[11C]PBR28 binds the 18-kDa Translocator Protein (TSPO) and is used in positron emission tomography (PET) to detect microglial activation. However, quantitative interpretations of signal are confounded by large interindividual variability in binding affinity, which displays a trimodal distribution compatible with a codominant genetic trait. Here, we tested directly for an underlying genetic mechanism to explain this. Binding affinity of PBR28 was measured in platelets isolated from 41 human subjects and tested for association with polymorphisms in TSPO and genes encoding other proteins in the TSPO complex. Complete agreement was observed between the TSPO Ala147Thr genotype and PBR28 binding affinity phenotype (P value=3.1 × 10−13). The TSPO Ala147Thr polymorphism predicts PBR28 binding affinity in human platelets. As all second-generation TSPO PET radioligands tested hitherto display a trimodal distribution in binding affinity analogous to PBR28, testing for this polymorphism may allow quantitative interpretation of TSPO PET studies with these radioligands.
11C-PBR28 PET can detect the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) expressed within macrophages. However, quantitative evaluation of the signal in brain tissue from donors with multiple sclerosis (MS) shows that PBR28 binds the TSPO with high affinity (binding affinity [Ki], ~4 nM), low affinity (Ki, ~200 nM), or mixed affinity (2 sites with Ki, ~4 nM and ~300 nM). Our study tested whether similar binding behavior could be detected in brain tissue from donors with no history of neurologic disease, with TSPO-binding PET ligands other than 11C-PBR28, for TSPO present in peripheral blood, and with human brain PET data acquired in vivo with 11C-PBR28. Methods The affinity of TSPO ligands was measured in the human brain post-mortem from donors with a history of MS (n = 13), donors without any history of neurologic disease (n = 20), and in platelets from healthy volunteers (n = 13). Binding potential estimates from thirty-five 11C-PBR28 PET scans from an independent sample of healthy volunteers were analyzed using a gaussian mixture model. Results Three binding affinity patterns were found in brains from subjects without neurologic disease in similar proportions to those reported previously from studies of MS brains. TSPO ligands showed substantial differences in affinity between subjects classified as high-affinity binders (HABs) and low-affinity binders (LABs). Differences in affinity between HABs and LABs are approximately 50-fold with PBR28, approximately 17-fold with PBR06, and approximately 4-fold with DAA1106, DPA713, and PBR111. Where differences in affinity between HABs and LABs were low (~4-fold), distinct affinities were not resolvable in binding curves for mixed-affinity binders (MABs), which appeared to express 1 class of sites with an affinity approximately equal to the mean of those for HABs and LABs. Mixed-affinity binding was detected in platelets from an independent sample (HAB, 69%; MAB, 31%), although LABs were not detected. Analysis of 11C-PBR28 PET data was not inconsistent with the existence of distinct subpopulations of HABs, MABs, and LABs. Conclusion With the exception of 11C-PK11195, all TSPO PET ligands in current clinical application recognize HABs, LABs, and MABs in brain tissue in vitro. Knowledge of subjects’ binding patterns will be required to accurately quantify TSPO expression in vivo using PET.
A PET tracer is desired to help guide the discovery and development of disease-modifying therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases characterized by neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), the predominant tau pathology in Alzheimer disease (AD). We describe the preclinical characterization of the NFT PET tracer 18 F-MK-6240. Methods: In vitro binding studies were conducted with 3 H-MK-6240 in tissue slices and homogenates from cognitively normal and AD human brain donors to evaluate tracer affinity and selectivity for NFTs. Immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated tau was performed on human brain slices for comparison with 3 H-MK-6240 binding patterns on adjacent brain slices. PET studies were performed with 18 F-MK-6240 in monkeys to evaluate tracer kinetics and distribution in the brain. 18 F-MK-6240 monkey PET studies were conducted after dosing with unlabeled MK-6240 to evaluate tracer binding selectivity in vivo. Results: The 3 H-MK-6240 binding pattern was consistent with the distribution of phosphorylated tau in human AD brain slices. 3 H-MK-6240 bound with high affinity to human AD brain cortex homogenates containing abundant NFTs but bound poorly to amyloid plaque-rich, NFT-poor AD brain homogenates. 3 H-MK-6240 showed no displaceable binding in the subcortical regions of human AD brain slices and in the hippocampus/entorhinal cortex of non-AD human brain homogenates. In monkey PET studies, 18 F-MK-6240 displayed rapid and homogeneous distribution in the brain. The 18 F-MK-6240 volume of distribution stabilized rapidly, indicating favorable tracer kinetics. No displaceable binding was observed in self-block studies in rhesus monkeys, which do not natively express NFTs. Moderate defluorination was observed as skull uptake. Conclusion: 18 F-MK-6240 is a promising PET tracer for the in vivo quantification of NFTs in AD patients. Cur rently, the clinical evaluation of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease (AD) requires large, resourceintensive clinical trials focused on measuring cognitive endpoints, which are highly variable. A biomarker that could be used early in clinical development to build confidence in the ability of a therapeutic mechanism to modify disease progression would provide a valuable bridge to investment in a large efficacy study once adequate pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability have been established. Biomarkers currently in use (e.g., volumetric MRI, amyloid plaque PET, cerebrospinal fluid measures of amyloid-b and tau) either do not directly inform on modification of disease pathology (volumetric MRI) or do not correlate strongly enough with cognitive decline to measure therapeutic response (amyloid plaque PET and cerebrospinal fluid measures) (1,2). Therefore, there is an unmet need for sensitive biomarkers that quantify early pathologic changes and correlate closely to disease progression and clinical outcomes.Histologic analysis of brains from human autopsy cases have shown that the density and distribution of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) correlate with cognitive decline ...
[11C]PBR28, a radioligand targeting the translocator protein (TSPO), does not produce a specific binding signal in approximately 14% of healthy volunteers. This phenomenon has not been reported for [11C]PK11195, another TSPO radioligand. We measured the specific binding signals with [3H]PK11195 and [3H]PBR28 in brain tissue from 22 donors. Overall, 23% of the samples did not generate a visually detectable specific autoradiographic signal with [3H]PBR28, although all samples showed [3H]PK11195 binding. There was a marked reduction in the affinity of [3H]PBR28 for TSPO in samples with no visible [3H]PBR28 autoradiographic signal ( K i=188±15.6 nmol/L), relative to those showing normal signal ( K i=3.4±0.5 nmol/L, P<0.001). Of this latter group, [3H]PBR28 bound with a two-site fit in 40% of cases, with affinities ( K i) of 4.0±2.4 nmol/L (high-affinity site) and 313±77 nmol/L (low-affinity site). There was no difference in Kd or Bmax for [3H]PK11195 in samples showing no [3H]PBR28 autoradiographic signal relative to those showing normal [3H]PBR28 autoradiographic signal. [3H]PK11195 bound with a single site for all samples. The existence of three different binding patterns with PBR28 (high-affinity binding (46%), low-affinity binding (23%), and two-site binding (31%)) suggests that a reduction in [11C]PBR28 binding may not be interpreted simply as a reduction in TSPO density. The functional significance of differences in binding characteristics warrants further investigation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.