Background: Characterizing reactive stepping is important to describe the response's effectiveness. Measures of reactive stepping related to step initiation, execution, and termination phases have been frequently reported to characterize reactive balance control. However, the testretest reliability of these measures are unknown. Research questions: What is the between-and within-session test-retest reliability of various force plate-derived measures of reactive stepping? Methods: Nineteen young, healthy adults responded to 6 small (~8-10% of body weight) and 6 large perturbations (~13-15% of body weight) using an anterior lean-and-release system. Tests were conducted on two visits separated by at least two days. Participants were instructed to recover balance in as few steps as possible.Step onset, foot-off, swing, and restabilization times were extracted from force plates. Relative test-retest reliability was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Absolute test-retest reliability was assessed using the standard error of the measurement (SEM). Results: Foot-off and swing times had the highest between-and within-session test-retest reliabilities regardless of perturbation size (between-session ICC=0.898-0.942; within-session ICC=0.455-0.753). Conversely, step onset and restabilization time had lower ICCs and wider CIs (between-session ICC=0.495-0.825; within-session ICC=-0.040-0.174). Between-session testretest reliability was higher (ICC=0.495-0.942) for all measures than within-session test-retest reliability (ICC=-0.040-0.753). SEMs were low (3-10% of mean) for all measures, except time to restabilization (SEM=15-20% of mean), indicating good absolute reliability. Significance: These findings suggest multiple baseline sessions are needed for measuring restabilization and step onset times. The SEMs provide an index for measuring meaningful change due to an intervention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.