No abstract

Reticular erythematous mucinosis (REM) is a rare cutaneous condition often referred to as plaque-like mucinosis and midline mucinosis. Although the exact etiology remains undefined, efforts to elucidate pathogenesis, disease associations, and prospective treatment modalities have been encouraging. Induction of the disease has been associated with viral processes, solar irradiation, specific cell lines, and cytokines such as Interleukin (IL)-1β. Clinically, patients typically develop erythematous macules and papules that coalesce into reticulated patterns on the midline of the chest or back. The lesions have a tendency to respond to systemic antimalarial therapy, but novel therapeutic approaches with ultraviolet A1 light (UVA1) and pulse dye laser (PDL) have been promising. Histologically, REM is associated with a mild, predominantly lymphocytic infiltrate with variable deep perivascular extension. Mucin may be seen in the upper and mid dermis and is prominent around the infiltrate and appendages. IgM deposits may be visualized under direct immunoflourescence along the basal layer. Because of the similarities between REM and tumid lupus, the two disease processes have often been grouped together. The remarkable overlap between the two diseases suggests that the two conditions may actually be the same disease.

IMPORTANCE There remains little experimental evidence and no randomized clinical trial to date to confirm the benefit of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for facial rejuvenation. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether PRP injection improves the visual appearance, including texture and color, of photodamaged facial skin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial, participants and raters were masked to groupings. The setting was an academic-based, urban outpatient dermatology practice in Chicago, Illinois. Participants were adults aged 18 to 70 years with bilateral cheek rhytids of Glogau class II or greater. The duration of the study was August 21, 2012, to February 16, 2016. INTERVENTIONS Each participant received 3 mL intradermal injections of PRP to one cheek and sterile normal saline to the contralateral cheek. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were photoaging scores (with subscores for fine lines, mottled pigmentation, roughness, and sallowness) as rated by 2 masked dermatologists. Secondary outcomes included participant self-assessment scores of improvement on a 5-point scale (worsening, no change, mild improvement, moderate improvement, or significant improvement), participant overall satisfaction scores on a 4-point scale (not satisfied, slightly satisfied, moderately satisfied, or very satisfied), and participant-reported or investigator-observed adverse events. RESULTS Of 27 enrolled participants, 19 (mean [SD] age, 46.37 [10.88] years; 17 female) were analyzed. Reported adverse events, which were not associated with the study agent, included redness (n = 18), swelling (n = 16), bruising (n = 14), pruritus (n = 1), skin scaling (n = 1), and dryness of skin (n = 1). No participants reported any adverse events at 12 months. Mean (SD) photoaging scores rated by 2 dermatologists showed no significant difference between PRP and normal saline for fine lines (baseline, 1.

Our ability to treat vitiligo may be imperfect, but through appropriate patient selection and careful application of one or more of these advanced therapies, successful treatment of vitiligo, even in patients refractory to treatment, can be achieved.

No abstract