed a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 1,255 lung transplant recipients across 10 US transplant centers. We identified receipt of an organ from a donor with any smoking history, elevated FI O 2 during allograft reperfusion, preoperative sarcoidosis or pulmonary arterial hypertension, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, single lung transplant, large-volume blood product transfusion, elevated pulmonary arterial pressures, and overweight or obese recipient body habitus as risk factors for grade 3 PGD. Several of these risk factors are potentially modifiable, and thus may suggest preventative strategies, whereas other risk factors should be prioritized for future mechanistic research efforts.

Background & Aims-Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) affects 10%-30% of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, but the impact on functional status, quality of life, and survival is poorly defined. We assessed the impact of HPS in patients evaluated for liver transplantation.

Purpose Limited data are available on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods We examined the clinical features and outcomes of 190 patients treated with ECMO within 14 days of ICU admission, using data from a multicenter cohort study of 5122 critically ill adults with COVID-19 admitted to 68 hospitals across the United States. To estimate the effect of ECMO on mortality, we emulated a target trial of ECMO receipt versus no ECMO receipt within 7 days of ICU admission among mechanically ventilated patients with severe hypoxemia (PaO 2 /FiO 2 < 100). Patients were followed until hospital discharge, death, or a minimum of 60 days. We adjusted for confounding using a multivariable Cox model. Results Among the 190 patients treated with ECMO, the median age was 49 years (IQR 41–58), 137 (72.1%) were men, and the median PaO 2 /FiO 2 prior to ECMO initiation was 72 (IQR 61–90). At 60 days, 63 patients (33.2%) had died, 94 (49.5%) were discharged, and 33 (17.4%) remained hospitalized. Among the 1297 patients eligible for the target trial emulation, 45 of the 130 (34.6%) who received ECMO died, and 553 of the 1167 (47.4%) who did not receive ECMO died. In the primary analysis, patients who received ECMO had lower mortality than those who did not (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.41–0.74). Results were similar in a secondary analysis limited to patients with PaO 2 /FiO 2 < 80 (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.40–0.77). Conclusion In select patients with severe respiratory failure from COVID-19, ECMO may reduce mortality. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-020-06331-9.

The effect of dosage of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) on survival in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) is unknown. In this study, 200 critically ill patients with ARF were randomly assigned to receive CVVHDF with prefilter replacement fluid at an effluent rate of either 35 ml/kg per h (high dosage) or 20 ml/kg per h (standard dosage). The primary study outcome, survival to the earlier of either intensive care unit discharge or 30 d, was 49% in the high-dosage arm and 56% in the standard-dosage arm (odds ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.32; P ϭ 0.32). Among hospital survivors, 69% of those in the high-dosage arm recovered renal function compared with 80% of those in the standard-dosage arm (P ϭ 0.29); therefore, a difference in patient survival or renal recovery was not detected between patients receiving high-dosage or standard-dosage CVVHDF.