Objective: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole adjunctive to antidepressant treatments (ADTs) in patients with major depressive disorder (as defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria) with inadequate response to ADTs. Method: Patients still depressed despite 1-3 prior ADTs followed by 8 weeks of prospective physician-determined, open-label ADT were randomized (1:1:1) to double-blind brexpiprazole 3 mg/d, brexpiprazole 1 mg/d, or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 6. The key secondary efficacy end point was change in Sheehan Disability Scale mean score. The Hochberg procedure corrected for multiplicity. The efficacy population comprised all patients who had ≥ 1 dose of study drug with baseline and ≥ 1 postrandomization MADRS scores; the efficacy population per final protocol consisted of efficacy population patients meeting amended criteria for inadequate response throughout the 8-week prospective ADT. The study was conducted between June 2011 and September 2013. Results: In the efficacy population per final protocol, brexpiprazole 3 mg (n = 213) showed a greater improvement in MADRS total score versus placebo (n = 203; −8.29 vs −6.33; P = .0079), whereas brexpiprazole 1 mg did not (n = 211; −7.64 vs −6.33; P = .0737). The brexpiprazole groups showed comparable improvement in SDS mean score versus placebo (least squares [LS] mean difference: [1 mg] −0.49, P = .0158; [3 mg] −0.48, P = .0191). The most frequent adverse events were akathisia (4.4%, 13.5%, 2.3%), headache (9.3%, 6.1%, 7.7%), and weight increase (6.6%, 5.7%, 0.9%) in brexpiprazole 1-mg, 3-mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Mean changes from baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (LS mean difference = 0.08, P = .0141) and Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (LS mean difference = 0.17, P = .0001) total scores were significantly greater with brexpiprazole 3 mg versus placebo. causing loss of productivity and increased mortality. 3 Although numerous antidepressant treatments (ADTs) are available, a significant minority of people suffering from MDD do not respond to first-line therapies.6,7 Treatment options following inadequate ADT response include changing to another ADTeither within the same class or in another ADT class-or augmenting ADT with another medication, such as a second-generation antipsychotic. 6,8 In the United States, adjunctive aripiprazole and quetiapine are currently approved in MDD, while olanzapine combined with fluoxetine is approved for patients with treatment-resistant depression. Although efficacy has been established in many randomized controlled trials, tolerability profiles of these agents limit their clinical use.9,10 Side effects vary between medications but most commonly include akathisia for aripiprazole, increased appetite/weight gain for olanzapine-fluoxetine combination, and excessive sedation for quetiapine. 11Weight gain can be a particularly ominous side effect because it...

Brexpiprazole at dosages of 2 and 4 mg/day demonstrated statistically significant efficacy compared with placebo and good tolerability for patients with an acute schizophrenia exacerbation.

No abstract

Background There is a growing body of literature highlighting the role that wearable and mobile remote measurement technology (RMT) can play in measuring symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). Outcomes assessment typically relies on self-report, which can be biased by dysfunctional perceptions and current symptom severity. Predictors of depressive relapse include disrupted sleep, reduced sociability, physical activity, changes in mood, prosody and cognitive function, which are all amenable to measurement via RMT. This study aims to: 1) determine the usability, feasibility and acceptability of RMT; 2) improve and refine clinical outcome measurement using RMT to identify current clinical state; 3) determine whether RMT can provide information predictive of depressive relapse and other critical outcomes. Methods RADAR-MDD is a multi-site prospective cohort study, aiming to recruit 600 participants with a history of depressive disorder across three sites: London, Amsterdam and Barcelona. Participants will be asked to wear a wrist-worn activity tracker and download several apps onto their smartphones. These apps will be used to either collect data passively from existing smartphone sensors, or to deliver questionnaires, cognitive tasks, and speech assessments. The wearable device, smartphone sensors and questionnaires will collect data for up to 2-years about participants’ sleep, physical activity, stress, mood, sociability, speech patterns, and cognitive function. The primary outcome of interest is MDD relapse, defined via the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self-Report questionnaire (IDS-SR) and the World Health Organisation’s self-reported Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-SF). Discussion This study aims to provide insight into the early predictors of major depressive relapse, measured unobtrusively via RMT. If found to be acceptable to patients and other key stakeholders and able to provide clinically useful information predictive of future deterioration, RMT has potential to change the way in which depression and other long-term conditions are measured and managed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-019-2049-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The efficacy and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) once-daily monotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was assessed. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, phase III trial consisted of a 1- to 4-wk enrolment/wash-out period and a 10-wk (8-wk active treatment, 2-wk post-treatment drug-discontinuation) study period; 873 patients were randomized to 50 mg or 150 mg quetiapine XR, 20 mg paroxetine, or placebo. Primary endpoint was change from randomization at week 8 in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) total score. At week 8, all active agents produced significant improvements in HAMA total and psychic subscale scores vs. placebo; HAMA somatic subscale scores were significantly reduced only by 150 mg quetiapine XR. Significant separation from placebo (-2.90) in HAMA total score was observed at day 4 for 50 mg quetiapine XR (-4.43, p<0.001) and 150 mg quetiapine XR (-3.86, p<0.05), but not for paroxetine (-2.69). Remission (HAMA total score 7) rates at week 8 were significantly higher for 150 mg quetiapine XR (42.6%, p<0.01) and paroxetine (38.8%, p<0.05) vs. placebo (27.2%). The most common adverse events (AEs) were dry mouth, somnolence, fatigue, dizziness, and headache, for quetiapine XR, and nausea, headache, dizziness for paroxetine. A lower proportion of patients reported sexual dysfunction with quetiapine XR [0.9% (50 mg), 1.8% (150 mg)] than with placebo (2.3%) or paroxetine (7.4%). The incidence of AEs potentially related to extrapyramidal symptoms was: quetiapine XR: 50 mg, 6.8%, 150 mg, 5.0%; placebo, 1.8%; and paroxetine, 8.4%. Once-daily quetiapine XR is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for patients with GAD, with symptom improvement seen as early as day 4.