On the basis of morphological features, we subclassified 189 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas into two subtypes: bile duct and cholangiolar. The cholangiolar type is composed of cuboidal to low columnar tumor cells that contain scanty cytoplasm. The bile duct type is composed of tall columnar tumor cells arranged in a large glandular pattern. In this study, 77 (41%) tumors were classified as the cholangiolar type and 112 (59%) tumors were classified as the bile duct type. The cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was more frequently associated with viral hepatitis, whereas all but one intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma associated with intrahepatic lithiasis were classified as the bile duct type. Biliary intraepithelial neoplasm or intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct could be identified in 50 bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (45%), but in only 3 cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (4%). Cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas frequently expressed N-cadherin, whereas bile duct intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were more likely to express S100P, Trefoil factor 1, and anterior gradient 2. KRAS is mutated in 23 of 98 (23%) bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and in only 1 of 76 (1%) cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas had a higher frequency of IDH1 or 2 mutations than did the bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. The molecular features of the bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were similar to those of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with the cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had higher 5-year survival rates than those of patients with the bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our results indicated that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was a heterogeneous tumor. Subclassification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas based on cholangiocytic differentiation divides them into two groups with different etiologies, clinical manifestations, and molecular pathogeneses.

Orexin A and B are hypothalamic peptides known to modulate arousal, feeding and reward via OX1 and OX2 receptors. Orexins are also antinociceptive in the brain but their mechanism(s) of action remain unclear. Here, we investigated the antinociceptive mechanism of orexin A in the rat ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG), a midbrain region crucial for initiating descending pain inhibition. In vlPAG slices, orexin A (30-300 nM) depressed GABAergic evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs). This effect was blocked by an OX1 (SB 334867), but not OX2 (Compound 29), antagonist. Orexin A increased the paired-pulse ratio of paired IPSCs, and decreased the frequency, but not amplitude, of miniature IPSCs. Orexin A-induced IPSC depression was mimicked by WIN 55,212-2, a cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptor agonist. AM 251, a CB1 antagonist, reversed depressant effects by both agonists. Orexin A-induced IPSC depression was prevented by U73122 and tetrahydrolipstatin, inhibitors of phospholipase C (PLC) and diacylglycerol lipase (DAGL), respectively, and enhanced by URB602, which inhibits enzymatic degradation of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). Moderate DAGLα, but not DAGLβ, immunoreactivity was observed in the vlPAG. Orexin A produced an overall excitatory effect on evoked postsynaptic potentials and hence increased vlPAG neuronal activity. Intra-vlPAG microinjection of orexin A reduced hot-plate nociceptive responses in rats in a manner blocked by SB 334867 and AM 251. Therefore, orexin A may produce antinociception by activating postsynaptic OX1 receptors, stimulating synthesis of 2-AG, an endocannabinoid, through a Gq-protein-mediated PLC-DAGLα enzymatic cascade culminating in retrograde inhibition of GABA release (disinhibition) in the vlPAG.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common fatal cancers worldwide. Other than the sorafenib treatment, no effective systemic therapy has been available thus far. Most targets in molecularly targeted therapy for cancer are receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Therefore, identifying activated RTKs in HCC is critical for developing new molecularly targeted therapies. Using a phospho-RTK array, we found that Axl is one of the most frequently activated RTKs in liver cancer cell lines. The knockdown of Axl by RNA interference significantly reduced cell migration and invasion in the HCC cell lines HA22T and Mahlavu. Stimulation of HCC cell lines by Axl ligand growth arrest-specific 6 (Gas6) enhanced cell migration and invasion. The Gas6/Axl pathway enhanced the expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition-inducing transcription factor Slug, which is essential for the invasion-promoting activity of Axl. Treating HCC cells with the Axl inhibitor bosutinib suppressed Slug expression and decreased the invasiveness of HCC cell lines. These findings indicate that Gas6/Axl regulates tumor invasion through the transcriptional activation of Slug.

Our study indicated that the TERT promoter mutation frequently occurred in HCV-associated HCCs. The absence of Hepatitis B infection was significantly associated with the TERT promoter mutation. These findings suggest that various etiological factors may be involved in differing mechanisms to preserve telomeres during the carcinogenesis of HCCs.