Importance and Objective:
Frailty refers to the decline in physiological reserve capacity caused by the deterioration of multiple physiological systems (brain, endocrine system, immune system, and skeletal muscle), leading to increased vulnerability and decreased stress capacity. Women have a higher prevalence of frailty than men, although the epidemiological factors underlying this phenomenon are not fully understood. Menopause and menopause-related characteristics may be among the contributing factors. Hence, the purpose of this scoping review was to explore the relationship between menopause and frailty. We attempted to summarize information such as the age that menopause occurs, years since menopause, types of menopause, and hormones and inflammatory markers of frailty among postmenopausal women.
Methods:
PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Web of Science, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the China Biomedical Literature Service System, Wanfang Database and the WeiPu (VIP) Database were searched from inception until April 3, 2019. Supplementary searches of the references, cited documents, and similar documents of the included literature were also carried out.
Discussion and Conclusions:
Of 762 papers identified, 15 articles matching the criteria were included. The prevalence of frailty among postmenopausal women ranged from 5.9% to 57.3%. Existing studies suggest that menopause is associated with frailty. Early menopause, hysterectomy, low-free testosterone levels, and high C-reactive protein levels may increase the likelihood of frailty among postmenopausal women. Few original studies have explored the relationship between estrogen and frailty and the results of these studies are conflicting. Changes in hormone and inflammatory cytokine levels may mediate frailty among postmenopausal women. More in-depth research would be required to better understand the physiological and etiological mechanisms of the occurrence of frailty among postmenopausal women.
Introduction Diabetes mellitus is an expanding global health problem. Currently, the home management of diabetes is mainly led by a multidisciplinary team based on telemedicine. However, the role nurses play in it remains inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of nurse-led web-based intervention on glycated haemoglobin, blood pressure and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods An exhaustive systematic literature search was undertaken using the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and CINAHL. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the studies by examining the risk of bias and using Modified Jadad Score system. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that had been published from inception to July 2020, using Review Manager 5.3. Results Eleven randomized controlled trials were selected that included 2063 participants. Meta-analyses results indicated significant effects on not only glycated haemoglobin (pooled mean difference (MD) = –0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): –0.5 to –0.26, p < 0.00001), but also on systolic blood pressure (pooled MD = –1.91, 95% CI: –3.73 to –0.09, p = 0.04) and low density lipoprotein (pooled standardized MD = –0.29, 95% CI: –0.44 to –0.15, p < 0.0001). There were no effects of nurse-led web-based intervention on fasting blood glucose, diastolic blood pressure, high density lipoprotein, body mass index and triglycerides. Discussion Nurse-led web-based intervention is a promising way to complement routine clinical care. However, the specific intervention content and intervention media still need to carry out large-scale well-designed randomized controlled trials. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD 42020204565.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.