Plants display considerable developmental plasticity in response to changing environmental conditions. The adaptations of the root system to variations in N supply are an excellent example of such developmental plasticity. In Arabidopsis, four morphological adaptations to the N supply have been characterized: (i) a localized stimulatory effect of external nitrate on lateral root elongation; (ii) a systemic inhibitory effect of high tissue nitrate concentrations on the activation of lateral root meristems; (iii) a suppression of lateral root initiation by high C:N ratios, and (iv) an inhibition of primary root growth and stimulation of root branching by external L-glutamate. These responses have provided valuable experimental systems for the study of N signalling in plants. This article will highlight some recent progress made in this direction from studies using the Arabidopsis root system. One recent development of note has been the emerging evidence of a regulatory role of nitrate transporters in some of the responses. It has been reported that the AtNRT1.1 (CHL1) dual-affinity nitrate transporter acts upstream of the ANR1 MADS box gene in mediating the stimulatory effect of a localized nitrate supply on lateral root proliferation. The AtNRT2.1 high-affinity nitrate transporter seems to be involved in the repression of lateral root initiation by high C:N ratios. The systemic inhibitory effect of high nitrate supply on lateral root development, which is mediated by abscisic acid (ABA), may be linked to the recently identified ABA receptor, FCA. The newly discovered root architectural response to external L-glutamate potentially offers a valuable experimental tool for studying the biological function of plant glutamate receptors and amino acid signalling.

SUMMARYIt is well known that abscisic acid (ABA) can halt meristems for long periods without loss of meristem function, and can also promote root growth at low concentrations, but the mechanisms underlying such regulation are largely unknown. Here we show that ABA promotes stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis root meristems by both promoting the quiescence of the quiescent centre (QC) and suppressing the differentiation of stem cells and their daughters. We demonstrate that these two mechanisms of regulation by ABA involve distinct pathways, and identify components in each pathway. Our findings demonstrate a cellular mechanism for a positive role for ABA in promoting root meristem maintenance and root growth in Arabidopsis.

Histidine (His) is an essential ingredient for protein synthesis and is required by all living organisms. In higher plants, although there is considerable evidence that His is essential for plant growth and survival, there is very little information as to whether it plays any specific role in plant development. Here, we present evidence for such a role of this amino acid in root development in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) from the characterization of a novel Arabidopsis mutant, hpa1, which has a very short root system and carries a mutation in one of the two Arabidopsis histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase (HPA) genes, AtHPA1. We have established that AtHPA1 encodes a functional HPA and that its complete knockout is embryo lethal. Biochemical analysis shows that the mutation in hpa1 only resulted in a 30% reduction in free His content and had no significant impact on the total His content. It did not cause any known symptoms of His starvation. However, the mutant displayed a specific developmental defect in root meristem maintenance and was unable to sustain primary root growth 2 d after germination. We have demonstrated that the root meristem failure in the mutant is tightly linked to the reduction in free His content and could be rescued by either exogenous His supplementation or AtHPA1 overexpression. Our results therefore reveal an important role of His homeostasis in plant development.

SummaryThe elite UK winter wheat cv. Riband was transformed with constructs containing rbcS in sense and antisense orientations driven by the maize ubiquitin promoter with a transformation efficiency of 1.2%. Of 77 primary transformants 31% of the sense‐rbcS transformed lines and 78% of the antisense‐rbcS transformed lines had decreased rubisco content compared to wild‐type and marker‐only controls, with decreases of up to 60%. However, in the T1 progeny which inherited the transgene, only 5% showed significantly decreased rubisco content and these effects were on the margins of significance. Five potential T2 homozygous lines from T1 parents which had transgene segregation consistent with a single locus were identified. There was no significant decrease in rubisco content relative to wild‐type in any of these lines (LSD of 8% for P= 0.05). Expression of antisense rbcS transgenes in two of these T2 lines was low but was increased following exposure of the plants to 37°C for 48 h. However this did not induce a significant decrease in rubisco protein content relative to controls. Southern analysis of two antisense lines showed that they had low copy number and 1–2 insertion events. In one of the two lines there was increased methylation of the ubiquitin intron in T2 samples compared to the TO primary transformant. Further work is required to establish whether methylation occurred in all the lines which lost the phenotype, and therefore the likelihood of this being the cause. The disappearance of the decreased rubisco‐content phenotype between generations may therefore be attributable to (1) greater activity of the ubiquitin promoter due to greater stress in the T0 generation plants and/or (2) increased methylation of the transgene promoter region between generations.