Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the number of coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome is rapidly increasing. The heterogeneity of coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome contributes to the complexity of managing patients. Here we described two patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome showing that the bedside physiological approach including careful evaluation of respiratory system mechanics and visualization of ventilation with electrical impedance tomography was useful to individualize ventilatory management.
Background Heterogeneity is an inherent nature of ARDS. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio has been developed to identify the patients who has lung recruitablity. This technique might be useful to identify the patients that match specific interventions, such as higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or prone position or both. We aimed to evaluate the physiological effects of PEEP and body position on lung mechanics and regional lung inflation in COVID-19-associated ARDS and to propose the optimal ventilatory strategy based on recruitment-to-inflation ratio. Methods Patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were consecutively enrolled. Lung recruitablity (recruitment-to-inflation ratio) and regional lung inflation (electrical impedance tomography [EIT]) were measured with a combination of body position (supine or prone) and PEEP (low 5 cmH2O or high 15 cmH2O). The utility of recruitment-to-inflation ratio to predict responses to PEEP were examined with EIT. Results Forty-three patients were included. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio was 0.68 (IQR 0.52–0.84), separating high recruiter versus low recruiter. Oxygenation was the same between two groups. In high recruiter, a combination of high PEEP with prone position achieved the highest oxygenation and less dependent silent spaces in EIT (vs. low PEEP in both positions) without increasing non-dependent silent spaces in EIT. In low recruiter, low PEEP in prone position resulted in better oxygenation (vs. both PEEPs in supine position), less dependent silent spaces (vs. low PEEP in supine position) and less non-dependent silent spaces (vs. high PEEP in both positions). Recruitment-to-inflation ratio was positively correlated with the improvement in oxygenation and respiratory system compliance, the decrease in dependent silent spaces, and was inversely correlated with the increase in non-dependent silent spaces, when applying high PEEP. Conclusions Recruitment-to-inflation ratio may be useful to personalize PEEP in COVID-19-associated ARDS. Higher PEEP in prone position and lower PEEP in prone position decreased the amount of dependent silent spaces (suggesting lung collapse) without increasing the amount of non-dependent silent spaces (suggesting overinflation) in high recruiter and in low recruiter, respectively.
BACKGROUNDVocal cord paralysis (VCP) is a rare complication of thoracic cardiovascular surgery. In severe cases, life-threatening airway obstruction may occur.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the incidence and severity of VCP among patients who underwent thoracic cardiovascular surgery and to identify possible risk factors.DESIGNSingle-centre retrospective review of adult patients.SETTINGOsaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan, from January 2013 to August 2015.PATIENTSWe included 688 patients in the final analysis. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected from medical records. Patients with preoperative VCP or tracheostomy prior to extubation were excluded. The VCP severity in relation to functional recovery was graded using the following categories: absent; mild, remission at 6 months; moderate, partial or persistent VCP at 6 months; or severe, airway obstruction after extubation requiring reintubation. An otolaryngologist diagnosed all VCP cases.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe incidence and severity of VCP after extubation.RESULTSThe incidence (number) of VCP was 4.7% (32), with those of mild, moderate and severe VCP being 1.7% (12), 1.5% (10) and 1.5% (10), respectively. The ICU stay was significantly longer in patients with severe VCP than in patients without VCP [12.5 days (interquartile range 5.5 to 25.5) vs. 3 days (interquartile range 2 to 5), P = 0.0002]. In our multivariable analysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus [odds ratio (OR) 1.853, P = 0.009], intubation period (OR per 24 h 1.136, P = 0.014), ascending aortic arch surgery with brachiocephalic artery reconstruction (OR 8.708, P < 0.001) and ventricular assist device implantation (OR 3.460, P = 0.005) were independent predictors for VCP.CONCLUSIONThe identification of these risk factors may facilitate screening for VCP before extubation and possibly help anaesthesia personnel to be prepared to treat VCP-related airway obstruction should it occur.
Objectives: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is often observed during mechanical ventilation and is associated with higher mortality. We hypothesized that patient-ventilator asynchrony causes lung and diaphragm injury and dysfunction. Design: Prospective randomized animal study. Setting: University research laboratory. Subjects: Eighteen New Zealand White rabbits. Interventions: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) model was established by depleting surfactants. Each group (assist control, breath stacking, and reverse triggering) was simulated by phrenic nerve stimulation. The effects of each group on lung function, lung injury (wet-to-dry lung weight ratio, total protein, and interleukin-6 in bronchoalveolar lavage), diaphragm function (diaphragm force generation curve), and diaphragm injury (cross-sectional area of diaphragm muscle fibers, histology) were measured. Diaphragm RNA sequencing was performed using breath stacking and assist control (n = 2 each). Measurements and Main Results: Inspiratory effort generated by phrenic nerve stimulation was small and similar among groups (esophageal pressure swing ≈ –2.5 cm H2O). Breath stacking resulted in the largest tidal volume (>10 mL/kg) and highest inspiratory transpulmonary pressure, leading to worse oxygenation, worse lung compliance, and lung injury. Reverse triggering did not cause lung injury. No asynchrony events were observed in assist control, whereas eccentric contractions occurred in breath stacking and reverse triggering, but more frequently in breath stacking. Breath stacking and reverse triggering significantly reduced diaphragm force generation. Diaphragmatic histology revealed that the area fraction of abnormal muscle was ×2.5 higher in breath stacking (vs assist control) and ×2.1 higher in reverse triggering (vs assist control). Diaphragm RNA sequencing analysis revealed that genes associated with muscle differentiation and contraction were suppressed, whereas cytokine- and chemokine-mediated proinflammatory responses were activated in breath stacking versus assist control. Conclusions: Breath stacking caused lung and diaphragm injury, whereas reverse triggering caused diaphragm injury. Thus, careful monitoring and management of patient-ventilator asynchrony may be important to minimize lung and diaphragm injury from spontaneous breathing in ARDS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.