Drug repositioning is an emerging approach to developing novel cancer treatments. Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for cancer treatment, but it could attenuate its anticancer activity by activating the mTOR pathway. The HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin reportedly activates the mTOR inhibitor AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK), and we thought that it would potentiate vorinostat's anticancer activity in renal cancer cells. The combination of vorinostat and fluvastatin induced robust apoptosis and inhibited renal cancer growth effectively both in vitro and in vivo. Vorinostat activated the mTOR pathway, as evidenced by the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6, and fluvastatin inhibited this phosphorylation by activating AMPK. Fluvastatin also enhanced vorinostat‐induced histone acetylation. Furthermore, the combination induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress that was accompanied by aggresome formation. We also found that there was a positive feedback cycle among AMPK activation, histone acetylation, and ER stress induction. This is the first study to report the beneficial combined effect of vorinostat and fluvastatin in cancer cells.
There is no curative treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Causing ubiquitinated protein accumulation and endoplasmic reticulum stress is a novel approach to cancer treatment. The HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir has been reported to suppress heat shock protein 90 and increase the amount of unfolded proteins in the cell. If the proteasome functions normally, however, they are rapidly degraded. We postulated that the novel proteasome inhibitor ixazomib combined with ritonavir would kill bladder cancer cells effectively by inhibiting degradation of these unfolded proteins and thereby causing ubiquitinated proteins to accumulate. The combination of ritonavir and ixazomib induced drastic apoptosis and inhibited the growth of bladder cancer cells synergistically. The combination decreased the expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin‐dependent kinase 4, and increased the sub‐G1 fraction significantly. Mechanistically, the combination caused ubiquitinated protein accumulation and endoplasmic reticulum stress. The combination‐induced apoptosis was markedly attenuated by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, suggesting that the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins played an important role in the combination's antineoplastic activity. Furthermore, the combination induced histone acetylation cooperatively and the decreased expression of histone deacetylases was thought to be one mechanism of this histone acetylation. The present study provides a theoretical basis for future development of novel ubiquitinated‐protein‐accumulation‐based therapies effective against bladder cancer.
Panobinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, induces histone acetylation and acts against cancer but attenuates its anticancer activity by activating the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a cellular energy sensor that reportedly inhibits the mTOR pathway. The antidiabetic drug metformin is also a potent AMPK activator and we investigated whether it augmented panobinostat's antineoplastic activity in bladder cancer cells (UMUC3, J82, T24 and MBT-2). Metformin enhanced panobinostat-induced apoptosis and the combination inhibited the growth of bladder cancer cells cooperatively in vitro and in vivo . As expected, metformin increased the phosphorylation of AMPK and decreased the panobinostat-caused phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein, thus inhibiting the panobinostat-activated mTOR pathway. The AMPK activation was shown to play a pivotal role in the combination's action because the AMPK inhibitor compound C attenuated the combination's anticancer activity. Furthermore, the AMPK activation by metformin enhanced panobinostat-induced histone and non-histone acetylation. This acetylation was especially remarkable in the proteins in the detergent-insoluble fraction, which would be expected if the combination also induced endoplasmic reticulum stress.
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor nelfinavir acts against malignancies by inducing endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. The HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir, on the other hand, not only induces ER stress but also inhibits P-glycoprotein's pump activity and thereby enhances the effects of its substrate drugs. We therefore postulated that ritonavir in combination with nelfinavir would kill bladder cancer cells effectively by inducing ER stress cooperatively and also enhancing nelfinavir's effect. Nelfinavir was shown to be a P-glycoprotein substrate, and the combination of nelfinavir and ritonavir inhibited bladder cancer cell growth synergistically. It also suppressed colony formation significantly. The combination significantly increased the number of cells in the sub-G1 fraction and also the number of annexin V+ cells, confirming robust apoptosis induction. The combination induced ER stress synergistically, as evidenced by the increased expression of glucose-regulated protein 78, ER-resident protein 44, and endoplasmic oxidoreductin-1-like protein. It also increased the expression of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor AMP-activated protein kinase and caused dephosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein, demonstrating that the combination also inhibited the mTOR pathway. We also found that the combination enhanced histone acetylation synergistically by decreasing the expression of HDACs 1, 3, and 6.
Background/Aim: Induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a novel approach to cancer treatment. This study investigated the ability of the clinically feasible combination of the human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors lopinavir and ritonavir to induce ER stress killing urological cancer cells. Materials and Methods: Renal cancer cells (769-P, 786-O) and bladder cancer cells (UMUC-3, T-24) were used to investigate the ability of the combination to induce ER stress and its mechanism of action. Results: The combination inhibited the growth of both renal and bladder cancer cells synergistically by inducing ER stress. The combination-induced ER stress increased the expression of AMP-activated protein kinase and suppressed the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. It also increased the expression of a tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor and thereby sensitized the cancer cells to TRAIL. Conclusion: The combination of lopinavir and ritonavir acts against urological cancer cells by inducing ER stress synergistically. Materials and Methods Cell culture. Human renal cancer cells (769-P, 786-O) and human bladder cancer cells (UMUC-3, T-24) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). The cells were cultured in either Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium 1640 (769-P and 786-O cells), Minimum Essential Medium (UMUC-3 cells), or McCoy's 5A medium (T-24 cells) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1.0% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37˚C under 5% CO 2 in a humidified incubator. Reagents and antibodies. Ritonavir purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, ON, Canada) and lopinavir purchased from Selleck (Houston, TX, USA) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Cycloheximide purchased from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY, USA) was dissolved in distilled water. Human recombinant TRAIL purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) was dissolved in sterile phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. These solutions were stored at −80˚C or −20˚C until use. Primary antibodies for western blotting were used against the following: survivin and death receptor 5 (DR5) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), S6 ribosomal protein, phosphorylated S6, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1), and 5891 This article is freely accessible online.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.