SUMMARY Sonic hedgehog (Shh), a soluble ligand overexpres sed by neoplastic cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), drives formation of a fibroblast-rich desmoplastic stroma. To better understand its role in malignant progression, we deleted Shh in a well-defined mouse model of PDAC. As predicted, Shh-deficient tumors had reduced stromal content. Surprisingly, such tumors were more aggressive and exhibited undifferentiated histology, increased vascularity, and heightened proliferation – features that were fully recapitulated in control mice treated with a Smoothened inhibitor. Furthermore, administration of VEGFR blocking antibody selectively improved survival of Shh-deficient tumors, indicating that Hedgehog-driven stroma suppresses tumor growth in part by restraining tumor angiogenesis. Together, these data demonstrate that some components of the tumor stroma can act to restrain tumor growth.
Bone marrow endothelial cells (ECs) are essential for reconstitution of hematopoiesis, but their role in self-renewal of long term-hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs) is unknown. We have developed angiogenic models to demonstrate that EC-derived angiocrine growth factors support in vitro self-renewal and in vivo repopulation of authentic LT-HSCs. In serum/cytokine-free co-cultures, ECs through direct cellular contact, stimulated incremental expansion of repopulating CD34−Flt3−cKit+Lineage−Sca1+ LT-HSCs, which retained their self-renewal ability, as determined by single cell and serial transplantation assays. Angiocrine expression of Notch-ligands by ECs promoted proliferation and prevented exhaustion of LT-HSCs derived from wild-type, but not Notch1/Notch2 deficient mice. In transgenic notch-reporter (TNR.Gfp) mice, regenerating TNR.Gfp+ LT-HSCs were detected in cellular contact with sinusoidal ECs and interfering with angiocrine, but not perfusion function, of SECs impaired repopulation of TNR.Gfp+ LT-HSCs. ECs establish an instructive vascular niche for clinical scale expansion of LT-HSCs and a cellular platform to identify stem cell-active trophogens.
Summary Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) arises from Barrett esophagus (BE), intestinal-like columnar metaplasia linked to reflux esophagitis. In a transgenic mouse model of BE, esophageal overexpression of interleukin-1β phenocopies human pathology with evolution of esophagitis, Barrett’s-like metaplasia and EAC. Histopathology and gene signatures resembled closely human BE, with upregulation of TFF2, Bmp4, Cdx2, Notch1 and IL-6. The development of BE and EAC was accelerated by exposure to bile acids and/or nitrosamines, and inhibited by IL-6 deficiency. Lgr5+ gastric cardia stem cells present in BE were able to lineage trace the early BE lesion. Our data suggest that BE and EAC arise from gastric progenitors due to a tumor-promoting IL-1β-IL-6 signaling cascade and Dll1-dependent Notch signaling.
Notch signaling promotes commitment of keratinocytes to differentiation and suppresses tumorigenesis. p63, a p53 family member, has been implicated in establishment of the keratinocyte cell fate and/or maintenance of epithelial self-renewal. Here we show that p63 expression is suppressed by Notch1 activation in both mouse and human keratinocytes through a mechanism independent of cell cycle withdrawal and requiring down-modulation of selected interferon-responsive genes, including IRF7 and/or IRF3. In turn, elevated p63 expression counteracts the ability of Notch1 to restrict growth and promote differentiation. p63 functions as a selective modulator of Notch1-dependent transcription and function, with the Hes-1 gene as one of its direct negative targets. Thus, a complex cross-talk between Notch and p63 is involved in the balance between keratinocyte self-renewal and differentiation. Normal tissue homeostasis is determined by a complex interplay between developmental signals and other cell regulatory pathways. Notch cell surface receptors and their ligands belonging to the Delta and Serrate/Jagged families play a crucial role in cell fate determination and differentiation, functioning in a cell-and context-specific manner (Artavanis-Tsakonas et al. 1999). In mammalian cells, Notch activation is generally thought to maintain stem cell potential and inhibit differentiation, thereby promoting carcinogenesis (Artavanis-Tsakonas et al. 1999). However, in specific cell types such as keratinocytes, increased Notch activity causes exit from the cell cycle and commitment to differentiation (Lowell et al. 2000;Rangarajan et al. 2001;Nickoloff et al. 2002), whereas down-modulation or loss of Notch1 function promotes carcinogenesis (Talora et al. 2002;Nicolas et al. 2003).In the human epidermis, localized expression of the Notch-ligand Delta in putative "stem cells" has been proposed to induce commitment of neighboring Notch1-expressing keratinocytes to a "transit-amplifying" phenotype, through a negative feedback mechanism of lateral inhibition (Lowell et al. 2000). On the other hand, in both mouse and human epidermis, Jagged 1/2, Notch1, and Notch2 are coexpressed in differentiating keratinocytes of the supra-basal layers, consistent with a positive feedback loop between these molecules that serves to reinforce and synchronize Notch activation with differentiation (Luo et al. 1997;Rangarajan et al. 2001;Nickoloff et al. 2002).The best characterized "canonical" pathway of Notch activation involves proteolytic cleavage and translocation of the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor to the nucleus, where it associates with the DNA-binding protein RBP-J (CBF-1, CSL), converting it from a repressor
The formation of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis, is a complex process that plays important roles in growth and development, tissue and organ regeneration, as well as numerous pathological conditions. Angiogenesis undergoes multiple discrete steps that can be individually evaluated and quantified by a large number of bioassays. These independent assessments hold advantages but also have limitations. This article describes in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro bioassays that are available for the evaluation of angiogenesis and highlights critical aspects that are relevant for their execution and proper interpretation. As such, this collaborative work is the first edition of consensus guidelines on angiogenesis bioassays to serve for current and future reference.
Inappropriate activation of the Wnt/b-catenin signaling has been implicated in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but exactly how b-catenin works remains to be elucidated. To identify, in vivo, the target genes of b-catenin in the liver, we have used the suppression subtractive hybridization technique and transgenic mice expressing an activated b-catenin in the liver that developed hepatomegaly. We identified three genes involved in glutamine metabolism, encoding glutamine synthetase (GS), ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) and the glutamate transporter GLT-1. By Northern blot and immunohistochemical analysis we demonstrated that these three genes were specifically induced by activation of the b-catenin pathway in the liver. In different mouse models bearing an activated bcatenin signaling in the liver known to be associated with hepatocellular proliferation we observed a marked upregulation of these three genes. The cellular distribution of GS and GLT-1 parallels b-catenin activity. By contrast no up-regulation of these three genes was observed in the liver in which hepatocyte proliferation was induced by a signal-independent of b-catenin. In addition, the GS promoter was activated in the liver of GS +/LacZ mice by adenovirus vector-mediated b-catenin overexpression. Strikingly, the overexpression of the GS gene in human HCC samples was strongly correlated with b-catenin activation. Together, our results indicate that GS is a target of the Wnt/b-catenin pathway in the liver. Because a linkage of the glutamine pathway to hepatocarcinogenesis has already been demonstrated, we propose that regulation of these three genes of glutamine metabolism by b-catenin is a contributing factor to liver carcinogenesis.
The Wnts are a family of glycoproteins that regulate cell proliferation, fate decisions, and differentiation. In our study, we examined the contribution of Wnts to the development of ventral midbrain (VM) dopaminergic (DA) neurons. Our results show that -catenin is expressed in DA precursor cells and that -catenin signaling takes place in these cells, as assessed in TOPGAL [Tcf optimal-promoter -galactosidase] reporter mice. We also found that Wnt-1, -3a, and -5a expression is differentially regulated during development and that partially purified Wnts distinctively regulate VM development. Wnt-3a promoted the proliferation of precursor cells expressing the orphan nuclear receptor-related factor 1 (Nurr1) but did not increase the number of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive neurons. Instead, Wnt-1 and -5a increased the number of rat midbrain DA neurons in rat embryonic day 14.5 precursor cultures by two distinct mechanisms. Wnt-1 predominantly increased the proliferation of Nurr1؉ precursors, up-regulated cyclins D1 and D3, and down-regulated p27 and p57 mRNAs. In contrast, Wnt-5a primarily increased the proportion of Nurr1؉ precursors that acquired a neuronal DA phenotype and up-regulated the expression of Ptx3 and c-ret mRNA. Moreover, the soluble cysteine-rich domain of Frizzled-8 (a Wnt inhibitor) blocked endogenous Wnts and the effects of Wnt-1 and -5a on proliferation and the acquisition of a DA phenotype in precursor cultures. These findings indicate that Wnts are key regulators of proliferation and differentiation of DA precursors during VM neurogenesis and that different Wnts have specific and unique activity profiles.T he development of midbrain dopaminergic (DA) neurons requires a complex combination of transcriptional regulators and diffusible signals to control both the acquisition and maintenance of a neurotransmitter-specific phenotype. The orphan nuclear receptor-related factor 1 (Nurr1, also known as NR4A2) is the only factor known to be required by midbrain precursor cells for the acquisition of a midbrain DA phenotype (1-4). Null mutations in other transcriptional regulators expressed in DA neurons, such as the homeodomain proteins Lmx1b and Ptx3, result in the loss of midbrain DA neurons after their birth (5-7). With regard to soluble diffusible signals, intersections of Shh (ventrally) and FGF8 (in the isthmus) create sites for the induction of DA neurons (8). Members of the Wnt family of secreted glycoproteins are also expressed in the midbrain (9) and are known to regulate precursor proliferation (10-12), fate decisions (13-17), and neuronal differentiation (18)(19)(20) in the nervous system. Interestingly, deletion of Wnt-1 results in the loss of DA neurons (21) and of the entire midbrain-hindbrain junction (22,23). Another mutant mouse with a similar phenotype in the midbrain is the LRP6 (low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6) null (24), which lacks a receptor necessary for Wnt signaling. Combined, these findings suggest an important role for Wnts during the development of mid...
Emerging concepts suggest that macrophage functional phenotype is regulated by transcription factors that define alternative activation states. We found that RBP-J, the major nuclear transducer of Notch signaling, augmented TLR4-induced expression of key mediators of classically activated M1 macrophages and thus innate immune responses to L. monocytogenes. Notch-RBP-J signaling controlled expression of the transcription factor IRF8 that induced downstream M1-specific genes. RBP-J promoted IRF8 protein synthesis by selectively augmenting IRAK2-dependent TLR4 signaling to the MNK1 kinase and downstream translation initiation control through eIF4E. These results define a signaling network in which Notch-RBP-J and TLR signaling are integrated at the level of IRF8 protein synthesis and identify a mechanism by which heterologous signaling pathways can regulate TLR-induced inflammatory macrophage polarization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.