No abstract

reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from ELEKTA, during the conduct of the study. Dr Langendijk reports that the department of radiation oncology has research agreements with IBA, MIRADA and Raysearch. He has received a fee from IBA for giving a presentation at a symposium and giving consultancy.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objectives:To evaluate the clinicopathologic features, and explore the treatment outcomes of synchronous, or metachronous second primary malignancies (SPM) in conjunction with differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC).Methods:This retrospective study was conducted on 823 DTC patients treated between 2000 and 2012 at 2 tertiary care hospitals (King Fahad Medical City and King Khalid University Hospital) in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Forty-one (5%) DTC patients were found to have SPM (61% metachronous and 39% synchronous). These patients with SPM were studied for clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes.Results:The patients with DTC and SPM were older (median age: 54.3 years) than those without SPM (median age: 43.2 years); p=0.04. The frequency of SPM was breast (51.2%), colon (12.2%), kidney (7.3%), astrocytoma (7.3%), parotid (7.3%), rectum (4.9%), lymphoma (4.9%), nasopharynx (2.4%), and stomach (2.4%). Median follow-up was 8.05 years. Ten-year disease free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates were lower in DTC patients with SPM (56.1% for 10-year survival, and 71.7% for OS) than without SPM (95.5% for 10-year survival, and 97.8% for OS); p=0.0001. Metachronous SPM had better 10-year disease free survival rates (60.2%) than synchronous SPM (45%).Conclusion:The co-occurrence of SPM with DTC affects long-term disease free survival and OS rates.

PURPOSE To examine the trends and quality metrics of publications by radiation oncologists in Saudi Arabia. METHODS PubMed was searched using names of all Saudi radiation oncologists to retrieve published articles between January 2010 and December 2019. International collaboration, journal impact factor and country of origin, and number of citations were collected. Each article was assessed for epidemiologic type and independently assigned a level of evidence (LOE) by two authors. The trend in publications was examined and compared in the first and second 5-year periods (2010-2014 and 2015-2019) using relevant parameters. RESULTS A total of 186 publications were found and included. The most common type of research was cohort studies followed by case reports and case series in 24%, 14%, and 13% of all publications, respectively. Dosimetry, clinical, and preclinical studies formed 7%, 8.6%, and 7.5% of the total publications, respectively. The LOE was I, II, III, IV, and not applicable in 8.6%, 22%, 25.8%, 29%, and 14.5% of the included publications, respectively. Comparing the first and second 5-year periods, there was an increase in international collaboration ( P < .001) in the second period. The number of citations ( P < .001) and journal impact factor ( P = .028) were lower in the second period. LOE and publications in international journals were not statistically different between the two periods. CONCLUSION Although radiation oncology research activity in Saudi Arabia has gained momentum in terms of volume and international collaboration over time, the LOE has not improved. This calls for a national effort to make the contribution to the literature a priority, allocate adequate resources, and apply appropriate measures to enhance research productivity and quality.

No abstract