Background & Aims
The drug-induced liver injury network (DILIN) is conducting a prospective study of patients with DILI in the United States. We present characteristics and subgroup analyses from the first 1257 patients enrolled in the study.
Methods
In an observational longitudinal study, we began collecting data on eligible individuals with suspected DILI in 2004, following them for 6 months or longer. Subjects were evaluated systematically for other etiologies, causes, and severity of DILI.
Results
Among 1257 enrolled subjects with suspected DILI, the causality was assessed in 1091 patients, and 899 were considered to have definite, highly likely, or probable DILI. Ten percent of patients died or underwent liver transplantation and 17% had chronic liver injury. In the 89 patients (10%) with pre-existing liver disease, DILI appeared to be more severe than in those without (difference not statistically significant; P=.09) and mortality was significantly higher (16% vs 5.2%; P<.001). Azithromycin was the implicated agent in a higher proportion of patients with pre-existing liver disease compared to those without liver disease (6.7% vs. 1.5%, p=0.006). Forty-one cases with latency ≤ 7 days were caused predominantly by antimicrobial agents (71%). Two most common causes for 60 DILI cases with latency >365 days were nitrofurantoin (25%) or minocycline (17%). There were no differences in outcomes of patients with short vs long latency of DILI. Compared to individuals younger than 65 y, individuals 65 y or older (n=149) were more likely to have cholestatic injury, although mortality and rate of liver transplantation did not differ. Nine patients (1%) had concomitant severe skin reactions; implicated agents were lamotrigine, azithromycin, carbamazepine, moxifloxacin, cephalexin, diclofenac, and nitrofurantoin. Four of these patients died.
Conclusion
Mortality from DILI is significantly higher in individuals with pre-existing liver disease or concomitant severe skin reactions compared to patients without. Further studies are needed to confirm the association between azithromycin and increased DILI in patients with chronic liver disease. Older age and short or long latencies are not associated with DILI mortality.
Determination of the restenosis rate after multilesion percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is an important consideration in defining expanded indications for the procedure. Of 209 patients who underwent successful multilesion coronary angioplasty, 55 symptomatic and 74 asymptomatic patients were restudied an average of 7 +/- 4 months after dilation. The restenosis rate was 82% (45 of 55) in the symptomatic patients and 30% (22 of 74) in the asymptomatic patients (p less than 0.001). Only 4% of the asymptomatic patients had restenosis at more than one dilation site. When only patients who developed a restenosis were considered, the restenosis occurred at more than one dilation site in 47% (21 of 45) of the symptomatic group versus 14% (3 of 22) of the asymptomatic group (p less than 0.05). When all recurrent stenoses were examined, the severity of the luminal narrowing was greater than or equal to 70% in 64% (45 of 70) of the stenotic lesions in the symptomatic patients versus 31% (8 of 26) of the stenotic lesions in the asymptomatic patients (p less than 0.05). Proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease, increased length of the stenotic narrowing, male gender and diabetes were associated with an increased incidence of restenosis by multivariate analysis. Patient-related variables were not predictive of multilesion restenosis. In conclusion, the majority of patients are clinically improved after multilesion coronary angioplasty. Recurrent symptoms after multilesion coronary angioplasty are frequently associated with multilesion restenosis and a more severe degree of restenotic narrowing. Restenosis at more than one dilation site is uncommon in the asymptomatic patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.