Introduction: The hepatocyte growth factor receptor mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) is reported to be a negative prognostic marker in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and involved in resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Emibetuzumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal bivalent MET antibody, blocks ligand-dependent and ligand-independent hepatocyte growth factor/MET signaling. This phase 2 study compared erlotinib with and without emibetuzumab in first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC.

The PCE combination increased PFS, but it was not significantly superior to PC in this phase II study.

AP-D and AC-D are well tolerated and active as NST in EBC. Of note, AC-D had a higher pCR rate in HR-negative tumors, whereas AP-D had more activity if HRs were expressed.

This phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Chemonaive patients >/=60-year-old with FIGO stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were enrolled. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg /m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg /m2 on day 1 (before cisplatin) and day 8 of a 21-day cycle. Of 44 female patients (median age, 70 years), 72.7% had stage IIIC disease and 67.4% had a Karnofsky performance status >/=80. Of the 37 response-evaluable patients (35 with measurable lesion[s] >/=2 cm), there were seven (18.9%) pathologic complete responses, two (5.4%) pathologic partial responses, two (5.4%) clinical complete responses, and 12 (32.4%) clinical partial responses, for an overall response rate of 62.2% (95% CI, 44.8%-77.5%), and a pathologic response rate of 24.3% (95% CI, 11.8%-41.2%). Median survival was 27.7 months (95% CI, 14.3-40.8 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 59.5% and 30.2% of patients, respectively, with neutropenic fever in one patient. Grade 3 nausea /vomiting and alopecia occurred in 25.6% and 9.5% of patients, respectively. We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active and feasible as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in patients >/=60 years. Further clinical trials adding gemcitabine to current standard, first-line treatment seem warranted in younger as well as older patients.

9019 Background: MET expression is a mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibition in EGFRmt NSCLC and correlated with poor prognosis. Emi (LY2875358) is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal bivalent MET antibody that blocks ligand dependent and independent HGF/MET signaling. This Phase 2 study compared the clinical activity of Emi + E versus single agent E in 1st line EGFRmt metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Stage IV, EGFRmt NSCLC pts with disease control following an 8-week lead-in E (150 mg PO QD) treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive Emi (750 mg IV Q2W) + E or E alone. Pts were stratified by ECOG PS, ethnicity, MET expression status, and response at the end of the lead-in. The primary endpoint was PFS from randomization. Additional endpoints included safety, OS, PK, and exploratory analysis of MET-expressing populations. Results: Out of181 pts enrolled, 141 pts were randomized (Emi+E: 71; E: 70). In the ITT population, median PFS for EMI+E was 9.3 months (m) compared with 9.5 m for E (HR = 0.89: 90% CI 0.64-1.23; p = 0.534). Exploratory analysis of MET-high expressing pts (MET 3+ expression in ≥90% of tumor cells; n = 24 pts) showed a 15.3 m improvement in PFS (EMI+E: 20.7 m; E: 5.4 m [HR: 0.39; 90% CI: 0.17-0.91]). No difference in PFS was observed in the complementary population (HR: 1.1 [90% CI: 0.7-1.7]). Similar frequencies of related AEs were reported for both treatment arms. Drug-related TEAEs that were more frequent ( > 10%) for Emi+E were peripheral edema and fatigue (all grade 1 or 2). Emi serum concentrations were consistent with previously obtained PK results, and no apparent exposure-response was observed. Median OS in the ITT population was not achieved (NA) for either arm. In MET-high expressing pts, median OS was 20.6 m for E (90% CI: 8.87, NA) whereas it was not achieved for Emi+E (90% CI: NA, NA). Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in PFS was noted in the ITT population.Exploratory analysis confirmed that high MET expression is a negative prognostic marker for pts treated with E and indicated that these pts may receive clinically meaningful benefit from Emi+E. Clinical trial information: NCT01897480.