G. (2016). Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32453-9Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.•Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research.•You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact librarypure@kcl.ac.uk providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial Jordi Bruix, Shukui Qin, Philippe Merle, Alessandro Granito, Yi-Hsiang Huang, György Bodoky, Marc Pracht, Osamu Yokosuka, Olivier Rosmorduc, Valeriy Breder, René Gerolami, Gianluca Masi, Paul J Ross, Tianqiang Song, Jean-Pierre Bronowicki, Isabelle Ollivier-Hourmand, Masatoshi Kudo, Ann-Lii Cheng, Josep M Llovet, Richard S Finn, Marie-Aude LeBerre, Annette Baumhauer, Gerold Meinhardt, Guohong Han, on behalf of the RESORCE Investigators* SummaryBackground There are no systemic treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) whose disease progresses during sorafenib treatment. We aimed to assess the effi cacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with HCC who have progressed during sorafenib treatment.

Among patients with primary biliary cholangitis who had had an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid alone, treatment with bezafibrate in addition to ursodeoxycholic acid resulted in a rate of complete biochemical response that was significantly higher than the rate with placebo and ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. (Funded by Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique and Arrow Génériques; BEZURSO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01654731 .).

No abstract

In a randomized controlled trial of patients with advanced cirrhosis without recent fluoroquinolone therapy, norfloxacin did not reduce 6-month mortality, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Norfloxacin, however, appears to increase survival of patients with low ascites fluid protein concentrations. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01037959.

No abstract

No abstract

412 Background: Skin toxicity is a known adverse effect of multikinase inhibitors, and was shown to be a predictor of OS in patients (pts) with HCC treated with sorafenib (Reig M, 2014). In the RESORCE trial, regorafenib improved OS versus placebo in pts with HCC progressing on sorafenib (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50, 0.78; Bruix J, 2017). This retrospective analysis explored whether HFSR with regorafenib was associated with OS in RESORCE. Methods: Pts in RESORCE who were randomized to regorafenib 160 mg/day during the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle were divided into subgroups based on whether or not they had HFSR. Estimates of OS (95% CI) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Pts who were randomized, but not treated, were included in the no HFSR group for the analysis of survival. Results: Of 379 pts randomized, 374 received at least one dose of regorafenib. Of the treated pts, 53% (n = 199) had HFSR of any grade and 13% (n = 47) had grade 3 HFSR. Among pts with HFSR at any time during the study, 77% (n = 153) had the first HFSR event (any grade) during Cycle 1. Subgroups of pts with and without HFSR at any time had some imbalances in baseline characteristics (Table). OS was improved in pts who had HFSR at any time versus those who did not (Table). Pts who had a HFSR event during Cycle 1 also had improved OS versus those who did not (median OS 13.2 vs 8.5 months; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51, 0.86). Conclusions: In this post-hoc exploratory analysis, HFSR with regorafenib was associated with improved OS, as was previously shown for sorafenib. The potential confounding influence of baseline factors requires further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT01774344. [Table: see text]

No abstract