ObjectiveTo assess the association of baseline imaging markers of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) and brain frailty with clinical outcome after acute stroke in the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) trial.MethodsENOS randomized 4,011 patients with acute stroke (<48 hours of onset) to transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) or no GTN for 7 days. The primary outcome was functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) at day 90. Cognition was assessed via telephone at day 90. Stroke syndrome was classified with the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification. Brain imaging was adjudicated masked to clinical information and treatment and assessed SVD (leukoaraiosis, old lacunar infarcts/lacunes, atrophy) and brain frailty (leukoaraiosis, atrophy, old vascular lesions/infarcts). Analyses used ordinal logistic regression adjusted for prognostic variables.ResultsIn all participants and those with lacunar syndrome (LACS; 1,397, 34.8%), baseline CT imaging features of SVD and brain frailty were common and independently associated with unfavorable shifts in mRS score at day 90 (all participants: SVD score odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–1.24; brain frailty score OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.17–1.34; those with LACS: SVD score OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15–1.47, brain frailty score OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.14–1.44). Brain frailty was associated with worse cognitive scores at 90 days in all participants and in those with LACS.ConclusionsBaseline imaging features of SVD and brain frailty were common in lacunar stroke and all stroke, predicted worse prognosis after all acute stroke with a stronger effect in lacunar stroke, and may aid future clinical decision-making.IdentifierISRCTN99414122.

A simple, low-cost intervention in the community phase of stroke recovery aiming to promote self-directed rehabilitation improved outcomes.

T reatment options for acute ischemic stroke are limited to thrombolysis, aspirin, hemicraniectomy and stroke unit care, [1][2][3][4] and mechanical thrombectomy. [5][6][7] Although there are no definitive treatments for acute intracerebral hemorrhage, lowering blood pressure (BP) might be beneficial. 8 As a result, new interventions are still needed and, ideally, ones that are simple to administer and relevant irrespective of stroke type so that they can be given prehospital or immediately on admission to hospital before neuroimaging.Nitric oxide (NO) donors are a candidate treatment for acute stroke. [9][10][11] In preclinical studies, NO donors reduced lesion size and increased cerebral blood flow, but only if given early. 12 In multiple pilot randomized controlled trials, NO donors (specifically intravenous sodium nitroprusside and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate [GTN]) reduced BP, pulse pressure, variability, and peak systolic BP; maintained cerebral blood flow (in spite of BP reduction); and improved arterial compliance. [13][14][15][16][17] Although sodium nitroprusside attenuated platelet function, GTN had no effect on platelets, 13,14 suggesting that it could be given to patients whether they had ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. In a small trial of GTN administered by paramedics before hospital admission (with median time toBackground and Purpose-Nitric oxide donors are candidate treatments for acute stroke, potentially through hemodynamic, reperfusion, and neuroprotectant effects, especially if given early. Although the large Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) trial of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was neutral, a prespecified subgroup suggested that GTN improved functional outcome if administered early after stroke onset. Methods-Prospective analysis of subgroup of patients randomized into the ENOS trial within 6 hours of stroke onset.Safety and efficacy of GTN versus no GTN were assessed using data on early and late outcomes. Results-Two hundred seventy-three patients were randomized within 6 hours of ictus: mean (SD) age, 69.9 (12.7) years; men, 154 (56.4%); ischemic stroke, 208 (76.2%); Scandinavian Stroke Scale, 32.1 (11.9); and total anterior circulation syndrome, 86 (31.5%). When compared with no GTN, the first dose of GTN lowered blood pressure by 9.4/3.3 mm Hg (P<0.01, P=0.064) and shifted the modified Rankin Scale to a better outcome by day 90, adjusted common odds ratio, 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.80). Significant beneficial effects were also seen with GTN for disability (Barthel Index), quality of life (EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale), cognition (telephone Mini-Mental State Examination), and mood (Zung Depression Scale admission of 55 minutes), GTN seemed to improve functional outcome, assessed as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). 17When assessed in a large international trial involving patients with stroke within 48 hours, GTN was safe to administer but did not alter mRS, the primary outcome. 18The potential benefit of GTN when administered early 17 suggested that the...

BackgroundTrials of fluoxetine for recovery after stroke report conflicting results. The Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recoverY (AFFINITY) trial aimed to determine if daily fluoxetine for 6 months after stroke improves functional outcome in Australasian and Vietnamese patients. MethodsAFFINITY was a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 43 hospital stroke units in Australia (n=29), New Zealand (4), and Vietnam (10). Eligible patients were adults with a clinical diagnosis of stroke in the previous 2-15 days and a persisting neurological deficit. Patients were randomised via a web-based system using a minimisation algorithm to once daily, oral fluoxetine 20mg or matching placebo for 6 months. Patients, investigators and outcome assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was functional outcome, measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS), at 6 months. The primary analysis was an ordinal logistic regression of the mRS at 6 months, adjusted for minimisation variables. Analyses were according to the patient's treatment allocation. The trial is registered with the ACTRN registry, number 12611000774921. FindingsPowered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation 1280 patients were recruited in Australia (n=532), New Zealand (n=42) and Vietnam (n=706) between 11 January 2013 and 30 June 2019; 642 were allocated fluoxetine and 638 placebo. Adherence to trial medication (mean 167 [SD 48] days) was similar between groups. At 6 months, mRS data were available in 624 (97.2%) patients allocated fluoxetine and 632 (99.1%) placebo. The distribution of mRS categories at 6 months was similar in the fluoxetine and placebo groups (adjusted common odds ratio 0.936, 95% CI 0.762-1.150; p=0.53), and consistent among all pre-defined subgroups. Compared to placebo, patients allocated fluoxetine had more falls (20 [3.12%] vs 7 [1.10%]; p=0.02), bone fractures (19 [2•96%] vs 6 [0.94%]; p=0.01) and epileptic seizures (10 [1.56%] vs 2 [0.31%]; p=0.04) at 6 months. InterpretationFluoxetine 20mg daily for 6 months after acute stroke did not improve functional outcome and increased the risk of falls, bone fractures, and seizures. These results do not support the use of fluoxetine to improve outcome after stroke.

Background and purpose: ''Take Charge'' is a novel, community-based self-directed rehabilitation intervention which helps a person with stroke take charge of their own recovery. In a previous randomized controlled trial, a single Take Charge session improved independence and health-related quality of life 12 months following stroke in M aori and Pacific New Zealanders. We tested the same intervention in three doses (zero, one, or two sessions) in a larger study and in a broader non-M aori and non-Pacific population with stroke. We aimed to confirm whether the Take Charge intervention improved quality of life at 12 months after stroke in a different population and whether two sessions were more effective than one. Methods:We randomized 400 people within 16 weeks of acute stroke who had been discharged to institution-free community living at seven centers in New Zealand to a single Take Charge session (TC1, n ¼ 132), two Take Charge sessions six weeks apart (TC2, n ¼ 138), or a control intervention (n ¼ 130). Take Charge is a ''talking therapy'' that encourages a sense of purpose, autonomy, mastery, and connectedness with others. The primary outcome was the Physical Component Summary score of the Short Form 36 at 12 months following stroke comparing any Take Charge intervention to control.Results: Of the 400 people randomized (mean age 72.2 years, 58.5% male), 10 died and two withdrew from the study. The remaining 388 (97%) people were followed up at 12 months after stroke. Twelve months following stroke, participants in either of the TC groups (i.e. TC1 þ TC2) scored 2.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.95 to 4.9, p ¼ 0.004) points higher (better) than control on the Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary. This difference remained significant when adjusted for pre-specified baseline variables. There was a dose effect with Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary scores increasing by 1.9 points (95% CI 0.8 to 3.1, p < 0.001) for each extra Take Charge session received. Exposure to the Take Charge intervention was associated with reduced odds of being dependent (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 5) at 12 months (TC1 þ TC2 12% versus control 19.5%, odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.99, p ¼ 0.045). Conclusions:Confirming the previous randomized controlled trial outcome, Take Charge-a low-cost, personcentered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention after stroke-improved health-related quality of life and independence.Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12615001163594

Background and Purpose-High plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) has been associated with cognitive impairment but lowering tHcy with B-vitamins has produced equivocal results. We aimed to determine whether B-vitamin supplementation would reduce tHcy and the incidence of new cognitive impairment among individuals with stroke or transient ischemic attack ≥6 months previously. Methods-A total of 8164 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack were randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with one tablet daily of B-vitamins (folic acid, 2 mg; vitamin B6, 25 mg; vitamin B12, 500 μg) or placebo and followed up for 3.4 years (median) in the VITAmins TO Prevent Stroke (VITATOPS) trial. For this prespecified secondary analysis of VITATOPS, the primary outcome was a new diagnosis of cognitive impairment, defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score <24 on ≥2 follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes were cognitive decline, and the mean tHcy and MMSE at final follow-up. Results-A total of 3089 participants (38%) voluntarily undertook the MMSE >6 months after the qualifying stroke; 2608 participants were cognitively unimpaired (MMSE ≥24), of whom 2214 participants (1110 B-vitamins versus 1104 placebo) had follow-up MMSEs during 2.8 years (median). At final follow-up, allocation to B-vitamins, compared with placebo, was associated with a reduction in mean tHcy (10.2 μmol/L versus 14.2 μmol/L; P<0.001) but no change from baseline in the mean MMSE score (−0.22 points versus −0.25 points; difference, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, −0.13 to 0.19; P=0.726) and no difference in the incidence of cognitive impairment (5.51% versus 5.47%; risk ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.48; P=0.976), cognitive decline (9.1% versus 10.3%; risk ratio, 0.89; 0.67-1.18; P=0.414), or cognitive impairment or decline (11.0% versus 11.3%; risk ratio, 0.98; 0.75-1.27; P=0.855). Conclusions-Daily supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 to a self-selected clinical trial cohort of cognitively unimpaired patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack lowered mean tHcy but had no effect on the incidence of cognitive impairment or cognitive decline, as measured by the MMSE, during a median of 2.

This study provides Class II evidence that a primary care electronic decision support tool improves guideline adherence and might reduce 90-day stroke risk.

SummaryBackgroundPrevious studies have suggested that any benefits of folic acid-based therapy to lower serum homocysteine in prevention of cardiovascular events might be offset by concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to establish whether there is an interaction between antiplatelet therapy and the effects of folic acid-based homocysteine-lowering therapy on major vascular events in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack enrolled in the vitamins to prevent stroke (VITATOPS) trial.MethodsIn the VITATOPS trial, 8164 patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack were randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with one tablet daily of placebo or B vitamins (2 mg folic acid, 25 mg vitamin B6, and 500 μg vitamin B12) and followed up for a median 3·4 years (IQR 2·0–5·5) for the primary composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular causes. In our post-hoc analysis of the interaction between antiplatelet therapy and the effects of treatment with B vitamins on the primary outcome, we used Cox proportional hazards regression before and after adjusting for imbalances in baseline prognostic factors in participants who were and were not taking antiplatelet drugs at baseline and in participants assigned to receive B vitamins or placebo. We also assessed the interaction in different subgroups of patients and different secondary outcomes. The VITATOPS trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00097669, and Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN74743444.FindingsAt baseline, 6609 patients were taking antiplatelet therapy and 1463 were not. Patients not receiving antiplatelet therapy were more likely to be younger, east Asian, and disabled, to have a haemorrhagic stroke or cardioembolic ischaemic stroke, and to have a history of hypertension or atrial fibrillation. They were less likely to be smokers and to have a history of peripheral artery disease, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, and a revascularisation procedure. Of the participants taking antiplatelet drugs at baseline, B vitamins had no significant effect on the primary outcome (488 patients in the B-vitamins group [15%] vs 519 in the placebo group [16%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·83–1·07). By contrast, of the participants not taking antiplatelet drugs at baseline, B vitamins had a significant effect on the primary outcome (123 in the B-vitamins group [17%] vs 153 in the placebo group [21%]; HR 0·76, 0·60–0·96). The interaction between antiplatelet therapy and the effect of B vitamins on the primary outcome was significant after adjusting for imbalance in the baseline variables (adjusted p for interaction=0·0204).InterpretationOur findings support the hypothesis that antiplatelet therapy modifies the potential benefits of lowering homocysteine with B-vitamin supplementation in the secondary prevention of major vascular events. If validated, B vitamins might have a role in the prevention of ischaemic events in high-risk individuals with an allergy, intolerance, or...