Projections of glutamatergic somatosensory and auditory fibers to the cochlear nucleus (CN) are mostly nonoverlapping: projections from the spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5) terminate primarily in the granule cell domains (GCD) of CN, whereas type I auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) project to the magnocellular areas of the VCN (VCNm) and deep layers of Dorsal CN (DCN). Vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUTs), which selectively package glutamate into synaptic vesicles, have different isoforms associated with distinct subtypes of excitatory glutamatergic neurons. Here we examined the distributions of VGLUT1 and VGLU2 expression in the CN and their colocalization with Sp5 and ANF terminals following injections of anterograde tracers into Sp5 and the cochlea in the guinea pig. The CN regions that showed the most intense expression of VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 were largely nonoverlapping and were consistent with ANF and Sp5 projections, respectively: VGLUT1 was highly expressed in VCNm and the molecular layer of the DCN, whereas VGLUT2 was expressed predominantly in the GCD. Half (47% +/- 3%) of the Sp5 mossy fiber endings colabeled with VGLUT2, but few (2.5% +/- 1%) colabeled with VGLUT1. In contrast, ANFs colabeled predominantly with VGLUT1. The pathway-specific expression of VGLUT isoforms in the CN may be associated with the intrinsic synaptic properties that are unique to each sensory pathway.

Integration of multimodal information is essential for understanding complex environments. In the auditory system, multisensory integration first occurs in the cochlear nucleus (CN), where auditory nerve and somatosensory pathways converge (Shore, 2005). A unique feature of multisensory neurons is their propensity to receive cross-modal compensation following deafening. Based on our findings that the vesicular glutamate transporters, VGLUT1 and VGLUT2, are differentially associated with auditory nerve and somatosensory inputs to the CN, respectively (Zhou et al., 2007) we examined their relative distributions after unilateral deafening. One and two weeks after unilateral intra-cochlear injections of kanamycin, VGLUT1 immunoreactivity (ir) in the magnocellular CN ipsilateral to the cochlear damage was significantly decreased, while VGLUT2-ir in regions that receive non-auditory input was significantly increased two weeks after deafening. The pathway-specific amplification of VGLUT2 expression in the CN suggests that, in compensatory response to deafening, the non-auditory influence on CN is significantly enhanced. One undesirable consequence of enhanced glutamatergic inputs could be the increased spontaneous rates in CN neurons that occur after hearing loss, and that have been proposed as correlates of the phantom auditory sensations commonly called tinnitus.

In addition to input from auditory centers, the cochlear nucleus (CN) receives inputs from nonauditory centers, including the trigeminal sensory complex. The detailed anatomy, however, and the functional implications of the nonauditory innervation of the auditory system are not fully understood. We demonstrated previously that the trigeminal ganglion projects to CN, with terminal labeling most dense in the marginal cell area and secondarily in the magnocellular area of the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN). We continue this line of study by investigating the projection from the spinal trigeminal nucleus to CN in guinea pig. After injections of the retrograde tracers FluoroGold or biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) in VCN, labeled cells were found in the spinal trigeminal nuclei, most densely in the pars interpolaris and pars caudalis with ipsilateral dominance. The anterograde tracers Fluoro-Ruby or BDA were stereotaxically injected into the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Most labeled puncta were found in the marginal area of VCN and the fusiform cell layer of dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). A smaller number of labeled puncta was located in the molecular and deep layers of DCN and the magnocellular area of VCN. The trigeminal projection to CN may provide somatosensory information necessary for pursuing a sound source or for vocal production. These projections may have a role in the generation and modulation of tinnitus.

Somatic tinnitus is clinically observed modulation of the pitch and loudness of tinnitus by somatic stimulation. This phenomenon and the association of tinnitus with somatic neural disorders indicate that neural connections between the somatosensory and auditory systems may play a role in tinnitus. Anatomical and physiological evidence supports these observations. The trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia relay afferent somatosensory information from the periphery to secondary sensory neurons in the brainstem, specifically, the spinal trigeminal nucleus and dorsal column nuclei, respectively. Each of these structures has been shown to send excitatory projections to the cochlear nucleus. Mossy fibers from the spinal trigeminal and dorsal column nuclei terminate in the granule cell domain while en passant boutons from the ganglia terminate in the granule cell domain and core region of the cochlear nucleus. Sources of these somatosensory-auditory projections are associated with proprioceptive and cutaneous, but not nociceptive, sensation. Single unit and evoked potential recordings in the dorsal cochlear nucleus indicate that these pathways are physiologically active. Stimulation of the dorsal column and the cervical dorsal root ganglia elicits short- and long-latency inhibition separated by a transient excitatory peak in DCN single units. Similarly, activation of the trigeminal ganglion elicits excitation in some DCN units and inhibition in others. Bimodal integration in the DCN is demonstrated by comparing responses to somatosensory and auditory stimulation alone with responses to paired somatosensory and auditory stimulation. The modulation of firing rate and synchrony in DCN neurons by somatatosensory input is physiological correlate of somatic tinnitus.

No abstract