ObjectiveTo determine the factors affecting the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to identify models that predict patient and graft survival. Summary Background DataThe national epidemic of HCV infection has become the leading cause of hepatic failure that requires OLT. Rapidly increasing demands for OLT and depleted donor organ pools mandate appropriate selection of patients and donors. Such selection should be guided by a better understanding of the factors that influence the outcome of OLT. MethodsThe authors conducted a retrospective review of 510 patients who underwent OLT for HCV during the past decade. Seven donor, 10 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect outcome were dichotomized at the median for univariate screening. Factors that achieved a probability value less than 0.2 or that were thought to be relevant were entered into a stepdown Cox proportional hazard regression model. ResultsOverall patient and graft survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84%, 68%, and 60% and 73%, 56%, and 49%, respectively. Overall median time to HCV recurrence was 34 months after transplantation. Neither HCV recurrence nor HCV-positive donor status significantly decreased patient and graft survival rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, use of HCVpositive donors reduced the median time of recurrence to 22.9 months compared with 35.7 months after transplantation of HCV-negative livers. Stratification of patients into five subgroups, based on time of recurrence, revealed that early HCV recurrence was associated with significantly increased rates of patient death and graft loss. Donor, recipient, and operative variables that may affect OLT outcome were analyzed. On univariate analysis, recipient age, serum creatinine, donor length of hospital stay, donor female gender, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status of recipient, and presence of hepatocellular cancer affected the outcome of OLT. Elevation of pretransplant HCV RNA was associated with an increased risk of graft loss. Of 15 variables considered by multivariate Cox regression analysis, recipient age, UNOS status, donor gender, and log creatinine were simultaneous significant predictors for patient survival. Simultaneously significant factors for graft failure included log creatinine, log alanine transaminase, log aspartate transaminase, UNOS status, donor gender, and warm ischemia time. These variables were therefore entered into prognostic models for patient and graft survival.

Few studies have examined causes of death in long-term survivors of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We reviewed causes of death among 299 adult liver transplant recipients who survived more than 3 years after OLT at 2 centers. Thirty-eight of the 299 patients subsequently died. Nonhepatic causes accounted for 22 of 38 late deaths (58%). Death caused by malignancies occurred in 9 patients between 3.3 and 8.0 years after OLT. Eight patients died of cardiovascular complications. The 6 patients who died of myocardial infarction had risk factors for coronary artery disease. Hepatic failure caused by recurrent liver disease or chronic rejection accounted for 16 of 38 late deaths (42%). These 16 patients were younger than patients who died of nonhepatic complications (mean ages, 50.7 v 62.1 years; P ‫؍‬ .001). However, the mean interval between OLT and death was similar among patients who died of nonhepatic versus hepatic causes. Nine patients had recurrent liver disease leading to death, and 8 of 9 patients had recurrent chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Chronic rejection resulting in graft failure and death occurred in 7 patients. In summary, de novo malignancies and cardiovascular complications accounted for more than half the late deaths. Patients who died of nonhepatic causes were significantly older than patients who died of hepatic causes. Chronic rejection and recurrent HCV infection accounted for the majority of hepatic causes of death. With longer followup, graft failure resulting from recurrent HCV infection will become the major cause of death in late survivors. (Liver Transpl 2001;7:811-815.)

No abstract

We conclude that: (1) patient survival is influenced by IPRI only when it is extreme (ASTmax>5000 U/L), provided parameters of graft function are used in conjunction with aminotransferase values to assess the need for prompt retransplantation; (2) short-term graft survival is proportional to the extent of IPRI, but grafts that are not lost to PNF have equivalent 1- and 2-year survival irrespective of the magnitude of IPRI; (3) 40% of grafts with extreme IPRI are lost to PNF, but the same proportion also provide long-term function; and (4) for surviving grafts, long-term biochemical function as well as the incidence of biliary complications and of chronic rejection are unrelated to the extent of IPRI.

It is widely perceived that outcomes are relatively poor following retransplantation (reTX) for recurrent of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Transplant centers debate the utility of offering another liver to these patients. A U.S. study group was formed to retrospectively compare survival after reTX in patients with recurrent HCV (histologically proven) and those transplanted for other indications greater than 90 days after first transplantation, from 1996 to 2004. Patients were divided into 3 groups; group 1: HCV reTX (n ϭ 43), group 2: non-HCV reTX (n ϭ 73), and group 3: recurrent HCV but no reTX (n ϭ 156). They were predominantly male, Caucasian, with mean age of 47.2 yr. The commonest indications for non-HCV reTX were chronic rejection (36%), hepatic artery thrombosis (31%) and recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis (17%). Duration of hospitalization, number of intensive care unit (ICU) days, and time interval from listing to transplantation or reTX were similar between reTX groups. The 1-yr and 3-yr survival rates after reTX were also similar for HCV reTX and non-HCV reTX groups (1 yr, 69% vs. 73%; 3 yr, 49% vs. 55%). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were not predictive of survival from reTX. However, with a MELD score of Ͼ30 in the non HCV group, survival was Ͻ50%. In the recurrent HCV not undergoing reTX group, 30% were reevaluated for reTX but only 15% were listed for reTX and the 3-yr survival was 47%. The most common reasons for not listing for reTX were recurrent HCV within 6 months (22%), fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (19%), and renal dysfunction (9%). In conclusion, patients retransplanted for recurrent HCV had similar 1-yr and 3-yr survival when compared to patients undergoing reTX for other indications. MELD scores were not predictive of post-reTX survival. Survival was Ͻ50% in the non-HCV reTx group with MELD score of Ͼ30. Many patients with recurrent HCV are not considered for reTX and die from recurrent disease.