No abstract

Slow conduction perpendicular to the fiber direction in infarcted myocardial tissue is caused by a "zigzag" course of activation at high speed. Activation proceeds along pathways lengthened by branching and merging bundles of surviving myocytes ensheathed by collagenous septa.

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This study evaluated addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd in ASCT-eligible NDMM patients. Patients (N=207) were randomized 1:1 to receive RVd ±D induction (4 cycles), ASCT, RVd ±D consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide ±D maintenance (26 cycles). At the primary endpoint analysis, the stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation favored D-RVd over RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P=0.068) and met the prespecified 1-sided alpha of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses continued to deepen; rates of sCR improved for D-RVd versus RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P=0.0177), as did rates of minimal residual disease negativity (10−5 threshold) in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P<0.0001). Four (3.8%) and 7 (6.8%) patients in the D-RVd and RVd groups progressed, respectively, and 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% (D-RVd) and 89.8% (RVd). Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but rates of grade 3/4 infections were similar. Median CD34+ cell yield was 8.2´106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4´106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common in the D-RVd arm. There was no difference in median times to neutrophil or platelet engraftment. In summary, daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02874742.

PURPOSE Ibrutinib has shown activity in non–germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This double-blind phase III study evaluated ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in untreated non–germinal center B-cell DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to ibrutinib (560 mg per day orally) plus R-CHOP or placebo plus R-CHOP. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL subgroup. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS A total of 838 patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib plus R-CHOP (n = 419) or placebo plus R-CHOP (n = 419). Median age was 62.0 years; 75.9% of evaluable patients had ABC subtype disease, and baseline characteristics were balanced. Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP did not improve EFS in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.934) or ABC (HR, 0.949) population. A preplanned analysis showed a significant interaction between treatment and age. In patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS (HR, 0.579), PFS (HR, 0.556), and OS (HR, 0.330) and slightly increased serious adverse events (35.7% v 28.6%), but the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP was similar between treatment arms (92.9% v 93.0%). In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP worsened EFS, PFS, and OS, increased serious adverse events (63.4% v 38.2%), and decreased the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP (73.7% v 88.8%). CONCLUSION The study did not meet its primary end point in the ITT or ABC population. However, in patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS, PFS, and OS with manageable safety. In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP was associated with increased toxicity, leading to compromised R-CHOP administration and worse outcomes. Further investigation is warranted.

SummaryBackground Mantle-cell lymphoma is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Both ibrutinib and temsirolimus have shown single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. We undertook a phase 3 study to assess the effi cacy and safety of ibrutinib versus temsirolimus in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma.