The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene/fluorinated-ethylene-propylene (ePTFE/FEP)-covered stents with that of uncovered nitinol stents for the palliation of malignant jaundice caused by inoperable pancreatic head cancer. Eighty patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. Bare nitinol stents were used in half of the patients, and ePTFE/FEP-covered stents were used in the remaining patients. Patency, survival, complications, and mean cost were calculated in both groups. Mean patency was 166.0 ± 13.11 days for the bare-stent group and 234.0 ± 20.87 days for the covered-stent group (p = 0.007). Primary patency rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 77.5, 69.8, and 69.8% for the bare-stent group and 97.5, 92.2, and 87.6% for the covered-stent group, respectively. Mean secondary patency was 123.7 ± 22.5 days for the bare-stent group and 130.3 ± 21.4 days for the covered-stent group. Tumour ingrowth occurred exclusively in the bare-stent group in 27.5% of cases (p = 0.002). Median survival was 203.2 ± 11.8 days for the bare-stent group and 247.0 ± 20 days for the covered-stent group (p = 0.06). Complications and mean cost were similar in both groups. Regarding primary patency and ingrowth rate, ePTFE/FEP-covered stents have shown to be significantly superior to bare nitinol stents for the palliation of malignant jaundice caused by inoperable pancreatic head cancer and pose comparable cost and complications. Use of a covered stent does not significantly influence overall survival rate; nevertheless, the covered endoprosthesis seems to offer result in fewer reinterventions and better quality of patient life.
This article expresses the current view of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) about radiation protection for endoscopic procedures, in particular endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Particular cases, including pregnant women and pediatric patients, are also discussed. This Guideline was developed by a group of endoscopists and medical physicists to ensure that all aspects of radiation protection are adequately dealt with. A two-page executive summary of evidence statements and recommendations is provided. The target readership for this Guideline mostly includes endoscopists, anesthesiologists, and endoscopy assistants who may be exposed to X-rays during endoscopic procedures.
The presence of CRH and urocortin (Ucn), members of the CRH family of neuropeptides, was examined in human gastric biopsies from normal controls and in patients with active gastritis from Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and after eradication treatment. RT-PCR analysis showed the presence of the Ucn transcript in biopsies (obtained by gastroscopy) from normal and inflamed gastric mucosa, whereas the CRH transcript was not detectable. Immunoreactive (ir-) Ucn was localized (by immunohistochemistry) in gastric epithelial cells and in inflammatory elements of the surrounding negative for Ucn gastric stroma. The level of ir-Ucn was higher in gastric biopsies from the group of patients with active H. pylori gastritis than in normal controls (10.4 +/- 1.8 vs. 2.0 +/- 1.3 pg/ micro g total protein; P < 0.001). After the apparent eradication of H. pylori infection (by clinical and morphological criteria) ir-Ucn levels increased dramatically to 43.1 +/- 9.8 pg/ micro g total protein, (P < 0.001) compared with pretreatment values. Interestingly, nonresponders to the eradication treatment did not show any significant change in ir-Ucn levels (18.7 +/- 12.3 pg/ micro g total protein) compared with their pretreatment values. In conclusion, our data suggest that in human gastric epithelium Ucn is present and plays an important physiological role, whereas CRH is absent. In addition, and in contrast to what has been found for CRH in ulcerative colitis, a highly significant, but negative, correlation has been found between Ucn levels and gastric inflammation, suggesting that Ucn may exert an antiinflammatory effect in gastric mucosa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.