Are new models needed to optimise the utilisation of new medicines to sustain healthcare systems?Godman B 1,2,3 , Malmström RE 4 , Diogene E 5 , Gray A 6 , Jayathissa S 7 , Timoney A 8 , Acurcio FA 9,10 , Alkan A 11 , Brzezinska A 12 , Bucsics A 13 , Campbell S 14,15 AbstractIntroduction: Medicines have made an appreciable contribution to improving health. However, even high income countries are struggling to fund new premium-priced medicines. This will grow necessitating the development of new models to optimise their use. Objective: Review case histories among health authorities to improve the utilisation and expenditure on new medicines. Subsequently, use these to develop exemplar models and outline their implications. Challenges and proposed models: A number of issues and challenges have been identified including the limited innovation level of new medicines alongside increasing requested prices for their reimbursement especially for oncology, orphan diseases, diabetes and HCV. Models centre on the three pillars of pre-, peri, and post-launch including critical drug evaluation and multi-criteria models for valuing medicines for orphan diseases alongside potentially capping pharmaceutical expenditure Discussion: Proposed models which involve all key stakeholder groups are critical for the sustainability of healthcare systems or enhancing universal access. The models should help stimulate debate as well as restore trust between key stakeholder groups.

The Swedish Ticlopidine Multicentre Study (STIMS) was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial designed to determine whether ticlopidine, a platelet antiaggregatory agent, reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke and transitory ischaemic attacks in patients with intermittent claudication. A total of 687 patients was monitored for a minimum of 5 years or until an end-point was reached. The number of end points (99 vs. 89), analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle, was 11.4% lower in the ticlopidine group (P = 0.24). The mortality rate was 29.1% lower in the ticlopidine group (64 vs. 89, P = 0.015); this observation could be accounted for by a reduced mortality from ischaemic heart disease. On-treatment analysis showed there to be significantly fewer end points in the ticlopidine group (47 vs. 76, P = 0.017). Diarrhoea was the most common side-effect. Reversible leucopenia or thrombocytopenia was reported in seven patients on ticlopidine. It is concluded that the high morbidity and mortality from cardio- and cerebrovascular disease in patients with intermittent claudication can be reduced by long-term treatment with ticlopidine.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract