GATA3 is a reliable diagnostic marker for NBs not only in scant/limited surgical specimens but also in cytologic samples, including air-dried touch imprints, which have previously been undescribed for this marker. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:940-6. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive plasmacytoma is a rare plasma cell neoplasm. It remains unclear whether EBV-positive plasmacytoma represents a distinct entity or a variant of plasmacytoma. It shares morphologic features with plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) and may cause diagnostic uncertainty. To better understand EBV-positive plasmacytoma and explore diagnostic criteria, this study describes 19 cases of EBV-positive plasmacytoma, compared with 27 cases of EBV-negative plasmacytoma and 48 cases of EBV-positive PBL. We reviewed the clinicopathologic findings and performed immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization for EBV, fluorescence in situ hybridization for MYC, and next-generation sequencing. We found that 63.2% of patients with EBV-positive plasmacytoma were immunocompromised. Anaplastic features were observed in 7/19 cases. MYC rearrangement was found in 25.0% of them, and extra copies of MYC in 81.3%. EBV-positive and EBV-negative plasmacytomas possessed similar clinicopathologic features, except more frequent cytologic atypia, bone involvement and MYC aberrations in the former group. The survival rate of patients with EBV-positive plasmacytoma was comparable to that of patients with EBV-negative plasmacytoma. In comparison to PBL, EBV-positive plasmacytoma is less commonly associated with a “starry-sky” appearance, necrosis, absence of light chain expression, and a high Ki67 index (>75%). The most recurrently mutated genes/signaling pathways in EBV-positive plasmacytoma are epigenetic regulators, MAPK pathway, and DNA damage response, while the most frequently reported mutations in PBL are not observed. Collectively, EBV-positive plasmacytoma should be regarded as a biological variant of plasmacytoma. Thorough morphologic examination remains the cornerstone for distinguishing EBV-positive plasmacytoma and PBL, and molecular studies can be a valuable complementary tool.
Primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoproliferative disorder (PCMZL) and primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (CD4+ TLPD) are indolent lymphoproliferative disorders. However, cases with overlapping features can be challenging. We identified 56 CD4+ TLPD and 38 PCMZL cases from our pathology archives. Clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic features were reviewed. Polymerase chain reaction for immunoglobulin (IG) and T-cell receptor gamma (TRG) gene rearrangements were analyzed. Next-generation sequencing studies were performed on 26 cases with adequate material, 19 with CD4+ TLPD, and 7 with PCMZL. CD4+ TLPD presented mostly (91%) as solitary lesions, located in the head and neck area (64%), while PCMZL occurred mostly in the upper extremity (47%) and trunk (34%). Lesions were sometimes multiple (40%) and recurrences (67%) were more common. Cases of PCMZL had an increase in reactive CD3+ T cells, with frequent programmed cell death protein 1 expression, whereas cases of CD4+ TLPD often contained abundant reactive B cells. Twenty-five cases were identified as having overlapping features: 6 cases of PCMZL were clonal for both IG and TRG; 11 cases of CD4+ TLPD were clonal for IG and TRG and 6 cases of CD4+ TLPD had light chain–restricted plasma cells. By next-generation sequencing, 23 variants were detected in 15 genes, with PCMZL more likely to show alterations, most commonly affecting TNFAIP3 and FAS, altered in 5 cases. Both entities have an indolent clinical course with response to conservative therapy and management, and warrant interpretation as a lymphoproliferative disorder rather than overt lymphoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.