Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) have been studied for their capacity to translocate across the lipid membrane of several cell types. In membrane translocation, these peptides can remarkably transport biologically active hydrophilic molecules, such as pharmaceuticals, nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) and even high-molecular-weight proteins, Fig. 3 into the cell cytoplasm and organelles. The development of CPPs as transduction agents includes the modification of gene and protein expression, the reprogramming and differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells and the preparation of cellular vaccines. A relatively recent field of CPP application is the transduction of plasmid DNA vectors and CPP-fusion proteins to modify genomes and introduce new traits in cells and organisms. CPP-mediated transduction of components for genome editing is an advantageous alternative to viral DNA vectors. Engineered site-specific nucleases, such as Cre recombinase, ZFN, TALENs and CRISPR associated protein (Cas), have been coupled to CPPs, and the fused proteins have been used to permeate targeted cells and tissues. The functionally active fusion CPP-nucleases subsequently home to the nucleus, incise genomic DNA at specific sites and induce repair and recombination. This review has the objective of discussing CPPs and elucidating the prospective use of CPP-mediated transduction technology, particularly in genome modification and transgenesis.

No abstract

The present study investigated the effects of crotamine, a cell-penetrating peptide from rattlesnake venom, at different exposure times and concentrations, on both developmental competence and gene expression (ATP1A1, AQP3, GLUT1 and GLUT3) of in vitro fertilized (IVF) bovine embryos. In Experiment 1, presumptive zygotes were exposed to 0.1 μM crotamine for 6, 12 or 24 h and control groups (vehicle and IVF) were included. In Experiment 2, presumptive zygotes were exposed to 0 (vehicle), 0.1, 1 and 10 μM crotamine for 24 h. Additionally, to visualize crotamine uptake, embryos were exposed to rhodamine B-labelled crotamine and subjected to confocal microscopy. In Experiment 1, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed among different exposure times and control groups for cleavage and blastocyst rates and total cells number per blastocyst. Within each exposure time, mRNA levels were similar (P > 0.05) in embryos cultured with or without crotamine. In Experiment 2, concentrations as high as 10 μM crotamine did not affect (P > 0.05) the blastocyst rate. Crotamine at 0.1 and 10 μM did not alter mRNA levels when compared with the control (P > 0.05). Remarkably, only 1 μM crotamine decreased both ATP1A1 and AQP3 expression levels relative to the control group (P < 0.05). Also, it was possible to visualize the intracellular localization of crotamine. These results indicate that crotamine can translocate intact IVF bovine embryos and its application in the culture medium is possible at concentrations from 0.1-10 μM for 6-24 h.

Purpose Crotamine is capable of penetrating cells and embryos and transfecting cells with exogenous DNA. However, no studies are available regarding its uptake by parthenogenetic (PA) embryos or its use for transfection in in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos. This study aimed to determine the translocation kinetics of crotamine into PA and IVF bovine embryos and assess its effect over in vitro development of PA embryos. Moreover, crotamine-DNA complexes were used to test the transfection ability of crotamine in bovine IVF zygotes. Methods PA and IVF embryos were exposed to labeled crotamine for four interval times. Embryo toxicity was assayed over PA embryos after 24 h of exposure to crotamine. Additionally, IVF embryos were exposed to or injected with a complex formed by crotamine and pCX-EGFP plasmid. Results Confocal images revealed that crotamine was uptaken by PA and IVF embryos as soon as 1 h after exposure. Crotamine exposure did not affect two to eight cells and blastocyst rates or blastocyst cell number (p > 0.05) of PA embryos. Regarding transfection, exposure or injection into the perivitelline space with crotamine-DNA complex did not result in transgeneexpressing embryos. Nevertheless, intracytoplasmic injection of plasmid alone showed higher expression rates than did injection with crotamine-DNA complex at days 4 and 7 (p < 0.05). Conclusions Crotamine is able to translocate through zona pellucida (ZP) of PA and IVF embryos within 1 h of exposure without impairing in vitro development. However, the use of crotamine does not improve exogenous DNA expression in cattle embryos, probably due to the tight complexation of DNA with crotamine.

No abstract