Summary Background Microbiological confirmation of childhood tuberculosis is rare because of the difficulty of collection of specimens, low sensitivity of smear microscopy, and poor access to culture. We aimed to establish summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity of of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay compared with microscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children. Methods We searched for studies published up to Jan 6, 2015, that used Xpert in any setting in children with and without HIV infection. We systematically reviewed studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) with microscopy for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in children younger than 16 years against two reference standards—culture results and culture-negative children who were started on anti-tuberculosis therapy. We did meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model. Findings We identified 15 studies including 4768 respiratory specimens in 3640 children investigated for pulmonary tuberculosis. Culture tests were positive for tuberculosis in 12% (420 of 3640) of all children assessed and Xpert was positive in 11% (406 of 3640). Compared with culture, the pooled sensitivities and specificities of Xpert for tuberculosis detection were 62% (95% credible interval 51–73) and 98% (97–99), respectively, with use of expectorated or induced sputum samples and 66% (51–81) and 98% (96–99), respectively, with use of samples from gastric lavage. Xpert sensitivity was 36–44% higher than was sensitivity for microscopy. Xpert sensitivity in culture-negative children started on antituberculosis therapy was 2% (1–3) for expectorated or induced sputum. Xpert’s pooled sensitivity and specificity to detect rifampicin resistance was 86% (95% credible interval 53–98) and 98% (94–100), respectively. Interpretation Compared with microscopy, Xpert offers better sensitivity for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children and its scale-up will improve access to tuberculosis diagnostics for children. Although Xpert helps to provide rapid confirmation of disease, its sensitivity remains suboptimum compared with culture tests. A negative Xpert result does not rule out tuberculosis. Good clinical acumen is still needed to decide when to start antituberculosis therapy and continued research for better diagnostics is crucial. Funding WHO, Global TB Program of Texas Children’s Hospital.
Rotator cuff (RTC) repair outcomes are unsatisfactory due to the poor healing capacity of the tendon bone interface (TBI). In our preceding study, tendon hydrogel (tHG), which is a type I collagen rich gel derived from human tendons, improved biomechanical properties of the TBI in a rat chronic RTC injury model. Here we investigated whether adipose‐derived stem cell (ASC)‐seeded tHG injection at the repair site would further improve RTC healing. Rats underwent bilateral supraspinatus tendon detachment. Eight weeks later injured supraspinatus tendons were repaired with one of four treatments. In the control group, standard transosseous suture repair was performed. In the ASC, tHG, tHGASC groups, ASC in media, tHG, and ASC‐seeded tHG were injected at repair site after transosseous suture repair, respectively. Eight weeks after repair, the TBI was evaluated biomechanically, histologically, and via micro CT. Implanted ASCs were detected in ASC and tHGASC groups 7 weeks after implantation. ACS implantation improved bone morphometry at the supraspinatus insertion on the humerus. Injection of tHG improved biomechanical properties of the repaired TBI. RTC healing in tHGASC group was significantly better than control but statistically equivalent to the tHG group based on biomechanical properties, fibrocartilage area at the TBI, and bone morphometry at the supraspinatus insertion. In a rat RTC chronic injury model, no biomechanical advantage was gained with ASC augmentation of tHG. Clinical Significance: Tendon hydrogel augmentation with adipose derived stem cells does not significantly improve TBI healing over tHG alone in a chronic rotator cuff injury model. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.