The goal of this study was to determine the changes that occur in surfactant-associated proteins in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and serum of patients at risk for ARDS and during the course of ARDS. We found that the concentrations of SP-A and SP-B were low in the BAL of patients at risk for ARDS before the onset of clinically defined lung injury, whereas the concentration of SP-D was normal. In patients with established ARDS, BAL SP-A and SP-B concentrations were low during the entire 14-d observation period, but the median SP-D concentrations remained in the normal range. Immunoreactive SP-A and SP-D were not increased in the serum of patients at risk for ARDS, but both increased after the onset of ARDS to a maximum on Day 3 and remained elevated for as long as 14 d. The BAL SP-A concentrations were significantly lower in at-risk patients who developed ARDS, and no patient with a BAL SP-A concentration greater than 1.2 microg/ml developed ARDS. On Days 1 and 3 of ARDS, the BAL SP-D concentration was significantly lower in patients who died, and the BAL SP-D concentration was significantly related to the PI(O(2))/FI(O(2)) ratio. Thus, surfactant protein abnormalities occur before and after the onset of ARDS, and the responses of SP-A, SP-B, and SP-D differ in important ways. The BAL SP-A and SP-D measurements can be used to classify patients as high or low risk for progression to ARDS and/or death after the onset of ARDS. Strategies to increase these surfactant proteins in the lungs of patients with ARDS could be useful to modify the onset or the course of ARDS.

No abstract

Pulmonary surfactant protein D (SP-D) is a hydrophilic glycoprotein with a reduced molecular mass of 43 kDa and a member of the C-type lectin superfamily, along with mannose-binding proteins and surfactant protein A (SP-A). We have recently prepared monoclonal antibodies against human SP-D and developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In this study, the levels of SP-D in sera and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids of patients with lung diseases were determined by ELISA, using human recombinant SP-D as a standard. We demonstrated that the concentrations of SP-D in sera are prominently increased in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), interstitial pneumonia with collagen disease (IPCD), and pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP). Patients with IPF, IPCD, and PAP exhibited levels of serum SP-D 5.1-fold, 7.2-fold, and 7.0-fold, respectively, of those in healthy volunteers; 91.5% of the patients with IPF, 81.3% with IPCD, and 100% with PAP exhibited serum SP-D levels that exceeded the cut-off value (mean + 2 SD of control value). Serum SP-D levels appeared to reflect the disease activity of IPF and IPCD and the disease severity of PAP. High levels of SP-D in BAL fluids were shown in patients with PAP, but not with IPF and IPCD. We conclude that measurement of SP-D in sera can provide an easily identifiable and useful clinical marker for the diagnosis of IPF, IPCD, and PAP, and can predict the disease activity of IPF and IPCD and the disease severity of PAP.

To find a less-invasive and lung-specific clinical biomarker, we measured serum levels of surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A and SP-D) by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in 42 patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) to evaluate their significance in relation to the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and to assess their diagnostic merits. The patients were divided into two groups based on findings by chest computed tomography (CT): 30 patients with ILD (CT-positive ILD group), and 12 patients without any lung abnormalities (CT-negative ILD group). The CT-positive ILD group was further divided into two groups: 24 patients with ILD detectable by chest plain radiography (X-ray-positive ILD group) and six patients with ILD showing no abnormality (X-ray-negative ILD group). The levels of SP-A and SP-D in sera were significantly higher in the CT-positive ILD group than in the CT-negative ILD group. They were also significantly higher in the X-ray-positive ILD group than in the CT-negative ILD group. In the X-ray-negative ILD group, their levels were higher than those of the CT-negative ILD group. We next estimated sensitivity and specificity of SP-A, SP-D, and X-ray for detecting ILD on CT. Sensitivity of SP-D was high (77%) as well as that of X-ray (80%), whereas SP-A showed a low sensitivity (33%). Remarkably, five of six patients in the X-ray-negative ILD group showed SP-D concentrations over its cut-off level, thereby demonstrating that an SP-D assay contributes to the detection of ILD overlooked by X-ray. Moreover, a combination of X-ray and SP-D dramatically increases sensitivity to 97%. Specificity of SP-A, SP-D, and X-ray to the CT-negative ILD group was 100%, 83%, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates that elevated levels of serum SP-A and SP-D reflect well the presence of ILD and that the combination of SP-D and X-ray contributes to reduce the risk of clinicians overlooking ILD complicated by PSS, although a repetition in another set of subjects is needed to confirm these indications.