Background: Along with fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, core‐biopsy has become an integral part of the assessment of mammographically detected breast lesions.Methods: A series of stereotactic large‐core‐biopsies of mammographically detected breast lesions was studied to assess the accuracy and limitations of the technique in diagnosing malignancy and in giving specific benign diagnoses, and its use in determining surgical management.Results: Eighty per cent of carcinomas were diagnosed as malignant (absolute sensitivity). In 88.8% of the cancers, the core‐biopsy was classified as malignant, suspicious or atypical/indeterminate (complete sensitivity), and in 72% of the invasive carcinomas, invasive tumour was present in the core. The technique was more successful for invasive carcinomas than for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (absolute sensitivity 86.1 and 55.5, respectively; P= 0.28) and for malignant mass lesions than for a mass with associated microcalcifications or for pure microcalcifications (absolute sensitivity 91, 71 and 66.6%, respectively; P= 0.19). In five of the 45 cancers (11.1%), no tumour tissue was present in the core, but all were excised after mammographic review and no delays in diagnosis have been experienced to date. The benign to malignant ratio for excised lesions was 0.11:1. Of the benign lesions, a specific diagnosis was given in 49% (calcifications in the core in a background of fibrocystic change, or postoperative scarring, or fibro‐adenoma); the remainder showed non‐specific benign findings. All patients where invasive carcinoma was diagnosed in the core underwent axillary clearance and wide local excision or mastectomy at their first operation.Conclusions: This technique can markedly reduce the number of benign lesions needing open biopsy, and provide information allowing definitive management of most carcinomas at the first operation. The accuracy of core‐biopsy was lower in DCIS/ microcalcification lesions; extra core samples or a combination of FNA and core‐biopsy may be of value in these cases.

ObjectivesTo examine the effects of nurse-led interventions on the health-related quality of life, symptom burden and self-management/behavioural outcomes in women with breast cancer.MethodsCochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline and Embase databases were searched (January 1999 to May 2019) to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled before-and-after studies of interventions delivered by nurses with oncology experience for women with breast cancer. Risk of bias was evaluated using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. Intervention effects were synthesised by cancer trajectory using The Omaha System Intervention Classification Scheme.ResultsThirty-one RCTs (4651 participants) were included. All studies were at risk of bias mainly due to inherent limitations such as lack of blinding and self-report data. Most studies (71%; n=22) reported at least one superior intervention effect. There were no differences in all outcomes between those who receive nurse-led surveillance care versus those who received physical led or usual discharge care. Compared with control interventions, there were superior teaching, guidance and counselling (63%) and case management (100%) intervention effects on symptom burden during treatment and survivorship. Effects of these interventions on health-related quality of life and symptom self-management/behavioural outcomes were inconsistent.DiscussionThere is consistent evidence from RCTs that nurse-led surveillance interventions are as safe and effective as physician-led care and strong evidence that nurse-led teaching, guidance and counselling and case management interventions are effective for symptom management. Future studies should ensure the incorporation of health-related quality of life and self-management/behavioural outcomes and consider well-designed attentional placebo controls to blind participants for self-report outcomes.Protocol registrationThe International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42020134914).

Background:Though rehabilitation attempts to correct “stiff knee gait” and control for dynamic limb valgus after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), impaired biomechanics often persist when an individual is cleared to return to sport (RTS). Reduced knee extension moments (KEMs) and knee flexion angles (KFAs) often continue. While at the hip, increased hip adduction angles (HADDAs) and hip internal rotation angles (HIRAs) often persist in spite of dynamic hip stabilization exercises. Sled towing and weighted vest tasks increase KEM and hip extension moments (HEMs) in healthy individuals, yet biomechanical profiles during these tasks after ACLR are unknown.Hypothesis:Weighted gait will increase KEM, HEM, hip abduction moments (HABDMs), and hip external rotation moments (HERMs) and will not increase unwanted biomechanics (limb asymmetries, HIRA, HADDA) compared with normal gait.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Level of Evidence:Level 4.Methods:Fourteen men and 24 women who were 5 to 12 months after ACLR, had no concomitant ligament injuries, and were cleared to RTS were recruited. Sexes were evaluated independently given the sex-specific incidence to ACL injury, reinjury, and gait responses to certain interventions. Joint moment impulses and peak angles over the first 25% of stance were compared between limbs and across tasks (eg, unweighted gait, sled 50% body weight [BW], and vest 50% BW).Results:Men showed that weighted gait increased KEM, HEM, HERM, HADBM (vest only), HADDA, HIRA (sled only), and KFA. Asymmetrical KEM and KFA existed across tasks. Women showed that weighted gait increased KEM, HEM, HERM, HADBM (vest only), HFA (sled only), HADDA, and KFA. Asymmetrical KEM, HEM, HIRA, and KFA (sled only) existed across tasks.Conclusion:Weighted gait generally increased joint moments. Unwanted biomechanics were unique for each weighted gait task.Clinical Relevance:Though joint moments increased, both tasks created unwanted biomechanics after ACLR. Persistent hip (women only) and KEM asymmetries across tasks when cleared to RTS are concerning given the relationship among these biomechanics and decreased functional performance.

No abstract

No abstract