Background Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended after coronary stenting to prevent thrombotic complications, yet the benefits and risks of treatment beyond 1 year are uncertain. Methods Subjects were enrolled after a drug-eluting coronary stent procedure. After 12 months of thienopyridine (clopidogrel bisulfate [Plavix] or prasugrel [Effient/Efient]) with aspirin, subjects were randomized to continued thienopyridine or placebo for another 18 months; all continued aspirin. The co-primary effectiveness end points were stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) at 12 to 30 months. The primary safety end point was moderate or severe bleeding. Results Subjects (N=9,961) were randomized to continued thienopyridine or placebo. Continued thienopyridine reduced stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 1.4%, hazard ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.48, P<0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (4.3% vs. 5.9%, hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.85, P<0.001). Myocardial infarction was reduced (2.1% vs. 4.1%, hazard ratio 0.47, P<0.001). Rates of all-cause mortality in the continued thienopyridine and placebo groups were 2.0 and 1.5%, respectively (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.00-1.85, P=0.052). Moderate or severe bleeding was increased with continued thienopyridine (2.5% vs. 1.6%, P=0.001). An elevated hazard for stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction was observed in both groups during the 3 months following thienopyridine discontinuation. Conclusion Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond one year after drug-eluting stent placement significantly reduced the risks of stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events compared with aspirin alone, but was associated with increased bleeding.

Objectives To characterize the morphological features of plaque erosion and calcified nodule in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Background Plaque erosion and calcified nodule have not been systematically investigated in vivo. Methods One hundred and twenty-six patients with ACS who had undergone pre-intervention OCT imaging were included. The culprit lesions were classified as plaque rupture (PR), erosion (OCT-erosion), calcified nodule (OCT-CN), or others using a new set of diagnostic criteria for OCT. Results The incidences of PR, OCT-erosion, and OCT-CN were 43.7%, 31.0%, and 7.9%, respectively. Patients with OCT-erosion were the youngest compared with those with PR and OCT-CN (53.8±13.1 years vs. 60.6±11.5 years, 65.1±5.0 years, p=0.005). Compared with patients with PR, presentation with non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) was more common in patients with OCT-erosion (61.5% vs. 29.1%, p=0.008) and OCT-CN (100% vs. 29.1%, p<0.001). OCT-erosion had a lower frequency of lipid plaque (43.6% vs. 100%, p<0.001), thicker fibrous cap (169.3±99.1 μm vs. 60.4±16.6 μm, p<0.001), and smaller lipid arc (202.8±73.6° vs. 275.8±60.4°, p<0.001) than PR. The diameter stenosis was least severe in OCT-erosion followed by OCT-CN and PR (55.4±14.7% vs. 66.1±13.5% vs. 68.8±12.9%, p<0.001). Conclusions OCT is a promising modality for identifying OCT-erosion and OCT-CN in vivo. OCT-erosion is a frequent finding in patients with ACS, especially in those with NSTE-ACS and younger patients. OCT-CN is the least common etiology for ACS and is more common in older patients.

Background-Single-bolus intracoronary administration of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) improved symptoms and myocardial function in a phase I, open-label trial in patients with coronary artery disease. We conducted the FGF Initiating RevaScularization Trial (FIRST) to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of recombinant FGF2 (rFGF2). Methods and Results-FIRST is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 at 0, 0.3, 3, or 30 g/kg (nϭ337 patients). Efficacy was evaluated at 90 and 180 days by exercise tolerance test, myocardial nuclear perfusion imaging, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Exercise tolerance was increased at 90 days in all groups and was not significantly different between placebo and FGF-treated groups. rFGF2 reduced angina symptoms as measured by the angina frequency score of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (overall Pϭ0.035) and the physical component summary scale of the Short-Form 36 (pairwise Pϭ0.033, all FGF groups versus placebo). These differences were more pronounced in highly symptomatic patients (baseline angina frequency score Յ40 or Canadian Cardiovascular Society score of III or IV). None of the differences were significant at 180 days because of continued improvement in the placebo group. Adverse events were similar across all groups, except for hypotension, which occurred with higher frequency in the 30-g/kg rFGF2 group.