Neonatal deaths comprise a growing proportion of global under-five mortality. However, data from the highest-burden areas is sparse. This descriptive retrospective study analyses the outcomes of all infants exiting the Médecins sans Frontières-managed neonatal unit in Aweil Hospital, rural South Sudan from 2011 to 2014. A total of 4268 patients were treated over 4 years, with annual admissions increasing from 687 to 1494. Overall mortality was 13.5% (n = 576), declining from 18.7% to 11.1% (p for trend <0.001). Newborns weighing <2500 g were at significantly increased mortality risk compared with babies ≥2500 g (odds ratio = 2.27, 95% confidence interval = 1.9–2.71, p < 0.001). Leading causes of death included sepsis (49.7%), tetanus (15.8%), respiratory distress (12.8%) and asphyxia (9.2%). Tetanus had the highest case fatality rate (49.7%), followed by perinatal asphyxia (26.5%), respiratory distress (20.4%) and neonatal sepsis (10.5%). Despite increasing admissions, overall mortality declined, indicating that survival of these especially vulnerable infants can be improved even in a basic-level district hospital programme.
A pilot economic evaluation of a projected pressure ulcer prevention policy was carried out in a 252-bed geriatric unit in Glasgow. The aim was to set up a framework for evaluating and comparing the costs and benefits of current care and a potential prevention programme. Data were collated from prevalence and incidence studies. Prevalence results showed that 41% of the patient population suffered pressure damage to some extent and incidence data showed that 45% of these were potentially preventable. Evaluation of the costs and benefits shows that the prevention programme would be cost-effective. The cost would be between 17,606 Pounds and 28,669 Pounds but the benefits would range from 305,506 Pounds to 342,510 Pounds. The authors conclude that economic appraisal is feasible.
patients (81.5%) and adenocarcinoma in 5 (18.5%). The rates of metastasis-directed therapy after recurrence were 23.1% and 71.4% in Groups A and B, respectively. In Group A, radical hysterectomy was performed in 1 patient; lymphadenectomy for para-aortic region in 4; neck dissection in 1; and radiotherapy for the para-aortic region in 4, supraclavicular region in 3, axillary region in 1, and mediastinum region in 3. In Group B, radical hysterectomy was performed in 1 patient, pulmonary resection in 1, and radiotherapy for the para-aortic region in 1. The total dose of radiotherapy was determined by the site of recurrence (39.6e60 Gy). The 2-year overall survival rates after the first recurrence (OSr) were 82.5% and 31.2% for Groups A and B, respectively (p Z 0.001). The 2-year OSr for patients who underwent salvage local therapy was 74.1%, whereas that for patients who did not was 41.6% (p Z 0.03). Grade 3 toxicity related to salvage local therapy was observed in 1 patient. Conclusion: Patients with extrapelvic lymph node recurrence alone had favorable prognoses. Metastasis-directed therapy may contribute to such long-term survival with acceptable toxicities.
Purpose/Objective(s): Various adjuvant approaches are utilized in the management of endometrial cancer based on surgical pathology and institutional preference. The radiosensitivity index (RSI) is a previously validated multi-gene expression index that estimates tumor radiosensitivity. In this study, we evaluate RSI as a genomic predictor for pelvic failure (PF) in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. Materials/Methods: A total of 204 consecutively treated patients with endometrial cancer were identified from our IRB-approved institutional tissue biorepository. All patients underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with the majority undergoing lymph node dissection (nZ181; 88%) between 01/99 and 04/11 and followed until 01/ 19. Gene expression was from Affymetrix Hu-RSTA-2a520709 (Affymetrix; Santa Clara, CA). The RSI 10-gene signature was calculated for each sample using the previously published algorithm. Radiophenotype was determined by dichotomization of RSI at the previously identified cutpoint of 0.375; 0.375 Z radioresistant (RR) and <0.375 Z radiosensitive (RS). Time to event analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test. Associations between radiophenotype and outcomes were explored with univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression. The threshold for statistical significance in all tests was set at p<0.05. Results: Median follow-up was 38.5 months (range: 0.2-216). The median RSI was 0.42 (range: 0.11-0.70). There were no significant differences in RS and RR patients in age (pZ0.99), serosa and/or adnexa involvement (pZ0.37), vaginal and/or parametrial involvement (pZ0.48), cervical stromal invasion (pZ0.59), receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (pZ0.12), and node involvement (pZ0.78). A total of 83 (41%) patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy with vaginal brachytherapy (nZ19; 23%), pelvic radiotherapy (nZ26; 31%), or both (nZ38; 46%). In patients treated with radiation, RR patients were more likely to undergo PF (3 year pelvic control 84% vs 100%; pZ0.02) with worse PF free survival (PFFS) (3 year PFFS 65% vs. 89%; pZ0.04). However, since RSI is a radiation specific signature it did not predict PF (pZ0.86) or PFFS (pZ0.57) in patients not treated with radiation. Factors found to predict PF on UVA included grade 3/1-2 (HR 3.8; 95% CI 1.2-14.8, pZ0.03), serosa and/or adnexa involvement (5.9; 95% CI 1.6-20.2, pZ0.008), lymph node involvement (4.9; 95% CI 1.5-18.8, 0.009), and RR/RS (7.7; 95% CI 1.5-140.9, 0.01). On MVA, factors that continued to predict for PF included RR/RS (10.7; 95% CI 1.9-202.4, pZ0.004), lymph node involvement (4.1; 95% CI 1.2-16.3, pZ0.03), and serosa and/or adnexa involvement (4.3; 95% CI 1.2-16.4, pZ0.03). Conclusion: RSI was found to be a significant predictor of PF in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy on MVA. We propose RSI may be a method to predict which patients are most likely to fail in the pelvis and candidates for treatment escalation in the adjuvant setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.