Background: Onychomycosis and dermatomycoses can result in serious complications in patients with underlying chronic diseases such as diabetes. To avoid these complications, these dermatological disorders need to be treated efficiently, for example with the triazole antifungal itraconazole. Itraconazole can inhibit the metabolism of drugs by CYP 3A4 and therefore might affect the efficacy of antidiabetic agents. Objective: To investigate this, we assessed the safety of itraconazole in diabetic patients with onychomycosis or dermatomycoses. Methods: We reviewed pharmacokinetic and safety data from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance over the past 10 years. Results: Postmarketing surveillance (a review of all adverse-event reports in patients receiving itraconazole concomitantly with insulin or an oral antidiabetic agent) revealed 15 reports suggestive of hyperglycemia and 9 reports suggestive of hypoglycemia; in most patients, no change in antidiabetic effect was reported. From clinical trials including a total of 189 diabetic patients treated with itraconazole for various infections (mainly systemic infections and vaginal candidiasis), only one itraconazole-related adverse event was recorded; this was a case of aggravated diabetes in a renal transplant recipient who was also receiving cyclosporine. Adverse effects due to drug-drug interactions are not expected in diabetic patients receiving oral antidiabetic agents that are not metabolized through the CYP 3A4 system (e.g. tolbutamide, gliclazide, glibenclamide, glipizide and metformin). Conclusion: Itraconazole can be used safely and efficiently for the treatment of dermatological disorders in diabetic patients.
A comparative post-marketing surveillance study of the safety and efficacy of flunarizine and propranolol in the treatment of migraine was carried out. General practitioners in Belgium and the Netherlands each recruited patients for whom they would prescribe one of the study medications in the normal course of their treatment and recorded all medical events on follow-up forms for up to 8 months. A total of 1601 migraine patients were enrolled; 838 in the flunarizine cohort and 763 in the propranolol cohort. Propranolol was somewhat better than flunarizine in reducing the severity of migraine attacks, although this may have been due to a selection bias. Discontinuations of therapy due to events considered likely to be treatment-related were mostly due to the recognized side effects of the two drugs. As regards the occurrence of depressions, a total of 58 patients had depressive events, 34 in the flunarizine cohort and 24 in the propranolol cohort. Whereas migraine itself appears to be associated with an increased risk of depression, the number of previous migraine treatments was shown to be an additional risk factor for the development of depression in patients receiving flunarizine as was a history of depression. Overall, there was no appreciable difference in the risk/benefit ratio between flunarizine and propranolol.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.