Sedimentary successions of non‐marine basins can be considered in terms of accommodation space and sedimentary supply changes. Changes in accommodation space controlling the large‐scale architecture of non‐marine basins are different in areas with high and low sedimentary supplies. Uplift of intrabasinal monoclines and anticlines reduced the available accommodation space, resulting in changes in both the geometry of the depositional sequences and the large‐scale architecture of fluvial, mudflat and shallow carbonate lacustrine deposits. Main drainage fluvial systems record areas with a high sedimentary supply, while mudflats and shallow fluctuating lakes represent areas that received less sediment. Two end members in the large‐scale architecture of main drainage fluvial system in the Almazán Basin (Spain) are: (i) ribbon‐shaped channel fills with low interconnectivity which pass laterally into mudflats dominated by mudstones and evaporites and into palustrine and shallow carbonate lacustrine deposits (mainly in the A2 depositional sequence); and (ii) sheet‐like channel fills with high interconnectivity laterally correlated with stacked calcretes in the marginal mudflats (in the upper part of A3). Ribbon‐shaped channel fills formed in areas of high accommodation space and sheet‐like channel fills formed in areas of reduced accommodation space.

No abstract

The Upper Neoproterozoic±Lower Cambrian sedimentary succession in the central areas of the Central Iberian Zone has been subdivided into 12 mostly siliciclastic lithostratigraphic units, ranging in thickness between 1800 and 3900 m. The lithology and facies of each unit are described and the facies associations are interpreted. The facies resulted mainly from turbidity currents and debris flows and, to a lesser extent, from submarine slides and traction flows. The facies associations suggest that sedimentation took place in slope and base-of-slope environments. Two depositional sequences are recognized, separated by a type-1 unconformity. The lower sequence is of Late Neoproterozoic age (units I±IV) and exhibits lowstand, transgressive, and highstand systems tracts. Most of the upper sequence is probably of Early Cambrian age (units V±XII). It begins at the base of unit V and possibly ends with the Tamames Limestone Formation. The upper sequence records a lowstand systems tract and minor-order sea-level oscillations. In the Cambrian units there are higher amounts of feldspar and smaller quantities of intrabasinal clasts than in the Neoproterozoic units. The modal data plot close to the Q±L and Qm±Lt sides of Q±F±L and Qm±F±Lt triangular diagrams, suggesting a provenance from a recycled orogen evolving into a provenance from a craton interior towards the top of the succession. The chemical results, based mainly on Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 , Zr, and Nb abundances in shales from all the units, strongly suggest a gradual compositional change within this sedimentary succession. Together with the petrological data, the chemical results do not reveal any obvious coeval volcanic contribution to the sed-iments. On the basis of the chemical data, a comparison is made with other European zones containing detrital sediments composed of reworked crustal components.

No abstract

No abstract