AIMTo define clinical criteria to differentiate eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder (EoGD) in the esophagus.METHODSOur criteria were defined based on the analyses of the clinical presentation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), subepithelial eosinophilic esophagitis (sEoE) and eosinophilic esophageal myositis (EoEM), identified by endoscopy, manometry and serum immunoglobulin E levels (s-IgE), in combination with histological and polymerase chain reaction analyses on esophageal tissue samples.RESULTSIn five patients with EoE, endoscopy revealed longitudinal furrows and white plaques in all, and fixed rings in two. In one patient with sEoE and four with EoEM, endoscopy showed luminal compression only. Using manometry, failed peristalsis was observed in patients with EoE and sEoE with some variation, while EoEM was associated with hypercontractile or hypertensive peristalsis, with elevated s-IgE. Histology revealed the following eosinophils per high-power field values. EoE = 41.4 ± 7.9 in the epithelium and 2.3 ± 1.5 in the subepithelium; sEoE = 3 in the epithelium and 35 in the subepithelium (conventional biopsy); EoEM = none in the epithelium, 10.7 ± 11.7 in the subepithelium (conventional biopsy or endoscopic mucosal resection) and 46.8 ± 16.5 in the muscularis propria (peroral esophageal muscle biopsy). Presence of dilated epithelial intercellular space and downward papillae elongation were specific to EoE. Eotaxin-3, IL-5 and IL-13 were overexpressed in EoE.CONCLUSIONBased on clinical and histological data, we identified criteria, which differentiated between EoE, sEoE and EoEM, and reflected a different pathogenesis between these esophageal EoGDs.

The long-term outcome after ESD for MM/SM1 ESCC was favorable with additional prophylactic therapy and strict adherence to follow-up. These results indicate that our management decision based on LVI is a valid approach and that ESD can be offered as a therapeutic option to MM/SM1 ESCCs.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Involuntary weight loss related to cachexia is common in patients with advanced cancer, but the association between body composition changes and survival is still unclear in pancreatic cancer. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 55 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing palliative therapy or best supportive care (BSC). The skeletal muscle index (SMI), visceral adipose tissue index (VATI), subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI), and visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR) were calculated based on the cross‐sectional area on two sets of computed tomography images obtained at cancer diagnosis and 1 month later before treatment. The prognostic value of body composition indexes at diagnosis and the changes in those indexes over 1 month was then evaluated. Results In total, 45 patients (81.8%) received chemotherapy, chemoradiation, or radiation therapy, whereas the remaining patients underwent BSC. There were 27 patients (49.1%) who had low SMI at cancer diagnosis. Univariate analysis showed no significant associations between the baseline body composition indexes including SMI, VATI, SATI, and VSR and survival. Meanwhile, male sex (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.16–6.71, p = 0.022) and higher decrease in VATI over 1 month (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.13–5.13, p = 0.023) were identified as independent risk factors for mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Rapid decline in VAT over 1 month is closely associated with poorer survival in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. A short‐term assessment of body composition changes may be a rational approach to predict prognosis in these patients.