Reconstructing the origin and evolution of land plants and their algal relatives is a fundamental problem in plant phylogenetics, and is essential for understanding how critical adaptations arose, including the embryo, vascular tissue, seeds, and flowers. Despite advances in molecular systematics, some hypotheses of relationships remain weakly resolved. Inferring deep phylogenies with bouts of rapid diversification can be problematic; however, genome-scale data should significantly increase the number of informative characters for analyses. Recent phylogenomic reconstructions focused on the major divergences of plants have resulted in promising but inconsistent results. One limitation is sparse taxon sampling, likely resulting from the difficulty and cost of data generation. To address this limitation, transcriptome data for 92 streptophyte taxa were generated and analyzed along with 11 published plant genome sequences. Phylogenetic reconstructions were conducted using up to 852 nuclear genes and 1,701,170 aligned sites. Sixty-nine analyses were performed to test the robustness of phylogenetic inferences to permutations of the data matrix or to phylogenetic method, including supermatrix, supertree, and coalescent-based approaches, maximumlikelihood and Bayesian methods, partitioned and unpartitioned analyses, and amino acid versus DNA alignments. Among other results, we find robust support for a sister-group relationship between land plants and one group of streptophyte green algae, the Zygnematophyceae. Strong and robust support for a clade comprising liverworts and mosses is inconsistent with a widely accepted view of early land plant evolution, and suggests that phylogenetic hypotheses used to understand the evolution of fundamental plant traits should be reevaluated.land plants | Streptophyta | phylogeny | phylogenomics | transcriptome T he origin of embryophytes (land plants) in the Ordovician period roughly 480 Mya (1-4) marks one of the most important events in the evolution of life on Earth. The early evolution of embryophytes in terrestrial environments was facilitated by numerous innovations, including parental protection for the developing embryo, sperm and egg production in multicellular protective structures, and an alternation of phases (often referred to as generations) in which a diploid sporophytic life history stage gives rise to a multicellular haploid gametophytic phase. With Significance Early branching events in the diversification of land plants and closely related algal lineages remain fundamental and unresolved questions in plant evolutionary biology. Accurate reconstructions of these relationships are critical for testing hypotheses of character evolution: for example, the origins of the embryo, vascular tissue, seeds, and flowers. We investigated relationships among streptophyte algae and land plants using the largest set of nuclear genes that has been applied to this problem to date. Hypothesized relationships were rigorously tested through a series of analyses to assess systematic er...

Although Pentapetalae (comprising all core eudicots except Gunnerales) include ≈70% of all angiosperms, the origin of and relationships among the major lineages of this clade have remained largely unresolved. Phylogenetic analyses of 83 protein-coding and rRNA genes from the plastid genome for 86 species of seed plants, including new sequences from 25 eudicots, indicate that soon after its origin, Pentapetalae diverged into three clades: (i) a "superrosid" clade consisting of Rosidae, Vitaceae, and Saxifragales; (ii) a "superasterid" clade consisting of Berberidopsidales, Santalales, Caryophyllales, and Asteridae; and (iii) Dilleniaceae. Maximum-likelihood analyses support the position of Dilleniaceae as sister to superrosids, but topology tests did not reject alternative positions of Dilleniaceae as sister to Asteridae or all remaining Pentapetalae. Molecular dating analyses suggest that the major lineages within both superrosids and superasterids arose in as little as 5 million years. This phylogenetic hypothesis provides a crucial historical framework for future studies aimed at elucidating the underlying causes of the morphological and species diversity in Pentapetalae.Angiosperm Tree of Life | Pentapetalae | plastid genome T he Eudicotyledoneae (sensu) (1), or eudicots, comprise ≈75% of all angiosperm species (2) and encompass enormous morphological, biochemical, and ecological diversity. More than 90% of eudicot species diversity is found within the clade Pentapetalae (1), which includes major clades such as Rosidae, Caryophyllales, Saxifragales, Asteridae, and Santalales, as well as smaller lineages such as Berberidopsidales and Dilleniaceae (3-8). Previous analyses of multigene data sets have failed to resolve relationships among the major clades of Pentapetalae (6, 9). The inability to resolve these relationships suggests that the major lineages of Pentapetalae diverged rapidly, a hypothesis supported by the fossil record (10, 11). However, our understanding of the origins and evolution of Pentapetalae diversity, and consequently much of angiosperm diversity, is hindered by the lack of a well-supported phylogenetic hypothesis.Phylogenetic analyses based on complete plastid genome sequences have resolved several enigmatic relationships within angiosperms (12, 13). However, these analyses have not included data for many crucial eudicot clades. To resolve relationships among the major clades of Eudicotyledoneae (with a focus on Pentapetalae), we performed phylogenetic analyses using a data set composed of 83 genes derived from 86 complete plastid genome sequences, 25 of which were eudicot sequences generated for this study. To date, this is the largest plastid genome data set used for phylogenetic inference and includes representatives of nearly all (37 of 42) orders of eudicots sensu Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) III (14). The resulting phylogenetic hypothesis helps to clarify the diversification of Pentapetalae and provides an improved framework for investigating evolutionary processes that accompanie...

Reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships that unite all lineages (the tree of life) is a grand challenge. The paucity of homologous character data across disparately related lineages currently renders direct phylogenetic inference untenable. To reconstruct a comprehensive tree of life, we therefore synthesized published phylogenies, together with taxonomic classifications for taxa never incorporated into a phylogeny. We present a draft tree containing 2.3 million tipsthe Open Tree of Life. Realization of this tree required the assembly of two additional community resources: (i) a comprehensive global reference taxonomy and (ii) a database of published phylogenetic trees mapped to this taxonomy. Our open source framework facilitates community comment and contribution, enabling the tree to be continuously updated when new phylogenetic and taxonomic data become digitally available. Although data coverage and phylogenetic conflict across the Open Tree of Life illuminate gaps in both the underlying data available for phylogenetic reconstruction and the publication of trees as digital objects, the tree provides a compelling starting point for community contribution. This comprehensive tree will fuel fundamental research on the nature of biological diversity, ultimately providing up-to-date phylogenies for downstream applications in comparative biology, ecology, conservation biology, climate change, agriculture, and genomics.phylogeny | taxonomy | tree of life | biodiversity | synthesis T he realization that all organisms on Earth are related by common descent (1) was one of the most profound insights in scientific history. The goal of reconstructing the tree of life is one of the most daunting challenges in biology. The scope of the problem is immense: there are ∼1.8 million named species, and most species have yet to be described (2-4). Despite decades of effort and thousands of phylogenetic studies on diverse clades, we lack a comprehensive tree of life, or even a summary of our current knowledge. One reason for this shortcoming is lack of data. GenBank contains DNA sequences for ∼411,000 species, only 22% of estimated named species. Although some gene regions (e.g., rbcL, 16S, COI) have been widely sequenced across some lineages, they are insufficient for resolving relationships across the entire tree (5). Most recognized species have never been included in a phylogenetic analysis because no appropriate molecular or morphological data have been collected.There is extensive publication of new phylogenies, data, and inference methods, but little attention to synthesis. We therefore focus on constructing, to our knowledge, the first comprehensive tree of life through the integration of published phylogenies with taxonomic information. Phylogenies by systematists with expertise in particular taxa likely represent the best estimates of relationships for individual clades. By focusing on trees instead of raw data, we avoid issues of dataset assembly (6). However, most published phylogenies are available only as jour...

BackgroundNext-generation sequencing has provided a wealth of plastid genome sequence data from an increasingly diverse set of green plants (Viridiplantae). Although these data have helped resolve the phylogeny of numerous clades (e.g., green algae, angiosperms, and gymnosperms), their utility for inferring relationships across all green plants is uncertain. Viridiplantae originated 700-1500 million years ago and may comprise as many as 500,000 species. This clade represents a major source of photosynthetic carbon and contains an immense diversity of life forms, including some of the smallest and largest eukaryotes. Here we explore the limits and challenges of inferring a comprehensive green plant phylogeny from available complete or nearly complete plastid genome sequence data.ResultsWe assembled protein-coding sequence data for 78 genes from 360 diverse green plant taxa with complete or nearly complete plastid genome sequences available from GenBank. Phylogenetic analyses of the plastid data recovered well-supported backbone relationships and strong support for relationships that were not observed in previous analyses of major subclades within Viridiplantae. However, there also is evidence of systematic error in some analyses. In several instances we obtained strongly supported but conflicting topologies from analyses of nucleotides versus amino acid characters, and the considerable variation in GC content among lineages and within single genomes affected the phylogenetic placement of several taxa.ConclusionsAnalyses of the plastid sequence data recovered a strongly supported framework of relationships for green plants. This framework includes: i) the placement of Zygnematophyceace as sister to land plants (Embryophyta), ii) a clade of extant gymnosperms (Acrogymnospermae) with cycads + Ginkgo sister to remaining extant gymnosperms and with gnetophytes (Gnetophyta) sister to non-Pinaceae conifers (Gnecup trees), and iii) within the monilophyte clade (Monilophyta), Equisetales + Psilotales are sister to Marattiales + leptosporangiate ferns. Our analyses also highlight the challenges of using plastid genome sequences in deep-level phylogenomic analyses, and we provide suggestions for future analyses that will likely incorporate plastid genome sequence data for thousands of species. We particularly emphasize the importance of exploring the effects of different partitioning and character coding strategies.

The 1,000 plants (1KP) project is an international multi-disciplinary consortium that has generated transcriptome data from over 1,000 plant species, with exemplars for all of the major lineages across the Viridiplantae (green plants) clade. Here, we describe how to access the data used in a phylogenomics analysis of the first 85 species, and how to visualize our gene and species trees. Users can develop computational pipelines to analyse these data, in conjunction with data of their own that they can upload. Computationally estimated protein-protein interactions and biochemical pathways can be visualized at another site. Finally, we comment on our future plans and how they fit within this scalable system for the dissemination, visualization, and analysis of large multi-species data sets.