Being a carrier of a combination of polymorphisms of VKORC1 and CYP2C9, rather than of one of these polymorphisms, is associated with severe overanticoagulation. The time to achieve stability is mainly associated with the CYP2C9 genotype.

Background: The quality of oral anticoagulant therapy management with coumarin derivatives requires reliable results for the prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR). We assessed the effect on PT/INR of preanalytical variables, including ones related to off-site blood collection and transportation to a laboratory. Methods: Four laboratories with different combinations of blood collection systems, thromboplastin reagents, and coagulation meters participated. The simulated preanalytical variables included time between blood collection and PT/INR determinations on samples stored at room temperature, at 4 -6°C, and at 37°C; mechanical agitation at room temperature, at 4 -6°C, and at 37°C; time between centrifugation and PT/INR determination; and times and temperatures of centrifugation. For variables that affected results, the effect of the variable was classified as moderate when <25% of samples showed a change >10% or as large if >25% of samples showed such a change. Results: During the first 6 h after blood collection, INR changed by >10% in <25% of samples (moderate effect)

In carriers of the CYP2C9*3 allele more difficulties in terms of stabilization and overanticoagulation were found as compared with wild-type subjects or CYP2C9*2 carriers. CYP2C9 genotyping could be useful to identify potential candidates for more frequent INR controls to minimize problems with acenocoumarol anticoagulation status.

No abstract

Objective The objective of our study was to examine the management of the interaction between acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon and several antibiotics by anticoagulation clinics and to compare the consequences of this interaction on users of co-trimoxazole with those for users of other antibiotics. Methods A follow-up study was conducted at four anticoagulation clinics in The Netherlands. Data on measurements of the International Normalised Ratio (INR), application of a preventive dose reduction (PDR) of the coumarin anticoagulant, fever and time within or outside the therapeutic INR range were collected. Results The study cohort consisted of 326 subjects. A PDR was given more often to users of co-trimoxazole PDR than to users of other antibiotics. The PDR in co-trimoxazole users resulted in a significantly reduced risk of both moderate overanticoagulation (INR >4.5) and severe overanticoagulation (INR >6.0) compared with no PDR, with odds ratios (ORs) of 0.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01-0.51] and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.01-0.92), respectively. In co-trimoxazole users without PDR, the risk of overanticoagulation was significantly increased compared with users of other antibiotics. All co-trimoxazole users spent significantly more time under the therapeutic INR range during the first 6 weeks after the course than users of other antibiotics. Conclusion PDR is effective in preventing overanticoagulation in co-trimoxazole users, but results in a significantly prolonged period of underanticoagulation after the course. Avoidance of concomitant use of co-trimoxazole with acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon seems to be a safer approach than management of the interaction between these drugs.

We have developed a formula to predict the maintenance dosage of acenocoumarol. With this formula it is possible to install this maintenance dosage and thus achieve oral anticoagulant therapy within the therapeutic range at an earlier stage. This will have to be shown in a prospective study.

Within each patient treated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA), variation of the international normalised ratio (INR) occurs over the treatment period. The purpose of the present study was to assess INR variation in selected patients on long-term treatment in whom the dose of VKA was not changed. This type of variation is considered as "biological variation" which is caused by many factors but not VKA dose changes or other medication. Four groups of long-term patients were examined: each group with a different VKA (acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon) or a different target intensity (INR 2.0-3.5 or 2.5-4.0). All patients were monitored with the same PT system (Hepato Quick, STA-R Evolution coagulation instrument) by one laboratory. The variation of the INR within each patient was expressed as coefficient of variation (CV, in %). The CV was corrected for the average imprecision of the INR measurement (CV, 2.4%). The mean corrected CV values for the four groups were: 10.9% (acenocoumarol, target INR 2.0-3.5); 10.5% (acenocoumarol, target INR 2.5-4.0); 10.4% (phenprocoumon, target INR 2.0-3.5); 9.1% (phenprocoumon, target INR 2.5-4.0). The analytical performance goal for the INR measurement (imprecision) can be derived from the within-subject biological variation. Desirable INR imprecision goals are <4.9% and <5.3% CV for monitoring of phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol, respectively. These goals were achieved using the aforesaid PT system.

Background In a retrospective study we have developed a model which determines the dose of acenocoumarol based on the age of the patient and on the first INR obtained after a standard initial loading dose. The group of patients of this study was used as the control group of the present study. Aim The aim of this study was to prospectively validate the model and to assess whether the use of this model improves the quality of the treatment in the 0-2 months study period. Patients and methods In 197 patients the model was evaluated by (1) in the initial phase: comparison of INRs with the control group, after assessing the dose according to the model, and (2) in the 0-2 months period: calculation of the percentage of time spent in the therapeutic target range compared to the control group. Furthermore, the eventual dose was compared to the dose of the model when the INRs were within the therapeutic target range for the first time and on two successive occasions. Results (1) When dosed according to the model, 50% of INRs in the total group were within the therapeutic target range compared to 45% in the control group, and (2) the percentage time spent within this range was 68 in the total group compared to 63 in the control group (P = 0.0013). When the INRs were within the range for the first time and successively twice, the eventual doses were similar to the model in 59 and 50%, respectively. About 20% of the patients did not achieve two successive INRs within the range. Conclusions Using the model the quality of treatment improved. We advice to use a standardized individualized dose regimen at the initiation of vitamin K antagonist treatment.