Autophagy is a dynamic cellular pathway involved in the turnover of proteins, protein complexes, and organelles through lysosomal degradation. The integrity of postmitotic neurons is heavily dependent on high basal autophagy compared to non-neuronal cells as misfolded proteins and damaged organelles cannot be diluted through cell division. Moreover, neurons contain the specialized structures for intercellular communication, such as axons, dendrites and synapses, which require the reciprocal transport of proteins, organelles and autophagosomes over significant distances from the soma. Defects in autophagy affect the intercellular communication and subsequently, contributing to neurodegeneration. The presence of abnormal autophagic activity is frequently observed in selective neuronal populations afflicted in common neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. These observations have provoked controversy regarding whether the increase in autophagosomes observed in the degenerating neurons play a protective role or instead contribute to pathogenic neuronal cell death. It is still unknown what factors may determine whether active autophagy is beneficial or pathogenic during neurodegeneration. In this review, we consider both the normal and pathophysiological roles of neuronal autophagy and its potential therapeutic implications for common neurodegenerative diseases.
Objectives This study aimed to develop a dual-input convolutional neural network (CNN)–based deep-learning algorithm that utilizes both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral elbow radiographs for the automated detection of pediatric supracondylar fracture in conventional radiography, and assess its feasibility and diagnostic performance. Materials and Methods To develop the deep-learning model, 1266 pairs of AP and lateral elbow radiographs examined between January 2013 and December 2017 at a single institution were split into a training set (1012 pairs, 79.9%) and a validation set (254 pairs, 20.1%). We performed external tests using 2 types of distinct datasets: one temporally and the other geographically separated from the model development. We used 258 pairs of radiographs examined in 2018 at the same institution as a temporal test set and 95 examined between January 2016 and December 2018 at another hospital as a geographic test set. Images underwent preprocessing, including cropping and histogram equalization, and were input into a dual-input neural network constructed by merging 2 ResNet models. An observer study was performed by radiologists on the geographic test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the model and human readers were calculated and compared. Results Our trained model showed an AUC of 0.976 in the validation set, 0.985 in the temporal test set, and 0.992 in the geographic test set. In AUC comparison, the model showed comparable results to the human readers in the geographic test set; the AUCs of human readers were in the range of 0.977 to 0.997 (P's > 0.05). The model had a sensitivity of 93.9%, a specificity of 92.2%, a PPV of 80.5%, and an NPV of 97.8% in the temporal test set, and a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 86.1%, a PPV of 69.7%, and an NPV of 100% in the geographic test set. Compared with the developed deep-learning model, all 3 human readers showed a significant difference (P's < 0.05) using the McNemar test, with lower specificity and PPV in the model. On the other hand, there was no significant difference (P's > 0.05) in sensitivity and NPV between all 3 human readers and the proposed model. Conclusions The proposed dual-input deep-learning model that interprets both AP and lateral elbow radiographs provided an accurate diagnosis of pediatric supracondylar fracture comparable to radiologists.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.