Background: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is contained within normal gastric mucosa epithelial tight junctions; upon malignant transformation, CLDN18.2 epitopes become exposed. Zolbetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody, mediates specific killing of CLDN18.2-positive cells through immune effector mechanisms. Patients and methods: The FAST study enrolled advanced gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction and oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients (aged 18 years) with moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression in 40% tumour cells. Patients received first-line epirubicin þ oxaliplatin þ capecitabine (EOX, arm 1, n ¼ 84) every 3 weeks (Q3W), or zolbetuximab þ EOX (loading dose, 800 mg/m 2 then 600 mg/m 2 Q3W) (arm 2, n ¼ 77). Arm 3 (exploratory) was added after enrolment initiation (zolbetuximab þ EOX 1000 mg/m 2 Q3W, n ¼ 85). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: In the overall population, both PFS [hazard ratio (HR) ¼ 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.67; P < 0.0005] and OS (HR ¼ 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P < 0.0005) were significantly improved with zolbetuximab þ EOX (arm 2) compared with EOX alone (arm 1). This significant PFS benefit was retained in patients with moderate-tostrong CLDN18.2 expression in 70% of tumour cells (HR ¼ 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.62; P < 0.0005). Significant improvement in PFS was also reported in the overall population of arm 3 versus arm 1 (HR ¼ 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.85; P ¼ 0.0114) but not in high CLDN18.2-expressing patients; no significant improvement in OS was observed in either population. Most adverse events (AEs) related to zolbetuximab þ EOX (nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, anaemia) were grade 1-2. Grade 3 AEs showed no substantial increases overall (zolbetuximab þ EOX versus EOX alone). Conclusions: In advanced gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction and oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients expressing CLDN18.2, adding zolbetuximab to first-line EOX provided longer PFS and OS versus EOX alone. Zolbetuximab þ EOX was generally tolerated and AEs were manageable. Zolbetuximab 800/600 mg/m 2 is being evaluated in phase III studies based on clinical benefit observed in the overall population and in patients with moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression in 70% of tumour cells.

Background: Cell-free DNA from dying cells recently has been discovered in human blood plasma. In experiments performed on animals and humans, we examined whether this cell-free DNA can cross the kidney barrier and be used as a diagnostic tool. Methods: Mice received subcutaneous injections of either human Raji cells or purified 32P-labeled DNA. DNA was isolated from urine and analyzed by measurement of radioactivity, agarose gel electrophoresis, and PCR. In humans, the permeability of the kidney barrier to polymeric DNA was assessed by detection in urine of sequences that were different from an organism bulk nuclear DNA. Results: In the experiments on laboratory animals, we found that ∼0.06% of injected DNA was excreted into urine within 3 days in a polymeric form and that human-specific Alu sequences that passed through the kidneys could be amplified by PCR. In humans, male-specific sequences could be detected in the urine of females who had been transfused with male blood as well as in DNA isolated from urine of women pregnant with male fetuses. K-ras mutations were detected in the urine of patients with colon adenocarcinomas and pancreatic carcinomas. Conclusions: The data suggest that the kidney barrier in rodents and humans is permeable to DNA molecules large enough to be analyzed by standard genetic methodologies.

The selective MEK1/2 inhibitor pimasertib has shown anti-tumour activity in a pancreatic tumour model. This phase I/II, two-part trial was conducted in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPaCa) (NCT01016483). In the phase I part, oral pimasertib was given once daily discontinuously (5 days on/2 days off treatment) or twice daily continuously (n = 53) combined with weekly gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m ) in 28-day cycles to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of pimasertib. In the phase II part, patients were randomised to pimasertib (RP2D) or placebo plus weekly gemcitabine (n = 88) to investigate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The RP2D was determined to be 60 mg BID. PFS and OS outcomes did not indicate any treatment benefit for pimasertib over placebo in combination with gemcitabine (median PFS 3.7 and 2.8 months, respectively, HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.58-1.42: median OS 7.3 vs. 7.6 months, respectively). KRAS status did not influence PFS or OS. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 91.1% and 85.7% for pimasertib/gemcitabine and placebo/gemcitabine respectively, but there was a higher incidence of ocular events with pimasertib/gemcitabine (28.9% vs. 4.8% for placebo/gemcitabine). In conclusion, no clinical benefit was observed with first-line pimasertib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with mPaCa.

With inadequate data from randomized controlled trials at the moment, our report indicates that second-line chemotherapy is effective and beneficial in patients with good performance status, higher Hb level along with higher TTP under first-line therapy.

No abstract