High expression levels of TrkB and BDNF are associated with aggressive malignant behavior in tumor cells and a poor prognosis in patients with various types of cancer. In this study, we aimed to identify the relationship between TrkB and BDNF expression and clinicopathological variables and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated TrkB and BDNF expression in the tumor cells of 102 NSCLC patients by immunohistochemistry. Out of all clinicopathological factors examined, only vascular invasion was significantly correlated with TrkB (P=0.010) and BDNF (P=0.015) expression. TrkB-positive tumors had significantly worse disease-free survival (P=0.0094) and overall survival (P=0.0019) than TrkB-negative tumors, and TrkB expression was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (HR 3.735, 95% CI 1.560-11.068, P=0.002) and overall survival (HR 4.335, 95% CI 1.534-15.963, P=0.004) in multivariate analysis. Finally, our analysis revealed that co-expression of TrkB and BDNF conferred poorer prognosis compared with overexpression of either protein alone. Our results indicate that expression of TrkB and BDNF is associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients.

No abstract

No abstract

These results further implicate nicotine in lung carcinogenesis, and suggest that α1 nAChR may be a biomarker for EGFR-TKI treatment and also a personalizing target molecule for patients with smoking-related lung cancer.

The presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) somatic mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer patients is associated with response to treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib. More than 100 mutations in the kinase domain of EGFR have been identified. In particular there are many variations of deletion mutations in exon 19. In this study, using yellow fluorescent protein-tagged fragments of the EGFR intracellular domain, we examined the differences in sensitivity to gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib between several exon 19 mutants and other common EGFR mutations. We also used serum of patients undergoing treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this system. In addition, we examined the relative kinase activity of these mutants by measuring relative fluorescent intensity after immunofluorescence staining. We found that both sensitivity to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and relative kinase activity differed among several EGFR mutations found in the same region of the kinase domain. This study underscores the importance of reporting the clinical outcome of treatment in relation to different EGFR mutations. (Cancer Sci 2013; 104: 584-589)