ObjectiveThis trial compared the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib with TACE alone using a newly established TACE-specific endpoint and pre-treatment of sorafenib before initial TACE.DesignPatients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were randomised to TACE plus sorafenib (n=80) or TACE alone (n=76). Patients in the combination group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2–3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable (unTACEable) progression (TTUP), defined as untreatable tumour progression, transient deterioration to Child-Pugh C or appearance of vascular invasion/extrahepatic spread. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), which is not a conventional one but defined as TTUP, or time to any cause of death plus overall survival (OS). Multiplicity was adjusted by gatekeeping hierarchical testing.ResultsMedian PFS was significantly longer in the TACE plus sorafenib than in the TACE alone group (25.2 vs 13.5 months; p=0.006). OS was not analysed because only 73.6% of OS events were reached. Median TTUP (26.7 vs 20.6 months; p=0.02) was also significantly longer in the TACE plus sorafenib group. OS at 1 year and 2 years in TACE plus sorafenib group and TACE alone group were 96.2% and 82.7% and 77.2% and 64.6%, respectively. There were no unexpected toxicities.ConclusionTACE plus sorafenib significantly improved PFS over TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. Adverse events were consistent with those of previous TACE combination trials.Trial registration numberNCT01217034.

Background: To improve the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer, more accurate serum diagnostic methods are required. We used serum metabolomics as a diagnostic method for pancreatic cancer.Methods: Sera from patients with pancreatic cancer, healthy volunteers, and chronic pancreatitis were collected at multiple institutions. The pancreatic cancer and healthy volunteers were randomly allocated to the training or the validation set. All of the chronic pancreatitis cases were included in the validation set. In each study, the subjects' serum metabolites were analyzed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and a data processing system using an in-house library. The diagnostic model constructed via multiple logistic regression analysis in the training set study was evaluated on the basis of its sensitivity and specificity, and the results were confirmed by the validation set study.Results: In the training set study, which included 43 patients with pancreatic cancer and 42 healthy volunteers, the model possessed high sensitivity (86.0%) and specificity (88.1%) for pancreatic cancer. The use of the model was confirmed in the validation set study, which included 42 pancreatic cancer, 41 healthy volunteers, and 23 chronic pancreatitis; that is, it displayed high sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (78.1%); and furthermore, it displayed higher sensitivity (77.8%) in resectable pancreatic cancer and lower false-positive rate (17.4%) in chronic pancreatitis than conventional markers.Conclusions: Our model possessed higher accuracy than conventional tumor markers at detecting the resectable patients with pancreatic cancer in cohort including patients with chronic pancreatitis.Impact: It is a promising method for improving the prognosis of pancreatic cancer via its early detection and accurate discrimination from chronic pancreatitis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(4); 571-9. Ó2013 AACR.

Introduction Several clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus molecular-targeted agents versus TACE alone revealed no clinical benefits in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Here, we report the final OS analysis from the TACTICS trial, which previously demonstrated significant improvement in PFS with TACE plus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (NCT01217034). Methods Patients with unresectable HCC were randomised to a TACE plus sorafenib group(N=80) or a TACE alone group(N=76). Patients in the combination treatment group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2–3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable progression. In this trial, TACE-specific PFS was used. TACE-specific PFS is defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, and PD was defined as untreatable (UnTACEable) progression, caused by the inability of a patient to further receive or benefit from TACE for reasons that include intrahepatic tumor progression (25% increase vs baseline) according to RECICL, the detection of extrahepatic spread, vascular invasion or transient deterioration of liver function to Child-Pugh C after TACE. Results At the cut-off date of 31 July 2020, 131 OS events were observed. The median OS was 36.2 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 30.8 months with TACE alone (hazard ratio [HR]=0.861; 95% confidence interval [CI), 0.607–1.223; P=0.40, ΔOS, 5.4 months). The updated PFS was 22.8 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 13.5 months with TACE alone (HR=0.661; 95% CI, 0.466–0.938; P=0.02). Post-trial treatments with active procedures/agents were received by 47 (58.8%) patients in the TACE plus sorafenib group and 58 (76.3%) in the TACE alone group (P=0.01). In post hoc analysis, PFS and OS benefit were shown in HCC patients with tumor burden beyond up-to-7 criteria. Conclusions In TACTICS trial, TACE plus sorafenib did not show significant OS benefit over TACE alone; however, clinical meaningful OS prolongation and significantly improved PFS was observed. Thus, the TACE plus sorafenib can be considered a choice of treatment in intermediate stage HCC, especially in patients with high tumor burden. Trial Registration: NCT01217034

206 Background: There is no proven evidence that combination therapy of TACE with sorafenib (TS group) prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) compared to TACE alone (T group) in patients with unresectable HCC. Methods: In this randomized, open label, multicenter, comparative trial (NCT01217034), patients with unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh score ≤7, ECOG performance status 0-1, no vascular invasion (VI), no extrahepatic spread (EHS), size≤10 cm and number≤10 and adequate organ function were randomized 1:1 (stratification by institution, Milan criteria in or out, and number of previous TACE 0 or 1-2) to T or TS. In TS group, sorafenib 400 mg once daily was pretreated for 2-3 weeks prior to TACE followed by 800mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until the time to untreatable progression (TTUP), which was defined as the time to the date of a state when TACE continuation is not possible due to untreatable tumor progression, deterioration to Child-Pugh C or appearance of VI/EHS. Co-primary endpoints are PFS and OS. Multiplicity is adjusted using a gatekeeping hierarchical testing. PFS event in this trial was defined as death or time to TTUP. Key secondary endpoints were time to progression and safety. PFS is expected to 40% extension from 18 months (control arm) to 25 months, target HR was 0.71, with a power of 0.80. Results: The trial was conducted in 33 institutions and a total of 156 patients were randomized to T (n = 76) or TS (n = 80). Median PFS in the T group and TS group was 13.5 and 25.2 months (HR = 0.59, 95%CI 0.41-0.87; p = 0.006), respectively. The number of OS events has not reached. Median TTP was 13.5 and 24.1 months in the T and TS groups (HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.83; p = 0.004). Median TTUP was 20.6 and 26.7 months in the T and TS groups (HR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.35-0.92; p = 0.02), respectively. There was no unexpected toxicity. Conclusions: Sorafenib in combination with TACE significantly improved PFS over TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile with previous TACE combination trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01217034.