Background Data on patients with COVID-19 who have cancer are lacking. Here we characterise the outcomes of a cohort of patients with cancer and COVID-19 and identify potential prognostic factors for mortality and severe illness.Methods In this cohort study, we collected de-identified data on patients with active or previous malignancy, aged 18 years and older, with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection from the USA, Canada, and Spain from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) database for whom baseline data were added between March 17 and April 16, 2020. We collected data on baseline clinical conditions, medications, cancer diagnosis and treatment, and COVID-19 disease course. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days of diagnosis of COVID-19. We assessed the association between the outcome and potential prognostic variables using logistic regression analyses, partially adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and obesity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701, and is ongoing. FindingsOf 1035 records entered into the CCC19 database during the study period, 928 patients met inclusion criteria for our analysis. Median age was 66 years (IQR 57-76), 279 (30%) were aged 75 years or older, and 468 (50%) patients were male. The most prevalent malignancies were breast (191 [21%]) and prostate (152 [16%]). 366 (39%) patients were on active anticancer treatment, and 396 (43%) had active (measurable) cancer. At analysis (May 7, 2020), 121 (13%) patients had died. In logistic regression analysis, independent factors associated with increased 30-day mortality, after partial adjustment, were: increased age (per 10 years; partially adjusted odds ratio 1•84, 95% CI 1•53-2•21), male sex (1•63, 1•07-2•48), smoking status (former smoker vs never smoked: 1•60, 1•03-2•47), number of comorbidities (two vs none: 4•50, 1•33-15•28), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher (status of 2 vs 0 or 1: 3•89, 2•11-7•18), active cancer (progressing vs remission: 5•20, 2•77-9•77), and receipt of azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine (vs treatment with neither: 2•93, 1•79-4•79; confounding by indication cannot be excluded). Compared with residence in the US-Northeast, residence in Canada (0•24, 0•07-0•84) or the US-Midwest (0•50, 0•28-0•90) were associated with decreased 30-day all-cause mortality. Race and ethnicity, obesity status, cancer type, type of anticancer therapy, and recent surgery were not associated with mortality. Interpretation Among patients with cancer and COVID-19, 30-day all-cause mortality was high and associated with general risk factors and risk factors unique to patients with cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the effect of COVID-19 on outcomes in patients with cancer, including the ability to continue specific cancer treatments.

The dose finding study of 54 patients showed a higher response rate for patients given 1.3 mg/m 2 compared with 1.0 mg/m 2 twice weekly for two of the 3-week schedule, but the study was too small for statistical dose-response comparisons. The most commonly reported adverse events were asthenic conditions (including fatigue, malaise, and weakness) in 65%, nausea (64%), diarrhea (51%), appetite decreased (including anorexia; 43%), constipation (43%), thrombocytopenia (43%), peripheral neuropathy (37%, including peripheral sensory neuropathy and peripheral neuropathy aggravated), pyrexia (36%), vomiting (36%), and anemia (32%).Conclusions: The FDA granted marketing approval to Millennium Pharmaceuticals on May 13, 2003 for bortezomib for use as a single agent for the treatment of multiple myeloma in patients who have received at least two prior therapies and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. Accelerated approval was based on a surrogate end point of response rate rather than clinical benefit, such as an improvement in survival. The recommended dose of bortezomib is 1.3 mg/m 2 administered twice weekly for 2 weeks (days 1, 4, 8, and 11) followed by a 10-day rest period (days 12-21). Accelerated approval was based on the results of two Phase II studies in a total of 256 patients and additional Phase I safety information. Mandated Phase IV study commitments to characterize clinical efficacy and safety more precisely are discussed.

NOL showed minimal activity in this phase III trial. Further exploration at this dose and schedule in HCC is not warranted.

Purpose: To describe the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review and approval of erlotinib (Tarceva, OSI Pharmaceuticals, Melville, NY) for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non^small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Experimental Design: The FDA reviewed raw data in electronic format from a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing erlotinib with placebo in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Results: Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (erlotinib, n = 488 and placebo, n = 243). Erlotinib was superior to placebo for survival, progression-free survival, and tumor response rate. Exploratory analyses indicate that epidermal growth factor receptor status may be an important predictor of the erlotinib survival effect. Rash (75% versus 17%) and diarrhea (54% versus 18%) in the erlotnib and placebo group respectively were the most common adverse events. Severe rash occurred in 9% and severe diarrhea in 6% of erlotinib-treated patients and each resulted in study discontinuation in 1% of patients. Dose reductions were required for 10% of patients with rash and 4% of patients with diarrhea. Conclusions: On November18, 2004, the FDA granted erlotinib regular approval for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. The applicant has committed to conduct post-marketing clinical trials to assess further the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor expression, measured with immunohistochemical staining, on erlotinib treatment effect.Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States (1). Initial therapy for advanced non -small lung cancer (NSCLC) is systemic chemotherapy with a two-drug combination regimen that often includes a platinum. Docetaxel and pemetrexed are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as the second-line chemotherapy. Recently, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib was granted FDA-accelerated approval under subpart H for treatment of advanced NSCLC after failure of both platinum-based and docetaxel chemotherapy, based on a response rate of f10% in single-arm clinical trials. Erlotinib (T arceva, OSI Pharmaceuticals, Melville, NY) inhibits EGFR tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation by inhibition of the intracellular domain. Studies in cell lines and enzyme assays have both shown that erlotinib inhibits EGFR at concentrations significantly lower than those needed to inhibit c-src and v-abl. Whereas erlotinib was more selective for EGFR tyrosine kinase than it was for several other tyrosine kinases tested, several other tyrosine kinases in the same family as EGFR were not tested. Although erlotinib seems rather selective for EGFR, insufficient data exist to make a definitive decision regarding selectivity (2 -4). Chemistry and ToxicologyErlotinib hydrochloride is a quin...