PurposeGallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-18) would offer advantages with respect to availability, production amount, and image resolution. [18F]DCFPyL is a promising F-18-labeled candidate for PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging that has been recently introduced. In the current study, we aimed to compare [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC and [18F]DCFPyL for clinical use in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer.ProceduresIn 14 selected patients with PSA relapse of prostate cancer, [18F]DCFPyL PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) was performed in addition to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. A systematic comparison was carried out between results obtained with both tracers with regard to the number of detected PSMA-positive lesions, the standardized uptake value (SUV)max and the lesion to background ratios.ResultsAll suspicious lesions identified by [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC were also detected with [18F]DCFPyL. In three patients, additional lesions were observed using [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT. The mean SUVmax in the concordant [18F]DCFPyL PSMA-positive lesions was significantly higher as compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (14.5 vs. 12.2, p = 0.028, n = 15). The mean tumor to background ratios (n = 15) were significantly higher for [18F]DCFPyL compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC using kidney, spleen, or parotid as reference organs (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, p = 0.008), but no significant differences were found using the liver (p = 0.167) or the mediastinum (p = 0.363) as reference organs.Conclusion[18F]DCFPyL PET/CT provided a high image quality and visualized small prostate lesions with excellent sensitivity. [18F]DCFPyL represents a highly promising alternative to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET/CT imaging in relapsed prostate cancer.

Several studies outlined the sensitivity of Ga-labeled PET tracers against the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for localization of relapsed prostate cancer in patients with renewed increase in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), commonly referred to as biochemical recurrence. Labeling of PSMA tracers withF offers numerous advantages, including improved image resolution, longer half-life, and increased production yields. The aim of this study was to assess the PSA-stratified performance of the F-labeled PSMA tracerF-DCFPyL and the Ga-labeled referenceGa-PSMA-HBED-CC. We examined 191 consecutive patients with biochemical recurrence according to standard acquisition protocols usingF-DCFPyL ( = 62, 269.8 MBq, PET scan at 120 min after injection) or Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC ( = 129, 158.9 MBq, 60 min after injection). We determined PSA-stratified sensitivity rates for both tracers and corrected our calculations for Gleason scores using iterative matched-pair analyses. As an orthogonal validation, we directly compared tracer distribution patterns in a separate cohort of 25 patients, sequentially examined with both tracers. After prostatectomy ( = 106), the sensitivity of both tracers was significantly associated with absolute PSA levels ( = 4.3 × 10). Sensitivity increased abruptly, when PSA values exceeded 0.5 μg/L ( = 2.4 × 10). For a PSA less than 3.5 μg/L, most relapses were diagnosed at a still limited stage ( = 3.4 × 10). For a PSA of 0.5-3.5 μg/L, PSA-stratified sensitivity was 88% (15/17) for F-DCFPyL and 66% (23/35) forGa-PSMA-HBED-CC. This significant difference was preserved in the Gleason-matched-pair analysis. Outside of this range, sensitivity was comparably low (PSA < 0.5 μg/L) or high (PSA > 3.5 μg/L). After radiotherapy ( = 85), tracer sensitivity was largely PSA-independent. In the 25 patients examined with both tracers, distribution patterns of F-DCFPyL andGa-PSMA-HBED-CC were strongly comparable ( = 2.71 × 10). However, in 36% of the PSMA-positive patients we detected additional lesions on the F-DCFPyL scan ( = 3.7 × 10). Our data suggest thatF-DCFPyL is noninferior to Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC, while offering the advantages ofF labeling. Our results indicate that imaging with F-DCFPyL may even exhibit improved sensitivity in localizing relapsed tumors after prostatectomy for moderately increased PSA levels. Although the standard acquisition protocols, used forF-DCFPyL and Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC in this study, stipulate different activity doses and tracer uptake times after injection, our findings provide a promising rationale for validation ofF-DCFPyL in future prospective trials.

Cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) are still an interesting and viable alternative for drug delivery applications. CPPs contain considerably high amounts of positively charged amino acids, imparting them with cationic character. Tumor cells are characterized by an enhanced anionic nature of their membrane surface, a property that could be used by CPPs to target these cells. We recently identified a branched CPP that displays a high internalization capacity while exhibiting selectivity for certain tumor cell types. In this study we elucidated this observation in greater detail by investigating the underlying mechanism behind the cellular uptake of this peptide. An additional cytotoxicity screen against several cancer cell lines indeed demonstrates high cytotoxic activity against cancer cells over normal fibroblasts. Furthermore, we show that this feature can be used for delivering the anticancer drug actinomycin D with high efficiency in the MCF‐7 cancer cell line.

Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) is of potential value for the diagnosis of malignant tumours. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of FDG PET in patients with breast tumours, appraising its applicability in visualising primary carcinomas and regional metastases in a clinical setting. Results of FDG PET were compared with those of mammography, breast ultrasonography and histology in 30 patients with inconclusive breast findings. For PET, transmission and emission images were taken in one or two scan positions, depending on the available time and the clinical status of patients. PET showed focal FDG uptake with high contrast in 21 of 23 primary carcinomas. In one patient, only PET correctly visualized multifocal disease (three foci, O 0.4-1 cm). The accuracy of PET in the detection of primary breast cancer was 90%, and in the detection of involved axillary lymph nodes, 94%. All metastases (lymph nodes, lungs, bones, soft tissues) covered by the field of view and demonstrated by other methods (X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scan) showed FDG uptake. In three patients, only PET initiated further diagnostic procedures. The results indicate that FDG PET can provide a rapid diagnostic study (45-60 min) and allows accurate tumour staging of several organ systems for primary tumour and metastases with a single imaging study in a routine clinical setting.

The observation of a similar cell persistence after IC injections with and without balloon occlusion suggests that the balloon procedures currently applied in clinical studies are not necessary for cell deposit. If longer term persistence of cells plays a role for the clinical benefit of cardiac cell therapy, IM injection may be superior to IC applications.