Surgical resection for recurrent BTC may prolong survival in highly selected patients. A hepatectomy might offer a survival benefit for patients with a solitary liver metastasis.
Background/Purpose: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy and current predictors of POPF are inadequate. We developed a new fistula score to more accurately predict POPF. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 169 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2010 and August 2021 at our institution and examined patients' risk factors according to the occurrence of grade B/C POPF. Muscle and fat were assessed on preoperative computed tomography images and cutoff values were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.Results: Grade B/C POPF occurred in 38 (22.5%) patients. Multivariate analysis of patients' risk factors revealed that sarcopenic obesity (odds ratio [OR] 2.94; p = .033), L3 subcutaneous fat area (SFA) ≥ 98.0 cm 2 (OR 2.69; p = .049), and soft pancreatic texture (OR 27.5; p = .002) were independent risk factors of grade B/C POPF occurrence. In addition, a new fistula risk score based on these factors revealed that 63.6% of patients with high scores developed grade B/C POPF, while those with negligible or low scores did not.
Conclusions:A new fistula risk scoring system based on sarcopenic obesity, SFA, and pancreatic texture may accurately predict POFP.
Background
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication of gastrointestinal surgery. Olanexidine gluconate (OLG) is a novel skin antiseptic that is effective against a wide range of bacteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bactericidal efficacy of OLG in gastrointestinal cancer surgery.
Methods
This retrospective study included a total of 281 patients who underwent gastrointestinal cancer surgery (stomach or colon). The patients were divided into two groups: 223 patients were treated with OLG (OLG group), and 58 patients were treated with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) (control group). The efficacy and safety outcomes were measured as the rate of SSI within 30 days after surgery. In addition, we conducted subgroup analyses according to the surgical approach (open or laparoscopic) or primary lesion (stomach or colon).
Results
There was a significant difference in the rate of SSI between the control group and OLG group (10.3% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.02). There was a significant difference in the SSI rate in terms of superficial infection (8.6% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.0345) but not in deep infection (1.7% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.371). There was no significant difference between the control group and OLG group in the overall rate of adverse skin reactions (5.2% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.157).
Conclusion
This retrospective study demonstrates that OLG is more effective than PVP-I in preventing SSI during gastrointestinal cancer surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.