Intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone speeds the recovery of visual loss due to optic neuritis and results in slightly better vision at six months. Oral prednisone alone, as prescribed in this study, is an ineffective treatment and increases the risk of new episodes of optic neuritis.
We reviewed the efficacy of CSF diversion for pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) in patients from six different institutions. Thirty-seven patients underwent a total of 73 lumboperitoneal shunts and nine ventricular shunts. Only 14 patients remained "cured" after a single surgical procedure. The average time between shunt insertion and shunt replacement was 9 months, although 64% of shunts lasted less than 6 months. Shunt failure (55%) and low-pressure headaches (21%) were the most common causes for reoperation. The vision of most patients improved (13) or stabilized (13) postoperatively. However, three who had initially improved subsequently lost vision. Six had a postoperative decrease in vision. Two patients improved in one eye but worsened postoperatively in the other. Four lost vision despite apparently adequate shunt function. Shunt failure with relapse of PTC occurred as late as 7 years after insertion. CSF diversion procedures have a significant failure rate as well as a high frequency of side effects.
While skin tears are a common occurrence in the institutionalized elderly population, nothing has been written about this problem. We retrospectively studied all incident reports during a 1-year period at a large, urban, long-term-care facility to identify residents with skin tears. The overall incidence of skin tears was 0.92 per patient per year. The incidence rate for females, but not for males, increased significantly with age (P = 0.012). The mean length of the skin tear was 1.9 cm +/- 1.4 (mean +/- SD). Eighty percent occurred in the upper extremities, with the most frequent location being the forearm. Almost half of the skin tears reported had an unknown cause. Wheelchairs and accidentally bumping into an object each accounted for a quarter of the skin tears where the cause was known. Transfers and falls contributed to a lesser extent. Impaired mental status was no more likely to be present in residents experiencing a skin tear than in all nursing home residents. Twenty-four of the 147 residents with skin tears had four or more tears, accounting for 40% of all skin tears reported. Ninety-seven percent of the episodes resulted in no attending physicians' orders other than the standing orders. Future studies should be designed to determine if there are adverse consequences of skin tears and to suggest programs to reduce their occurrence.
Background Testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–specific antibodies has become an important tool, complementing nucleic acid tests (NATs) for diagnosis and for determining the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in population serosurveys. The magnitude and persistence of antibody responses are critical for assessing the duration of immunity. Methods A SARS-CoV-2-specific immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) assay for immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) was developed and prospectively evaluated by comparison to the reference standard of NAT on respiratory tract samples from individuals with suspected COVID-19. Neutralizing antibody responses were measured in a subset of samples using a standard microneutralization assay. Results A total of 2753 individuals were eligible for the study (126 NAT-positive; prevalence, 4.6%). The median “window period” from illness onset to appearance of antibodies (range) was 10.2 (5.8–14.4) days. The sensitivity and specificity of either SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, or IgM when collected ≥14 days after symptom onset were 91.3% (95% CI, 84.9%–95.6%) and 98.9% (95% CI, 98.4%–99.3%), respectively. The negative predictive value was 99.6% (95% CI, 99.3%–99.8%). The positive predictive value of detecting any antibody class was 79.9% (95% CI, 73.3%–85.1%); this increased to 96.8% (95% CI, 90.7%–99.0%) for the combination of IgG and IgA. Conclusions Measurement of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody by IFA is an accurate method to diagnose COVID-19. Serological testing should be incorporated into diagnostic algorithms for SARS-CoV-2 infection to identify additional cases where NAT was not performed and resolve cases where false-negative and false-positive NATs are suspected. The majority of individuals develop robust antibody responses following infection, but the duration of these responses and implications for immunity remain to be established.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.